Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why MD87 Is Not So Popular?  
User currently offlineWang767 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 56 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 4888 times:

Got a question for your guys. Why MD87 is not popular as his brothers(-80,82,88)? Just a few airlines around world operate MD87s.


Thanks,
Douglas


UA 858 Heavy from PVG
21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16367 posts, RR: 56
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 4900 times:

Only about 75 were built. Its launch customers were Austrian & Finnair although Finnair only took 3 of their original order for 8. I think there were several reasons for the unpopularity of the MD-87:
1. As with many shrinks, its unit or seat mile costs were high.
2. It was offered too late by MDD....they should have perhaps offered the MD-87 earlier in the 80's before the 733 gained much of the potential MD-87 market.
3. Not a single US major ordered the MD-87 despite commonality with the MD-81/82/83.
4. A "lite" version with less range and weight would have made it more attractive to customers who did not need its range.

IMHO.
Neil.






Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11154 posts, RR: 59
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 4856 times:

It came out too late when their was already competition from Airbus (the A320 family) and Boeing (the 737 family).

Airlines were prefering the A320 and 737 over the MD-87.

Regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineFlagshipAZ From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3419 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 4680 times:

I could have sworn Midway ordered some MD-87s. I do know that Reno Air had 5 of them when they were flying. Allegiant I know now has 2 and possibly looking for more. I see a Allegiant MD-87 nearly everyday flying over my home on approach to IFP. Yyz717 is correct...only 75 MD-87 were assembled. Regards.


"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Ben Franklin
User currently offlineWang767 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 56 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4571 times:

Well,Flagship is right,but YYZ717 did say "US major".


UA 858 Heavy from PVG
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16367 posts, RR: 56
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 4446 times:

I could have sworn Midway ordered some MD-87s.

Correct! They bought 10 new from MDD. Midway was not a "major" though.



Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlinePanaman From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 439 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 4392 times:

What was the range on the MD-87


Sorry I moved from SXM, looking for a new house on Anguilla now!
User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7633 posts, RR: 42
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 4377 times:

AeroMexico has some MD-87's, right?


Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16367 posts, RR: 56
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 4330 times:

The AM MD-87's were all procured 2nd hand.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineSabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 4311 times:

What was the range on the MD-87

I don't know exactly but I remember that I read a few years ago in the Aero Lloyd Magazine, that the MD-87 has a longer range than the other MD-80 models.

Patrick


User currently offlineQqflyboy From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2297 posts, RR: 13
Reply 10, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days ago) and read 4137 times:

Sabena332:

I am not sure of the range either, but Reno Air had two -87s (N753RA and N754RA) that had an extra center fuel tank. Reno used those planes on all of it's RNO-DTW flights, because of its range. Although the 80 was capable, and used on occassion, it had to stop for fuel if west bound flights had strong enough head winds. Although rare, it happened.

I attempted to check the range stats on Boeing's website, but it seems the commerical section is on the blink.

Below is a photo of N753RA.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vince J. LaMonica




The views expressed are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect my employer’s views.
User currently offlineQqflyboy From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2297 posts, RR: 13
Reply 11, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days ago) and read 4123 times:

I should have mentioned before that the pilots love em! Although shorter and significantly lighter than its brothers, the MD-87 has the same engines from the largest MD-80, the -83. It was a real sports car on the ground. The F/As didn't much care for them since there was no aft galley.


The views expressed are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect my employer’s views.
User currently offlineCessna172RG From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 749 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days ago) and read 4109 times:

Japan Air System (JAS), now part of JAL, has a few of them also...maybe 11 total airframes or something? While flying domestically within Japan doesn't require much fuel and range, I believe they were used on the lower capacity routes (per my schedule book that I have) within Japan. However, JAS also has about a gazillion MD-81s...so...why they have both is kind of a mystery to me. Then again, maybe they found a niche for the bird.


Save the whales...for dinner!!!
User currently offlineQqflyboy From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2297 posts, RR: 13
Reply 13, posted (11 years 1 month 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4047 times:

Boeing's website is back up...

With auxiliary fuel tanks, the MD-87 has the same fuel capacity as the MD-88, seven thousand pounds. However, the specs sheet doesn't offer what type of increased range that equals. The MD-88 with seven thousand pounds of fuel has a range of 2,504 nm... the -87 with auxiliary fuel tanks would have greater range than that since it is a lighter a/c.



The views expressed are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect my employer’s views.
User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13752 posts, RR: 61
Reply 14, posted (11 years 1 month 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4008 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It's back down again.  Sad

Since I can't look this stuff up there, what are the main differences in the MD-80 series variants?



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16367 posts, RR: 56
Reply 15, posted (11 years 1 month 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3892 times:

Since I can't look this stuff up there, what are the main differences in the MD-80 series variants?

The MD-81/82/83/88 are all externally identical. The MD-81 was the initial baseline model. The MD-82 & 83 had progressively higher weights and range. The MD-83 proved popular with charter carriers. The MD-87 was the short-body version about the same length as the DC-9-40. The MD-88 had various upgrades to the MD-81/82/83 and its own type certificate & was built basically to DL requirements.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineTrintocan From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2000, 3257 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (11 years 1 month 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3804 times:

The MD87 was a relatively poor seller. At the time of its launch MD felt that it would make an ideal DC9 replacement (sp. -30). However, many late DC9s were available second-hand at much lower costs than the brand-new 87s. Additionally, as mentioned earlier, the 737-300 and (more relevantly) -500 came around and captured a massive share of the market. The new A320 was also making its mark in the order books.

In so doing the MD87 was restricted to sales among MD loyals such as Iberia, Finnair, JAS and SAS.

TrintoCan.



Hop to it, fly for life!
User currently offlineTs-ior From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 3492 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (11 years 1 month 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3702 times:


The MD-87 was my favourite MD.Aero-Lloyd and BalairCTA used to operate it to Monastir/MIR/DTMB and it was facinating.

I remember the first time LL(JP)/AEF used its D-ALLG first MD87 was in 1988/1989 and the aircraft was brand new with its metal shining belly.Exciting !!!


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Toni Marimon



User currently offlineHlywdCatft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5321 posts, RR: 6
Reply 18, posted (11 years 1 month 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3688 times:

Spirit and Southeast Airlines has a couple. Did Spirit get theirs from Aerolloyd? I remember Spirit flying some MD-80s around with Aerolloyd colors.

User currently offlineGodbless From Sweden, joined Apr 2000, 2753 posts, RR: 16
Reply 19, posted (11 years 1 month 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3597 times:

I do not really care much for the MD-80 but the MD-87 is a whole different story I always enjoyed the flights on it (AM, SK, AY). When I flew on IB MAD2FRA I had hoped for one aswell but I got an A320 instead. And now that I think of it have been on 4% of all MD-87's...

Max


User currently offlineIberia340600 From Spain, joined Oct 2003, 804 posts, RR: 13
Reply 20, posted (11 years 1 month 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3563 times:

At Iberia we currently operate 24 MD-87's delivered between 1990-1991. Of course that was it for the order of MD's....when then signed a lucrative order with Airbus for A320's. So our MD aircraft are composed of 24 MD-87's and 13 MD-88's which came on board after the integration of Aviaco into Iberia.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Timothy Feise




Visca Barça!!
User currently offlineDucker From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 137 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (11 years 1 month 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3521 times:

I remember reading ATW about 1982, and at the time, USAir Chairman Ed Colodny when asked about new planes, and he stated that then AL would be interested in a DC-9 Super 30 as new planes. I guess that AL wanted an update in the shorter body instead of the -80. If MDD offered the -80 and -87 at the same time, they could've sold a family of airframes as the 737 family. Indeed, AL chose the 73S and 733, and purchased the 734 when they decided they needed the extra capacity. I wonder if MDD had the -87 available at the beginning, if AL and AA might have purchased it instead of the F100's if the plane was available earlier on.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is IST So Popular? posted Wed Jul 13 2005 01:11:17 by Squirrel83
Why Is Airbus So Popular In The Middle East? posted Fri Jan 28 2005 13:18:03 by Terre
MD-90, Why Not So Popular? posted Sat Feb 21 2004 23:44:10 by AA767400
Why Is This So Popular? posted Mon Apr 15 2002 07:17:20 by NBC News1
Why GA Is Not A Threat posted Sun Oct 15 2006 22:13:16 by Flyingbronco05
Why Are Winglets Suddenly So Popular? posted Sun Sep 5 2004 23:10:44 by Matt D
IB Is Not So Bad posted Fri Dec 26 2003 04:09:13 by Anxebla
Why Are These Pics So Popular? posted Sun Jun 29 2003 11:53:43 by Sergy2k
How Is Hahn So Popular? posted Tue May 27 2003 20:13:29 by DoorsToManual
Why Exactly Is LAS So Busy? posted Wed Dec 5 2001 02:09:27 by Omegous