Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Regional Jet Revolution Over?  
User currently offlineFlying-Tiger From Germany, joined Aug 1999, 4198 posts, RR: 33
Posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3363 times:

In the past few month I´ve noticed that regional jet orders have drastically slowed down, especially when talking about 30-50 seaters. Hainan Airlines reduced itscommitment for 21 328JET down to 8, American Eagle has converted its ERJ-140 orders into ERJ-145 (from smaller to larger), Crossair is disposing of its 50-seat ERJs... and so on. Essentially it seems that the 50-seater RJ market has come to a stand-still in Europe with very little carriers still placing orders for them.

However at the same time an increased activity in the turboprop sector could be noticed: FlyBE decided to drop its CRJ200s in favour of 37 additional Dash 8-Q400. Qantas is likely to place an order for roundabout 20 Dash 8-Q400 to replace a part of its BAe 146 fleet (plus several additional Dash 8-Q300 to replace older versions). Continental Airlines has recently been connected to larger sized Dash 8-Q400 order. The Saab 2000 second-hand market is currently "booming" with several carriers picking up this 50-seat turboprop instead of similar sized RJs.

My critical thesis: the regional revolution - at least in the 50-seat or smaller sector - has come to an end in Europe. The segment is gradually shifting back to turboprops due to their economics, especially on short hops (an most of them are under 500 nm in Europe) where RJs really can´t play off their speed advantage.

Any thoughts on this?


Flown: A319/320/321,A332/3,A380,AT4,AT7,B732/3/4/5/7/8,B742/4,B762/763,B772,CR2,CR7,ER4,E70,E75,F50/70,M11,L15,S20
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineTekelberry From United States of America, joined May 2003, 1459 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3304 times:

Airlines must be stupid to start ordering props. The average consumer hates props and doesn't feel safe on them.

User currently offlineJaws707 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 708 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3292 times:

Another point could be that some routes have outgrown their 50 seat aircraft. I believe that LOT will be returning a couple of the older ERJ-145's when the new EMB-170's start arriving early next year.

User currently offlinePlanemaker From Tuvalu, joined Aug 2003, 7210 posts, RR: 37
Reply 3, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3285 times:

The Boyd Group has been saying this for the North American market for over 3 years...

"As our forecast conference attendees learned more than three years ago, the new trend isn't "regional" jets, but mid-size "E-jets" - specifically, the Embraer 170/190 platform. Already jetBlue has ordered 100. US Airways has an order, too. Unlike RJs, these are not small jets with cramped cabins. They are direct competitors for the lower end of the market now dominated by the A-320 and B-737 series.

Since there is an emerging excess of 50-seat jets, plan also on a shrinking market for the entities that operate them, i.e., Small Jet Providers, which some folks still call "regional airlines." These are also becoming a part of a modular production chain, and major carriers will increasingly be able to pick and choose the suppliers which they feel are best suited to provide RJ lift. The shakeout is starting, with Atlantic Coast planning to pull out of the SJP business and try to go it alone. There may well be more SJPs in the next few years with fleets of Canadair and Embraer RJs all dressed up with no place to go.

FYI, FlyBE dropped the CRJ's for three reasons: 1) they can't go into LCY; 2) they wanted to standardize their fleet; and 3) the Q400 were basically white-tails and they got a great price (it helps that a senior FlyBE exec use to work for Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division).

Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
User currently offlineMasseyBrown From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 6147 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3271 times:

New orders for 50 seaters and below seem to have stalled in the US also. Turboprops are probably here forever, though; Continental, after advertising their all jet Express service, has returned Beeches and Brasilias to Cleveland and Houston. American and Northwest seem happy with theirs. US Airways and United don't seem real sure what they're doing at the moment, but some props will stay at both. The pax would prefer jets, but if you're flying to the smallest airports, you better learn to love props.

The best time to plant a tree is today. The second best time is tomorrow.
User currently offlineMandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 7561 posts, RR: 76
Reply 5, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 3190 times:

Well, good to see the props are making a comeback! Big grin

Good economics, "proper cabins", short runway performance... Now if we can just solve the speed... Big grin


When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3073 times:

Prior to 9/11, airlines were jumping unto the RJ bandwagon in a "Me Too" fashion. It was a case of keeping up with the neighbors. Airlines that really didn't need (or could afford) RJ were getting them. The RJ market may not have had the orders that they were getting prior to 9/11, but Embraer and Canadair have not had as many cancellations and delivery deferrals like Airbus and Boeing have had. The RJ market has grown as a result of the post-9/11 mainline cuts, with RJs orginally earmarked to increase frequencies on routes now being used on routes taken over from mainline service. The revolution is not over, it's just changed tack. Instead of using RJs to open up new cities or to reestablish lagging city pairs as the airlines did prior to 9/11, they are being used to maintain services to cities while the mainline operations are being put into a costcutting mode. It makes not sense to send a 150 pax a/c on a route that is only filling up less than half of the seats. Throw a 70 pax RJ or two RJ RTs for the previous one mainline RT, and the chances of making money on the route are greater. The RJs are now being deployed much like any other a/c in an airlines' fleet, they go where the demand is.

User currently offlineBryston From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 137 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2940 times:

Another sign?

Theres rumors that ACA would like to cancel it's order of 35(?) CRJ200 fromBombardier now that they'll become Independance Air and place an order for Airbuses. Their fleet of 85/87 CRJ seems to be at its peek.

I'd rather be flying...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
JAL Delay Regional Jet Order posted Thu Nov 30 2006 19:13:40 by Dougbr2006
AI(R) 70-seat Regional Jet posted Sun Oct 22 2006 10:09:16 by BA
Suppliers Seen Sharing NWA Regional Jet Order posted Tue Oct 3 2006 23:44:00 by KarlB737
F9 Buys 10 Q400's, Seeks Regional Jet Expansion posted Wed Sep 6 2006 15:57:50 by NZblue
New 100-130 Seat Large Regional Jet Design posted Wed Aug 9 2006 14:56:12 by Keesje
Now: Fighter Jet Activity Over NW London? posted Mon Jun 12 2006 10:27:51 by LeonB1985
Russian Regional Jet, How Will It Fair In The West posted Wed May 24 2006 00:23:23 by Dogfighter2111
United Introduces You To The Regional Jet: Evolved posted Tue May 16 2006 22:17:51 by FlyCMH
Regional Jet Frenzy posted Wed Mar 8 2006 21:40:25 by Jetflyer
European Tour To Showcase CRJ900 Regional Jet posted Wed Mar 8 2006 12:31:03 by Leelaw