Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Will SQ Launch Its Own Budget Airline?  
User currently offlineSingaporeFA From Singapore, joined Nov 2003, 108 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 5 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3729 times:

So the feasibility study by SQ to whether it will launch a low cost carrier of its own will be decided at years end.So who here thinks that it will....or wont?

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEx_SQer From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1435 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3715 times:

Bad idea. Cost base ex-Changi is way too high to compete profitably. Probably better to downsize capacity and let the budget carriers take the lowest yield customers.

User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13735 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3677 times:

Yes, Singapore Airlines Limited will be launching its own budget airline - more than likely.

The wonderful Chew Choon Seng - CEO of the Airline said that the Group could either launch a new airline from scratch or do nothing. There is little rumour of it doing the latter.

----
Singapore Airlines completes study of proposed budget carrier
By Katherine Tay, Channel NewsAsia

Singapore Airlines has completed the study on its proposed budget carrier. Vice President of Public Affairs Rick Clements told Channel NewsAsia this in a recent interview.

SIA will decide on the investment by year-end.

One enthusiast for SIA to go into no-frills air service would be DBS Vickers Securities, which notes in its latest research report that a budget carrier's margins are better than even SIA's premium service.

Like it or not, Singapore Airlines will have to put up a tough fight with regional budget carriers.

Malaysia's Air Asia and Indonesia's Lion Air are already seeing brisk ticket sales and both want to quickly expand their network of routes.

On SIA's home turf, ValuAir is set to fly next year.

DBS Vickers Securities thinks SIA should invest in a budget carrier as the no-frills pie will grow.

But SIA is keeping its card close to its chest till next month.

What is clear, though, is that it will need more staff, even without a budget carrier, now that flight capacity is almost back to pre-Sars level.

But it will not be hiring in big numbers.

Mr Clements said: "We've still got a recruitment freeze and that will not be lifted in the near term but we are recruiting selectively and we are looking ahead to staffing requirements and crew requirements, especially in the early months of next year."

SIA says it will continue to hire foreign staff who have the necessary skills and can add value to the organisation.

ChannelNewsAsia



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineSingaporeFA From Singapore, joined Nov 2003, 108 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3655 times:

eerr..i was actually asking about your opinion whether they should or shouldnt...and not a news report of which i have already seen.

User currently offlineMandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6590 posts, RR: 75
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3628 times:

It will...
and it will be filled with more grumpier staff hating but not leaving their control obsessive management Big grin

Mandala499



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineSingaporeFA From Singapore, joined Nov 2003, 108 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3586 times:

Oh..then i should ask for a transfer....

User currently offlineRyanair!!! From Australia, joined Mar 2002, 4738 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3520 times:

The wonderful Chew Choon Seng - CEO of the Airline ...

Good God, give your enthusiatic connotations a rest will you? What is so wonderful about him? He has just taken over from "Baldy" and for all we know he might just be another Baldy crony! Simply sickening...

Anyway, I hope SQ won't launch their own budget airline. I can just imagine the SQ culture slowly creeping into the LCC formula and ending up with many mixed results and leading to many internal squabbles. Just look at how divided the staff is over at Silkair and SQ. Amazingly entire different benefits await for employees of the 2 airlines despite being owned by the parent SIA.

Plus the branding of SQ is too strong to ever go LCC I feel. And I second Ex_SQer on the handling fees at Changi. Too expensive even for Air Asia and they have since decided to operate out of Seletar hopefully by next year after CAAS extends the runway to accomodate the 737. So maybe SQ's proposed LCC should operate out of Seletar too if and when they decide to go ahead with the plans?



Welcome to my starry one world alliance, a team in the sky!
User currently offlineRyanair!!! From Australia, joined Mar 2002, 4738 posts, RR: 26
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3520 times:

SingaporeFA, transfer? Where to? Valuair? No stewards... Silkair? No stewards also... QANTAS? Hmmm...  Big grin


Welcome to my starry one world alliance, a team in the sky!
User currently offlineAsianguy767 From Singapore, joined Oct 2003, 263 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3467 times:

SQ should launch not a LCC but maybe a lower fare yet full service all economy regional airline serving its thinner routes such as MLE, SUB, DAC, CCU or routes that could do with more frequency over capacity, namely PEN & KUL. And in its forward cabin instead of business class, it can have its executive economy? I think a B737-900 would be an ideal aircraft for this...Just an idea...

User currently offlineSingaporeFA From Singapore, joined Nov 2003, 108 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3445 times:

To your fav airline..ryanair!!!

User currently offlineRyanair!!! From Australia, joined Mar 2002, 4738 posts, RR: 26
Reply 10, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3414 times:

I think a B737-900 would be an ideal aircraft for this...Just an idea...

SQ would never go back to a narrow body after their 757's stint with the airline. Apparently customer surveys showed that they preferred to fly on a widebody!



Welcome to my starry one world alliance, a team in the sky!
User currently offlineEx_SQer From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1435 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 3392 times:

SQ should launch not a LCC but maybe a lower fare yet full service all economy regional airline serving its thinner routes such as MLE, SUB, DAC, CCU or routes that could do with more frequency over capacity,

That's what SilkAir is for, except SQ keeps hanging on to routes that should really go to MI....


User currently offlineAsianguy767 From Singapore, joined Oct 2003, 263 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 5 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3326 times:

Well, if the routes are an SQ monopoly then the customers dont have much choice do they? And even if there is competition, either they use narrow bodies too or the airline is a world of difference from SQ..for example on routes to SGN, SUB, PEN, MLE, CCU, DAC.

Silkair was in concept supposed to do that but as it got a life and identity of its own, things became differrent and the challenge facing SQ now is way different than when MI first took to the skies...


User currently offlineSingaporeFA From Singapore, joined Nov 2003, 108 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (10 years 5 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3311 times:

I think they should convert MI into a low cost carrier..and transfer some of its routes back to SQ like those to China and India as those are lucrative routes.And SQ should transfer some of it routes to MI..those suitable for low fares..like KL,PEN,BKK etc.

User currently offlineDynkrisolo From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1848 posts, RR: 8
Reply 14, posted (10 years 5 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3258 times:

I'm surprised none of the SQ experts in this group has picked up a report on AirAsia's confidence in getting landing rights in Singapore. In the report, an AirAsia spokesperson confirmed the airline is in discussion with Singapore's Temasek Holdings for a possible partnership. If I'm not mistaken, Temasek Holdings is the biggest shareholder of SQ. How can all the SQ experts here miss such an important development?  Wink/being sarcastic

User currently offlineMandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6590 posts, RR: 75
Reply 15, posted (10 years 5 months 17 hours ago) and read 3195 times:

Oh..then i should ask for a transfer....
SingaporeFA, after reading your previous comment on another thread, that line made me laugh somehow !

Mandala499



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is Scotland Too Small For Its Own Intl Airline? posted Mon Apr 3 2006 12:15:16 by Oly720man
When Will SQ Launch LAX, SFO-SIN Nonstop? posted Thu Jul 5 2001 08:48:58 by TOMASKEMPNER
SQ Says Its A380 Will Fly In 2006 posted Wed Aug 30 2006 22:08:33 by Alaskaqantas
CMH Wants Its Own Airline posted Fri Feb 24 2006 05:25:11 by CMHfirefighter
772LR Finally Gets Its Own Official Launch Website posted Thu Feb 3 2005 23:20:44 by ConcordeBoy
When Will Alitalia Withdraw Its MD-82s? posted Tue Nov 28 2006 10:41:59 by LY777
When Will QF Return Its 767's To BA? posted Mon Sep 25 2006 16:22:40 by 8herveg
Comet Will Soon Get Its Chance To Shine Again posted Wed Aug 30 2006 13:35:51 by Leelaw
KE Starts Cargo Conversions Of Its Own 747s posted Fri Aug 4 2006 15:58:26 by AMSSFO
Emirates Will NOT Launch The B748 Passenger Model posted Mon Jul 17 2006 19:49:35 by PlaneHunter