Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Virginisation Of The World  
User currently offlineQantasclub From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 757 posts, RR: 2
Posted (11 years 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2718 times:

Ok, now that I've got your attention, What do people think of Virgin's increasing success. I am particularly amazed at Virginblue's stellar run in Australia, where Richard Branson started with just a few million dollars (10-20?) and is now floating the airline for over 2 billion aussie dollars. Pretty amazing. (this was no doubt helped, though, by the collapse of Ansett from AirNZ's #### up).
Anyway-with Virgin Atlantic holding it's own against BA and the impending launch of hopefully of Virgin Pacific and Virgin America, will Virgin be the first truly global airline when their networks connect?
What do people think.




Long Haul is the only way to go
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7444 posts, RR: 62
Reply 1, posted (11 years 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2678 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I don't think it would happen. Nothing against Virgin but I just cannot see it happening. Have you flown Virgin?

Must be daytime in Australia as I've seen a few new posts rescently by you.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Would would not happen to be from Canberra would you?



Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
User currently offlineQantasclub From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 757 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (11 years 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2670 times:

I suppose one thing i forgot to mention is that Virgin blue in oz and Virgin USA are Low cost carriers as opposed to Virgin Atlantic which is a full-service international carrier. It would be nice I suppose for the group to unify their product somehow. In Australia, although Virgin and Qantas compete head to head, they are not really offering the same thing as QF provides full service whereas Virgin is a LCC with a low cost base and hence, their phenomenal success.


Long Haul is the only way to go
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4825 posts, RR: 44
Reply 3, posted (11 years 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2621 times:

What can be next is VIRGIN ASIA with HQs in either HKG or KUL or SIN or BKK or PHK and VIRGIN AFRICA (v v v unlikely) HQd in LAGOS or NBO.

User currently offlineSydscott From Australia, joined Oct 2003, 3134 posts, RR: 20
Reply 4, posted (11 years 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2614 times:


Don't also forget that Virgin Atlantic is half owned by Singapore Airlines and Virgin Blue is half owned by Patrick Corporation.

Branson is selling a brand and an image, I don't think he's really into the whole forming a global airline thing. He's more likely to keep minority holdings in all the airlines and let them run as successsful franchises on their own. Plus Branson can only own about 25% of his airline in the USA??? (Not sure on the foreign ownership limits there) But there are formidable regulatory barriers to overcome before he can connect the group worldwide.

Not to mention he'll face far more competition setting up in the USA then he did in Australia.


User currently offlineQantasclub From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 757 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (11 years 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2582 times:

Thats a good point, Sydscott. Yes, it's very much a brand and an image with Virgin. It's a generally successful formula that conveys a sense of fun and also confidence in their marketing. Some of their adds in Oz, especially when they make fun of Qantas have been nothing short of brilliant. Kinda mirrors their antagonism of BA in the UK i guess. Virgin seems to thrive when it's the underdog. Good on them.


Long Haul is the only way to go
User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 3 days ago) and read 2486 times:

I think Virgin Africa (if it ever happens) would be based in JNB or CPT. SA is the only African country that can sustain a reasonably sized and reasonably deregulated domestic and regional air transport market that is not entirely dependent on foreign tourists to keep it going.

Nigeria may have a domestic market, but it is serviced very haphazardly and the infrastructure is nowhere near what it should be - that plus the bureaucracy and corruption that is rife in that country would put paid to anyone from abroad investing in the airline market there. SAA will only do so if specifically requested to do so by the Nigerian Government and with guarantees in place about who gets paid what and when. If I was SRB, I wouldn keep flying LHR-Nigeria routes but I would avoid any kind of domestic arrangment (even codeshare).

Kenya and Tanzania have domestic networks, but run mostly for the benefit of tourists. They could not sustain a low-cost carrier network dependent on point-to-point traffic, and the governments of both countries would actively discourage anyone from trying to muscle in on their national carrier's territory (especially Kenya). Tanzania has already sold out to SAA, but that venture remains to prove itself a success.


User currently offlineQantasclub From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 757 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2366 times:

How advanced are the plans for VIRGIN Africa? I wasn't aware that it was on branson's horizon. It would be "Virgin" territory for them (harhar).
I kinda think that Australia would be a great place to launch a second Virgin international airline to complement the intersecting points of Virgin Atlantic. For example, Virgin Pacific could connect Australia with Asia and the US to meet Virgin Atlantic flights from the UK. Seamless network-no alliance needed! SQ would have something to do with it i guess, seeing as they own half of the parent company.



Long Haul is the only way to go
User currently offlineFlyguyclt From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 537 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (11 years 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2337 times:

Not to offend anyone. But Branson has taken the Virgin label where it was needed. In Australia the collapse of Ansett was a huge benefit. I am not sure he will make it in the USA tho. Southwest, Jet Blue, AirTran,Frontier,ATA,and Spirit do a good job on the LCC front. And Southwest is not going to stand by and let Virgin come in with a red carpet welcome. But then again. It could be a fun way to get Herb out on the line again. To watch Branson and Herb go at it. Now that would be a good and funny site to see .  Smile


Florida Express, Braniff II and ......
User currently offlineAA717driver From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1566 posts, RR: 13
Reply 9, posted (11 years 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2267 times:

I think the Virgin Africa might have been in jest...

SRB has been pretty clear as to why he has minority holdings in Australia and will have in the U.S.--legality. If the ownership rules are relaxed, I think you would find SRB owning the airlines in their entirety. I think he went with SQ for the clout in the South Asia area. They are a high quality airline that would be easier to work with than the other "flag carriers" in the region. JMO, though.

I'll say again about LCC's in the U.S.--they will run out of steam when the nework carriers can start competing on a cost basis. That hasn't happened yet and there's plenty of market share to be had from AA, U and UAL. Americans are still voting with their pocketbooks. Virgin USA's entrance will be interesting.TC



FL450, M.85
User currently offlineQantasclub From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 757 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (11 years 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2246 times:

Yes, it's always interesting whenever Virgin's around  Wink/being sarcastic (sorry!). Virgin has a culture of 'shaking uo the establishment'. They have shown that in Australia and also, I'm sure they are a constant pain in the arse for BA. The US is, as you say a very different market. many many more players...but the market is so much bigger. Interesting times indeed....


Long Haul is the only way to go
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 11, posted (11 years 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2170 times:

SRB can and did own 100% of Virgin Blue under Oz laws.

He sold 51% to Patrick so that a local business would have skin in the game.

N


User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12144 posts, RR: 49
Reply 12, posted (11 years 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2124 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

One thing to point out is, he raised a huge voice about the "No way BA/AA!" it was painted on the side of his planes. Who thinks for a minute that AA and other majors and also LCC's will not raise there collected voices to give Sir Richard back some of his grief he inflicted on the AA/BA proposed code sharing. Also no denying the success of VS and Virgin Blue, tho VirginExpress as I believe it is called has not been a run away success, as it is hardly ever mentioned.

Also if he bring the same formula as Virgin Blue, you pay for everything on board, well right now all the US LCC's do not charge for beverages and most snacks, some do have food for purchase, tho for the most part it is no charge.

I do think he should do something to make all his brands somewhat similar in scope and what they offer on board.

Time will tell in the end.



You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineAmhilde From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 643 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (11 years 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2083 times:

Ill tell you though, ive been on airlines where you pay for food on board (Buzz and Ryanair) and i LIKED it. I got a whole can of soda and my favorite candy bar for I think 1.50 UKP- I didnt feel like i was getting ripped off, I could have something if I wanted to and if i didnt then no big deal, and I got what I wanted instead of the prison-like peanut issue. Some flights are short enough where its almost foolish to serve food/beverage. Just sit down and get the plane to the destination. Watching the British Midland F/As chucking sandwiches about the cabin on a flight from MAN-LHR was a form of entertainment- I think i got mine as we were on final!

As for Virgin Express- they are slightly strange, they operate mostly out of London City and with a base in Brussels its more for business people I think and for intra Europe trade. I was looking to book on them to BOD i think and I would have to buy one RT ticket to Brussels and then another down to BOD- I couldnt book straight through.

Virgin Africa though- even if in jest, thats an intersting idea! Africa doesnt seem to have too much good, decent, continuous air service- and there must be some demand given all the people who do work there.



Hang on tightly, Let go lightly
User currently offlineQantasclub From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 757 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (11 years 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1960 times:

What about Virgin Asia-perhaps SQ could use this franchise for it's new LCC in SE asia-Asia post SARS has HUGE potential: Large, populated cities, plenty of money, fantastic airport infrastructure and new airports, cities that are close to each other. I reckon a new LCC could really eat into the major's market share quite quickly. The worry, is of course SQ's profit.


Long Haul is the only way to go
User currently offlineAirchabum From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 769 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (11 years 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1885 times:

A couple of you have said that Virgin should standardise the onboard product but I disagree. Virgin has become successful through differentiation, eg offering a first class service for a business class price (VS Upper Class) or offering a no frills service in a market with a traditionally high-priced duopoly (Virgin Blue). If Virgin USA is to succeed then it will need to differentiate from the majors and the other LCC's or it won't get very far.

Amhilde
Re Virgin Express they are based in Brussels and don't operate any flights ex the UK (apart from Belgium). I think they codeshare on some VLM flights from London City. They were formed when SRB bought Euro Belgian Airlines in the mid-90's....something which he has been quoted as saying was his worst business decision to date!  Nuts

Cheers



Biggidy biggidy bong
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
In Memory Of Paul B. MacCready: Hero Of The World posted Thu Aug 30 2007 23:51:10 by Planemaker
US Carriers V/s Rest Of The World posted Thu Nov 9 2006 16:55:59 by Eastern023
Is CLE The RJ Capital Of The World? posted Sat May 6 2006 22:57:29 by Tockeyhockey
'AMS Best Airport Of The World' posted Tue Dec 13 2005 14:45:37 by JCS
New Magazine - Airports Of The World posted Tue Aug 23 2005 11:07:08 by CKT789
US Airlines Vs Rest Of The World posted Fri Aug 19 2005 01:38:14 by CO737800
787 (hub) Airport Of The World posted Mon Feb 21 2005 19:13:56 by A388
777 Hub Of The World posted Mon Feb 21 2005 18:20:05 by DIA
Help With Pic In Stroud's "Airports Of The World" posted Fri Dec 31 2004 17:35:23 by DCA-ROCguy
The Airline Charter Capital Of The World? posted Tue Dec 7 2004 15:42:15 by Juventus