727LOVER From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5910 posts, RR: 18 Posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3642 times:
These 2 airports, only 2-3 hours apart, each have about 10-25 flights a day w/ large commercial transports. But interestingly, they are not served by any major US airline or commuter/regional affiliate. Also, while having Canadian & European carriers, they are not served by any major Canadian or European airline either. (AC,BA,LH, KLM..etc.)
Mozart From Luxembourg, joined Aug 2003, 2133 posts, RR: 14 Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3562 times:
That's very interesting indeed... Trying to think of other airports like that it sprang to my mind that one would need to look for a place that has a well-devloped airport close by (TPA and MCO in this case), has an interest for holidaymakers and some oversized airport that is unused or ignored by the biggies. Basically, these airports seem to cater mostly to people that live somewhere else and come to PIE and SFB, but not to the population in the airport's catchment area.
To me, there are only two ones in Europe that spring to mind:
- Reus, near Barcelona
- Ciampino, near Rome
Both are served by numerous holiday airlines and some LCC. The holiday airlines often come in on widebodies. But no "mainline" carriers go there.
727LOVER From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5910 posts, RR: 18 Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3529 times:
Doesn't ATA serve PIE and PanAm serve SFB? Obviously PanAm isn't a major, but ATA is.
I thought this might come up. Well, ATA certainly was not a major when they started serving PIE back in the 80's, I believe. And let's face it, people don't really THINK of them as a major. Think "LEGACY" carriers...yeah, some on here hate that term! I don't know why you're bringing Pan Am up.
Listen Betty, don't start up with your 'White Zone' s*** again.
TWFirst From Vatican City, joined Apr 2000, 6346 posts, RR: 53 Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3510 times:
Regardless of whether people think of ATA as a major, they are a major. My point is these two airports are in the category of secondary metropolitan airports that LCC and small airlines usually seek out and serve, while majors serve the primary airports. Your thread topic reads as if you are wondering why these airports have NO service...
TLHFLA From United States of America, joined May 2003, 585 posts, RR: 1 Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3358 times:
I agree that PIE is unusual. I grew up in St. Petersburg, but I never used PIE. I started a thread about PIE several months ago and was surprised to learn that a handful of airlines offered service to both TPA and PIE, even though they are only about 10 miles apart. I think the most recent case was with USAir Express serving PIE with Beechcraft 1900 flights to/from MCO (I believe this was discontinued in the mid 90's).
PIE tried to lure Southwest when they announced their interest to serve the area. Southwest ended up choosing TPA, with one of their complaints being PIE's lack of jetways.
Phatfarmlines From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1332 posts, RR: 1 Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3320 times:
Living in the Tampa Bay area, we do get the privilege of dual airports for Florida's "twin city". Other airports that would probably fit in this category include DET (when it had ProAir), and LCK (Hooters Air), and maybe YMX (charters only soon?) would also fall into this category.
On a side note, I recall reading an article once upon a time about a proposal to limit PIE to charters due to the severe NIMBYs in the Feathersound area, and move scheduled operations to TPA. Unfortunately I am unable to find the article, as I didn't find it much relevance at the time, as I knew such proposal would never go through.
Jjbiv From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1226 posts, RR: 5 Reply 11, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 3081 times:
PIE is a great airport with major service. SFB seems to be filling a BABO role in ORL -- taking the low-yield charter traffic. I'd certainly classify the two airports as being altogether different in most every respect.
Srbmod From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 17282 posts, RR: 51 Reply 13, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 3019 times:
While not an completely accurate analogy, they are similar in nature to DAL, MDW, and HOU as they are really niche airports that have been able to survive in the shadow of larger more popular airports. And many of these airports were replaced by the larger airports in the area.
RiverVisualNYC From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 930 posts, RR: 3 Reply 14, posted (10 years 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2933 times:
PIE is the home base of the new Southeast Airlines (aka Sun King), got to give them a plug here...as for SFB, does anyone know how much money the UK charters really save by going there instead of MCO? is it really that significant? i drove out there a couple of years ago to check it out, and it was like being in a parallel universe, with all these Brits being plunked down couple of hundred at a time in the central Florida farmland. For those who bought an Orlando package and aren't aware this isn't the main airport, they must be shocked at how small and quiet it is! other than the UK charters the other main activity at SFB seems to be the Comair Academy pilot factory....
Lymanm From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 1135 posts, RR: 1 Reply 16, posted (10 years 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2839 times:
I would classify SFB as a GA airport primarily used for training (95% of movements are light aircraft, most from the Delta Connection Academy) with an international terminal slapped on the side, rather awkwardly.
It's very interesting for European crews not used to such large volumes of light traffic to operate out of SFB!
MIAMIx707 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 17, posted (10 years 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2774 times:
That's a good question RiverVisual. Btw SFB looks more like a bus terminal than an airport. It's got no windows! so you can't see anything on the airside, only the street where you got dropped off and the building on the other side of it.
RiverVisualNYC From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 930 posts, RR: 3 Reply 19, posted (10 years 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2664 times:
Hey Miami, didn;t know they didn't have any airside windows at SFB as I wasn't there as a pax so no airside access...What they DO have I believe is an actual British pub, because of the number of Brits passing through on package holiday charters. Anyway, because of the unusual international activity and out of the way location, I would suggest any a.net members passing through that part of FL stop by and check it out!