Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ATA Moves Towards The Top  
User currently offlineWmupilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 1473 posts, RR: 12
Posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2374 times:

Several good events have happened in the past few months that have really shown the traveling public that ATA is not to be counted out so quickly. In a recent article Chris Barnett praised ATA on the makeover that the airline has undergone. http://www.zyworld.com/brancatelli/cbarnettorg.htm Also ATA was ranked number 2 for Ontime performance http://www.bts.gov/oai/airline_ontime_performance/ The airline is also going to be aquiring several exNational 757-200s to add to the fleet. Also from what i've heard that the junkbonds have been signed and the debt payment has been settled. Rumors but no real word from the company yet. Also it looks as to ATA Connection is going to be aquiring 23 SAAB 2000s to replace the aging yet reliable SAAB 340Bs.

Looks like ATA as a company and an Airline is in a better situation and will be around to stay for some time.


JetBlue - Bringing humanity back to air travel
20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGSPSPOT From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 3007 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2267 times:

I'm not really familiar with ATA, but I know they serve an airport in my region (CLT). Being all-coach, do they have better seat pitch than mainline carriers in do in coach?


Finally made it to an airline mecca!
User currently offlineAa757first From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3347 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2234 times:

GSPSOT,

From what I understand, the seating pitch in the 757-200 aircraft has recently been increased from 30/31 inches to 33 inches. I believe the rest have either 30 or 31 inch pitch.


User currently offlineAa757first From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3347 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2233 times:

GSPSOT,

From what I understand, the seating pitch in the 757-200 aircraft has recently been increased from 30/31 inches to 33 inches. I believe the rest have either 30 or 31 inch pitch.

AAndrew


User currently offline727LOVER From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 6380 posts, RR: 17
Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2161 times:

If I'm not mistaken, those will be the first SAAB 2000s in North America.


Listen Betty, don't start up with your 'White Zone' s*** again.
User currently offlineVanguard737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 682 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2049 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Now if ATA would just focus on serving her employees, everything would be blue skies! Don't get me wrong iots a great company to work for but they screw us out of pay. Also, the work load expected of us ramp rats is probably higher than any other airline in the US. I have reepeatedly been called off break to fill in gaps at other gates because we just can't keep employees.

But best of luck to our up and coming airline



320 717 722 732 733 735 737 738 744 752 753 763 772 DC9 DC10 MD80 B1900 S340 E120 ERJ CRJ CR7
User currently offlineCapt078 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 421 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1967 times:

i'd like to see better connection times. given the heightened competition among airlines, particularly with regards to transcontinental service, i often have difficulty buying an ata ticket, when i can buy another airline's ticket for the same price, but with better connection times. otherwise, ata is great!

also, great to hear the saab 2000s are coming; awesome planes. however, one has to wonder why they would use such a large turbo prop rather than regional jet.


User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12090 posts, RR: 49
Reply 7, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1950 times:

Maybe for the ability to carry more luggage and cargo over what a regional jet can in fact carry!


You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineFlyinryan99 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 2000 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1895 times:

"also, great to hear the saab 2000s are coming; awesome planes. however, one has to wonder why they would use such a large turbo prop rather than regional jet."

It comes down to a few different reasons...first these Saab 2000s will cost a ton less to acquire because they are used as opposed to being new. Also, operating cost. The regional jets have proven to be a difficult thing for the low cost/fare carriers unless they fill 80% of the seats (ala Jet Connect). What I am confused at is why would we replace our backbone right now? They are doing wonders for us and are our workhorse. The only reason I can think of would be the fact there is no commonality. But we'll see...I'd like to see the 340s for some of the thinner routes or for frequency and the 2000s for expansion and range.

Ry


User currently offlineATA767 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 419 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1876 times:

No one seems to know where ATA is going with the 6 or 8, 757-200's? Any guesses?

User currently offlineCb777 From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1216 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1792 times:

I doesn't show on their pax boarding. Here in ewr, they are lucky to get 47% full on flts to MDW and SFO.






User currently offlineJjbiv From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1226 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1734 times:

No one seems to know where ATA is going with the "6 or 8, 757-200's" (sic) because we aren't going anywhere new with them per se. They will be used primarily for system spares -- a luxury we have not had in some time -- and to add frequency and right size our flying.

Vanguard -- what's the problem with working hard at work? Try a day in a C8 outstation where agents are cross-utilized and you'll be begging to go back to MDW and load a GDL flight. Getting screwed out of pay? You guys are union, correct? I'm sure you're at the top of your game if you take the time to contribute to this forum, but, from what I've observed waiting for flights in MDW, y'all have some real characters as coworkers.

Cb777 -- I'm not sure where you got your number from, but NY flights tend to go out more than half full most of the time when I'm looking at them. The SFO flights are light, but, remember that the red-eye is all gravy. The airplane would be sitting overnight in SFO in between Hawaii turns if we didn't fly the transcon with it. As long as direct operating costs are covered, we're in good shape.

I'd be surprised to see a Saab 2000 announcement anytime soon. ATA's debt load is high and isn't shrinking with the addition of more mainline a/c. C8 is the ATA step-child and will only see a new fleet when it befits ATA to give us such. Undoubtedly we will eventually operate a larger turboprop as opposed to RJs for the reasons enumerated above.

The connection times in MDW will be improving as more of our new gates come online in MDW next year. This will top off the MDW flying and from there we might be able to look at lowering the minimum connection time -- at least between certain flights. Remember, MDW is largely O&D traffic -- connx opportunities are gravy.

Pitch ranges from 30-to-33 inches across the mainline fleet.

Great job to all in achieving record punctuality numbers!

joe


User currently offlineATA767 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 419 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1625 times:

"They will be used primarily for system spares -- a luxury we have not had in some time -- and to add frequency and right size our flying" 2 or 3 A/C for spares sound feasible but that leaves 4-6 to do what? You could start up a whole airline with a few hundred employees with 4-6 planes. I hear something is brewing in terms of beefing up in an existing city.

"I doesn't show on their pax boarding. Here in ewr, they are lucky to get 47% full on flts to MDW and SFO" I know for a fact that their loads from EWR-MDW are 70%+ on average. That means they are making money based on their CASM. EWR-SFO have been sold out on some days but light on others (during the week). I think it is a shame that CO is wasting gas trying to blow the route for them with their increased frequencies. How are their (CO)loads anyone care to comment?



User currently offlineWmupilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 1473 posts, RR: 12
Reply 13, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1507 times:

I would look for an existing city to get an increase in frequency and also to give us some operational spares incase of maintence problems. The 753's have started to make inland appearances instead of being sent to the West Coast to service Hawaii.


JetBlue - Bringing humanity back to air travel
User currently offlineFlyguyclt From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 537 posts, RR: 8
Reply 14, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1492 times:

A very good friend of mine had to go last minute business. He called me and asked me about ATA. I told him that I would fly them and that the rumor mill says they really have gotten their act together. The last time we had flown them was in 1996 from HNL to LAX on an L-1011. The crew was great. But we vowed never again.

So he got a ticket on them. CLT MDW LAX and back. Flew on the 738 and 752. When he got to LAX he phoned to say how impressed he was. And that ATA had done a better job than the company I have flown for, for 14 years. He had a great flight with ATA but lost his passes from me and my airline  Smile
HeHe.

Congrats ATA !!! But watch out for the Red Tail  Smile

Safe Flying All !



Florida Express, Braniff II and ......
User currently offlineJjbiv From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1226 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1436 times:

Thanks for the compliment, Flyguyclt...I know it sounds hokey, but it really is rewarding to be part of a turnaround -- especially when people notice!

May the new year bring your carrier much prosperity,

joe


User currently offlineStartvalve From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1430 times:

Do those new airplanes come from the factory with the ATA standard cattle car odor?

User currently offlineDoug_or From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3401 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1412 times:

Is Chicago Express owned by ATA? if not, they'd be payinf for the 2000s, right?


When in doubt, one B pump off
User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 53
Reply 18, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1391 times:

I also decided to give ATA a shot recently PHL-MDW-DEN r/t and I was very impressed as well...and I especially liked the 757-200's with the massive seat pitch...seemed to be way more than 33" there!

Greg



Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineATA767 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 419 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1297 times:

ATA has really changed. They have to do a better PR job but I know they are working on it. Their service is being beefed up in many ways and would not be surprised if they started offering business class on some flights.

User currently offlineTiger119 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1919 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1274 times:

As I understand it, Chicago Express D/B/A ATA Express is a subsidiary of the holding company that owns/runs ATA.


Flying is the second greatest thrill known to mankind, landing is the first!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
STL Who Is The Top Dog Now posted Sun Dec 24 2006 19:15:26 by JetJeanes
The View From The Top...there Is No Better Place posted Sun Nov 12 2006 23:44:43 by BHXDTW
Y3, Chaos At The Top Of B's Plans? posted Wed Sep 27 2006 20:57:50 by AirSpare
Another 777 Thread: The Top Ten posted Sun Mar 5 2006 13:40:03 by Glom
AA One Of The Top 25 Employers In Latin America posted Sun Nov 13 2005 05:32:14 by Juventus
Status For The Top Airlines In The US posted Fri Sep 16 2005 02:12:17 by UAcosCS
ATA - Today Is The Big Day posted Mon Sep 12 2005 18:13:36 by AndrewUber
Air Canada: One Of The Top Airlines Of The Future? posted Sun May 29 2005 18:55:32 by AC787
ATA Loads On The PHX-OGG, How Are They? posted Sun Mar 13 2005 02:21:53 by AV8AJET
Who Are The Top 10 Airlines In The US? posted Thu Dec 30 2004 03:27:00 by Future757