Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Singapore Airlines, LX Return To Pakistan  
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13745 posts, RR: 19
Posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 5091 times:

Singapore Airlines Limited - A Member of Star Alliance - and Swiss International Air Lines (who has said in the past that it would like to mimic the former), are to return to Pakistan according to an "informed sources".

"Both the airlines are expected to come in Pakistan by the first quarter of 2004."

"A group of travel agents have been invited by the area managers of both the airlines to assess the market potential."

More information at the Pakistan Link website


Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineVimanav From India, joined Jul 2003, 1524 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 5055 times:

SQ I can understand... but when did LX ever leave, that they now have to come back ??

rgds//Vimanav



Sarfaroshi kii tamannaa ab hamaare dil mein hai, Dekhnaa hai zor kitnaa baazu-e-qaatil mein hai
User currently offlineMD-11 forever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 5045 times:

Who said in the past "they would like to mimic the former"? Can't remember this, just that the statement was that LX aimed to follow the SR reputation of a premium airline. This description nevertheless is NOT a monopoly of SQ.... Semms as if you happened to forget that there is a world of premium airlines besides SQ namely CX (de facto flag carrier of Hong Kong and in my opinion better managed anyway than SQ....).

Anyway, back to topic, I also wasn't aware that Swiss left Pakistan at all. Thanks to inform me about this! (Who said they will stop flying Friday, maybe the press conference is used to announce this huge step ahead following the master of all premium airlines!)  Big grin

Cheers, Thomas

[Edited 2003-12-11 09:43:33]

User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4852 posts, RR: 44
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 4976 times:

SWISS never left or suspended PAKISTAN...infact it increased capacity to 4 flights a week with A 343s and A 332s twice a week each from being 4 weekly A 332s!!!

However, dont be surprised that this means that SWISS is considering LAHORE flights as that was a very strong rumor this August in the Pak travel circles. The rumor was twice weekly flights with A 332s from ZRH via DXB or AUH.

As for SQ, if they withdraw the compulsory visa that PAK passport holders require for SIN which now takes 2-3 weeks to obtain then they will make a lot of money especially by reintroducing their all inclusive 3-4-5 days-1week packages...however if they do not give Pak passport holders visa upon arrival in SIN like they used to and ask for them to get visas which take 2-3 weeks then they will lose $$$ on the route...UNLESS they make sure that visas are given out within 2-3 business days which is not a big deal/hassle. SQ used to do good loads of LHE and KHI 4 times a week with A 343s and sometimes even B 772ERs were deployed!!!


User currently offlineDocpepz From Singapore, joined May 2001, 1971 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4881 times:

In the light of all the terrorist activity that's going on in the world it is only prudent that Singapore has visa restrictions on Pakistani nationals.

I believe Singapore has this requirement for most Muslim nations in the world (like the USA) with Indonesia, Malaysia and Morocco being the exceptions.

Plus, Pakistan always had visa requirements for Singaporeans so why shouldn't Singapore reciprocate?



User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4876 times:

visas which take 2-3 weeks

I've never known of a Singapore visa to take 2-3 weeks to obtain. The Singaporean consular staff at the multiple posts I have dealt with them (In India, USA, Canada) have always turned my visa applications (as an Indian citizen) around within 2-3 HOURS. As for Singapore immigration itself, I literally was traveling to there every second week for the first half of this year (17 trips in total over the last 12 months) and never once had a hassle.

[Edited 2003-12-11 13:29:01]

User currently offlineMas777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2937 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 4809 times:

"In the light of all the terrorist activity that's going on in the world it is only prudent that Singapore has visa restrictions on Pakistani nationals." Docpepz above...

Of course - docpepz - with that line of thought - perhaps the Irish and other countries with known terrorist groups (eg Spain, Greece, etc) should also have visa restrictions too. As a Malaysian Christian I find the whole matter rather offensive.


User currently offlineSabena 690 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 4728 times:

and Swiss International Air Lines (who has said in the past that it would like to mimic the former)

Will LX cabin crew now also be trained to become 'robots' on the flights where also SQ pax are booked on?  Laugh out loud


User currently offlineMas777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2937 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4652 times:

Swiss International Air Lines (who has said in the past that it would like to mimic the former)

Look at the userid of the original posting... Acting devilish


User currently offlineMASkargo From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2003, 181 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 4612 times:

docpepz...i must admit that I, as a proud malaysian muslim, find your statements ill thought of, immature and highly offensive. You would think that someone from multiracial singapore would have more tact......but i guess wrong. Looks like Goh Chok Tong should review your Moral Education curriculum....



User currently offlineAirmale From Botswana, joined Sep 2004, 381 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 4602 times:

I'm also finding the attitude of some Singaporeans here quite offensive and I feel one of them even had me banned from here some months ago, well I'm back and dont see him around sursprisingly.

As Behramjee said SWiss never ever left Pakistan, they may however be planning to start service to Lahore, also as far as I remeber all SQ services to Pakistan had gone 777-200ER from June 2001.



.....up there with the best!
User currently offlineMarco From United Arab Emirates, joined Jul 2000, 4169 posts, RR: 11
Reply 11, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 4525 times:

Of course - docpepz - with that line of thought - perhaps the Irish and other countries with known terrorist groups (eg Spain, Greece, etc) should also have visa restrictions too. As a Malaysian Christian I find the whole matter rather offensive.

Those countries that you've mentioned are not exporting their terrorism abroad so that comparison is irrelevant. It's better to be safe than sorry in today's world. This isn't an attack on Islam and Muslims.

Anyway back to the topic. LX never left Pakistan, in fact as someone else mentioned they've upgraded KHI!



Proud to be an Assyrian!
User currently offlineDanialanwar From Switzerland, joined Mar 2001, 421 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 4494 times:

Not sure if SQ ever intended for their Pakistan routes to be O&D ... I am sure that connections into Australia help the load quite a bit. And Swiss(air) was one of the few who did not abandon Pakistan and I guess they earned some money on that.

Sorry to participate in the politics in this thread, but people who say "Those countries that you've mentioned are not exporting their terrorism abroad so that comparison is irrelevant. It's better to be safe than sorry in today's world." and in the same breath can add "This isn't an attack on Islam and Muslims." are just blatantly contradicting themselves. How can making life hell for Muslims and Non-Muslims from predominantely Muslim countries not be an attach on Muslims? Just because politicians say so??? wake up!



Best Business Class: Royal Brunei. Best Economy: Singapore Airlines. First: please send money first!
User currently offlineEx_SQer From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1436 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 4465 times:

Not sure if SQ ever intended for their Pakistan routes to be O&D... I am sure that connections into Australia help the load quite a bit.

Actually, it is the connections to the US propped up the loads to/from Pakistan.



User currently offlineMarco From United Arab Emirates, joined Jul 2000, 4169 posts, RR: 11
Reply 14, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 4402 times:

How can making life hell for Muslims and Non-Muslims from predominantely Muslim countries not be an attach on Muslims? Just because politicians say so??? wake up!

Actually it's not because polticians say so. It's because of reality. It's not about profiling, it's about being cautious. Until terrorism stops this is the way to go, unless you have a better solution...



Proud to be an Assyrian!
User currently offlineKHI747 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 1617 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 4386 times:

The link that is presented as the source of information seems to lack credibility.The standard of aviation journalism in Pakistan is frustrating but as far as the topic is concerned BA just resumed thier flights to Islamabad on the 4th of this month......LX never left Pakistan(i just flew on LX to KHI last month)...my feeling is that indeed it maybe Lahore that they are willing to start and whether SQ is going to return that i dont know...

User currently offlineDocpepz From Singapore, joined May 2001, 1971 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 4359 times:

Oh God.

This is what I said:
------
"In the light of all the terrorist activity that's going on in the world it is only prudent that Singapore has visa restrictions on Pakistani nationals. "
------
I am just parroting what the Singapore Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) said just after September 11 2001. I quite clearly remember that the MFA said that in the light of Sept 11, citizens of Pakistan, Sudan and Saudi Arabia will now require a visa to enter Singapore, and they specifically said it was due to the increased threats to Singapore's security due to terrorism.

Next:
------
"I believe Singapore has this requirement for most Muslim nations in the world (like the USA) with Indonesia, Malaysia and Morocco being the exceptions"
------


I was just stating a fact. I did not in ANY way attack Islam or Muslims! Let me give you the facts straight from Singapore's Ministry of Foreign Affairs:

The nationals of the following belong to "Assessment Level I Countries":

Visa applications by nationals of Assessment Level I countries don't need a letter of recommendation etc to enter the country. Processing time is usually 3 working days but can be done immediately if all documents are in order:


India,
Myanmar,
People's Republic of China (PRC),
Holders of Hong Kong Document of Identity or Macao Special Administrative Region (MSAR) Travel Permit
Commonwealth of Independent States (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan).

This explains why B747-437B, an Indian national, can obtain his visa so quickly. As an Indian, he belongs to an "Assessment Level I" country which does not entail much scrutiny.

The nationals of the following countries belong to "Assessment Level II" countries." Nationals of these countries must submit heaps of paperwork and undergo more scrutiny than applicants from "Assessment Level I" countries. Processing time is officially 10-20 days:

Afghanistan
Algeria
Bangladesh (Except Diplomatic/Official passport holders)
Egypt
Iran
Iraq
Jordan (Except Diplomatic/Official passport holders)
Lebanon
Libya
Pakistan
Saudi Arabia
Somalia
Sudan
Syria
Tunisia (Except Diplomatic/Official passport holders)
Yemen
Holders of Palestinian Authority Passport
Temporary Passport issued by the United Arab Emirates
Refugee Travel Document issued by Middle-East countries

You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realise the profile of countries that make up "Assessment Level II countries".

Therefore, when I said that

"I believe Singapore has this requirement for most Muslim nations in the world (like the USA) with Indonesia, Malaysia and Morocco being the exceptions,"

I was just stating a fact. I didn't say I agreed with it, I didn't in any way insult Muslims.

Please enlighten me as to which part of that sentence was in ANY way offensive.

And to all the Malaysians who are bashing me, I did clearly state that Malaysia was en exception so I have no idea why you're all so annoyed.

And thank you Maskargo for you kind words regarding my country's moral education lessons. If you had a problem with ME, you could have kept the attack to ME. You did not, however, have to drag my entire country in.


User currently offlineDanialanwar From Switzerland, joined Mar 2001, 421 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 4300 times:

Aviation
Sort of surprised to hear that flight to/from the US popped up load on Pakistan flight ... aint it quite a detour. Funny, how MH flies KUL - DXB - USA, and SQ does Pakistan (almost DXB) - SIN - Northeast Asia - USA. I guess it had to be supported by lower fares, hence making the route volatile to drops in traffic.

Politics again - At the risk of getting burnt, let me try to highlight the issue here:
The problem starts when one highlights the religion of some of the countries, e.g. Pakistan and Morocco being Muslim, and do not treat others in the same way (e.g. Bulgaria being Christian) - then the reason for extra scrutiny becomes Islam, or in the case of Mas777 being linked to something Islamic (i.e. Malaysia), and that is offensive. It is offensive irregardless of who says it and/or parrots it. It's the fact that's offensive, made worse by highlighting it.
It puts a line of though across that everything to do with Islam is bad / guilty until proven otherwise. Imagine you'd apply this to, say, corporate takeovers from US companies abroad, given recent scandals (WorldCom, Boeing, ...) and block them until the companies can prove that they do not cheat. Ouch.



Best Business Class: Royal Brunei. Best Economy: Singapore Airlines. First: please send money first!
User currently offlineRyanair!!! From Australia, joined Mar 2002, 4757 posts, RR: 25
Reply 18, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 4245 times:

Let's be fair to Singapore _Air, when Swiss International Airlines first took to the skies, the CEO indeed said that he wanted the airline to be as successful as SIA.

In fact, I think I even mentioned it in one of my trip reports when I flew with them last year.

Cool it guys, let's not get political here. The situation is bad enough already. Let the Msian/Singapore bashings be confined to the politicians and lets us normal citizens behave like mature adults.

M'sia gave me my fav carrier MAS, and Singapore gave M'sia plenty of tourists. Ok, I am sounding patronizing here. Just trying to ease the tensions!  Big grin



Welcome to my starry one world alliance, a team in the sky!
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4852 posts, RR: 44
Reply 19, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 4171 times:

Can you all please STOP swaying off the main topic of this discussion and take your politics elsewhere and give some opinions on the SUBJECT of this THREAD.

Sean Mendis B747-437B...I have worked for CX in KHI and I know for a fact that it takes 2-3 weeks for a PAK passport holder to get a SIN visa...we get -20-30 ppl bound for SIN per CX flight out of KHI as we have an agreement with SQ KHI to carry pax to SIN for them.


User currently offlineMarco From United Arab Emirates, joined Jul 2000, 4169 posts, RR: 11
Reply 20, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 4162 times:

MASkargo, why are you being so defensive? Did we ask for a lesson on Islam? Docpepz was very professional in his replies. Get over your paranoia, the whole world is not out to get Islam.

Anyway BACK to the topic, so does LX fly 6 times a week to KHI (4 via DXB and 2 via AUH) or is it still 4 weekly flights via DXB?

[Edited 2003-12-12 07:00:16]


Proud to be an Assyrian!
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4852 posts, RR: 44
Reply 21, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 4130 times:

Its 4 weekly all via DXB using 2 A 343s and A 332s per week each.

It used to be 3 weekly A 332s via DXB and 2 weekly A 332s via AUH before SWISSAIR went down the drain!!!


User currently offlineLutfi From China, joined Sep 2000, 780 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4092 times:

Hong Kong also has visa restrictions on Pakistanis now - visa required if transit > 6 hours.

Bangkok has visa restrictions on Pakistanis. Face it, just about the whole world has visa restrictions on Pakistanis.

Well, if you do have a history of military coups, supporting terrorism, and a completely ungovernable province, expect the rest of the world to regard you passport with suspicion!

FWIW, I'm a Muslim too. Even though the terrorists are not true Muslims, they do claim to be acting on behalf of the Ummah. Of course they are wrong, but no need to take it as an insult that other govts decide to impose tough visa rules on certain countries. Its a sensible precaution. Here in Indonesia, all cars are being checked for bombs at the airport and at big buildings. It isn't an insult to all car drivers, it is a sensible precaution to stop car bombers.


User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4852 posts, RR: 44
Reply 23, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4036 times:

I beg to differ...BKK does not have a transit visa for Pakistanis if theyre transitting for less than 12 hrs...however a THAI visa is easily attainable in 3-4 days...HKG u need transit visas for more than a 6 hr transit which CX KHI office takes care of FREE OF COST. This does not effect the PAK pax bound for USA-CAN but it does affect pax from KHI bound for AUSTRALIA and NZ since they have a transit ranging from 8-12 hrs at HKG. Even KUL does not have a transit visa for Pak passport holders and nor does CMB in the region.



User currently offlineMas777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2937 posts, RR: 6
Reply 24, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4024 times:

My comments about the topic being offensive is the fact that it is even being discussed/considered - and not an insult to anyone in particular. I agree that this topic is irrelevant to the subject and should be discussed elsewhere.

User currently offlineBravo45 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2165 posts, RR: 11
Reply 25, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 4012 times:

SQ used to do good loads of LHE and KHI 4 times a week with A 343s and sometimes even B 772ERs were deployed!!!
Until SQ was operating from Lahore, I had mostly seen the 777-200ERs and I am sure they were doing good load from there. I think the price was good (better than PIA) but you have to stop at Singapore for it.
I even remember seeing SQ A-340 a long time ago while I was standing near the end of Runway 36R (The camera wasn't handy and it was a surprise I wasn't expecting)

I remeber all SQ services to Pakistan had gone 777-200ER from June 2001.
Can't remember exactly when but surely SQ had been using their 777s for considerable period of time indicating their growing market and presence there.

And definitely there are many airlines considering Lahore and they have been preparing for it. The new terminal was just one step, they have already upgraded the runway 36R ILS from CAT III to CAT II. The intense fog during the winters was definately one reason they did it early.
BTW I visited the new terminal just days before it was formally opened, courtesy of a friend of my father who was incharge of the accounts department in the Pakistani company supervising the work. We were able to go all over the place, even in the control tower. One of the most delightful experiences of my life.  Smile

About the sad politics that went on earlier, I would blame irresponsibility of some people here. I CAN agree they didn't ment what they made it look like but a lot is wrongly said so casually only because there is too much going on about Islam, Muslims and Pakistan. May Allah protect us all!!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Singapore Airlines Planning Return To Pakistan posted Mon Aug 4 2003 22:41:33 by Airmale
Singapore Airlines Suspends Flights To Pakistan posted Wed May 8 2002 12:47:37 by GF-A330
Some U.S. Airlines May Return To Black posted Tue Jul 12 2005 07:24:44 by TUNisia
Singapore Airlines Sells 8 744s To 2 Anonymous A/L posted Tue Apr 13 2004 15:32:48 by Singapore_Air
American Airlines Code Share To Pakistan posted Thu Mar 18 2004 09:45:14 by Airmale
Singapore Airlines Inaugurates Flights To Shenzhen posted Fri Jan 16 2004 18:45:38 by Singapore_Air
Singapore Airlines Adds Capacity To Europe & Asia posted Fri Mar 7 2003 09:24:44 by Singapore_Air
Singapore Airlines Increases Flights To BNE & MEL posted Wed Nov 20 2002 09:04:29 by Singapore_Air
Singapore Airlines Launches Flights To Las Vegas posted Fri Aug 2 2002 12:17:35 by Singapore_Air
Singapore Airlines Adds 3 Flights To Dubai posted Thu May 23 2002 11:53:00 by Singapore_Air