Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BBJ Fans - BBJ-"NG" Possibilities?  
User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1999 times:

Good day fellow BBJ enthusiasts!  Laugh out loud

I am one of the pathetic ones that is obsessed with the BBJ. Got the cap, the model and so on. Anyway, with the 737-900X proposal about to become a reality (hopefully), it got me to thinking the possible improvements that could be passed on to the BBJ. As well as a few other ideas. The -900X program is extending the range of the -900 around four hundred miles. With the -900X wing on the BBJ, it should increase the range of the BBJ accordingly. Also, the BBJ is nose heavy. Seems to me Boeing could design a fuel tank in the horizontal stabilizer a la the 747-400. I'm not sure what the capacity would be, but these two additional designs could extend the range of the BBJ to year round New York-Tokyo non-stops. Again, these are just ideas.

Now, if that were to become reality, I'd have to consider to purchase a BBJ"NG" and grant A-net members a 95% discount to fly it anywhere.  Big thumbs up


11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCanadianNorth From Canada, joined Aug 2002, 3390 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1985 times:

well sounds like it might work....


CanadianNorth



What could possibly go wrong?
User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1876 times:

Oh come on! Nobody else has some input?!?!

Bummer..................


User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2951 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1853 times:

What sort of advantahed would the -900X have over a -900 with winglets and the supplemental fuel tanks? If anything, the extra emergency exits would only serve to increase weight and decrease range and efficiency. I personally see no point to this, especially when comparing the price to a nicely equipped second hand 757-200. After all, when you have that kind of money, why not go all out!

T.J.




The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1797 times:

The 739 is limited to a maximum capacity of 189 passengers. The extra doors behind the wing allows max capacity to grow to 204+ passengers and also eliminates the need for the overwing exits - eliminating some weight.

However, I was discussing how a -900X wing, with other improvements could increase the range of the BBJ. Not the -900X program itself.


User currently offlineAirplanepics From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2003, 2738 posts, RR: 40
Reply 5, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1793 times:

I was perofrming some work on N737ER (the record breaker) last week. It needed some extra fuel tanks, and its coming back next week for some more!

The interior is absoloutly amazing!!!!!! Everything is on these things. King size beds, two 3 foor plasma screens!!!!!!!! Once nice aircraft.


Simon



Simon - London-Aviation.com
User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2951 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1772 times:

Care to elaborate on the differnce between the wing of the -900 and the -900X then? I doubt any BBJ operator needs even 189 seats, let alone 204, so I still say the extra exits are unneeded and detrimental to the performance of the plane.


The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1740 times:

Spacepope,

No, no, no. You miss my point. Other programs have incorporated wings from other aircraft in the same lineup. I believe the 757-300 may have a wing initially designed for the 757 Freighter. In other words, the -900X wing would be mated with the fuselage of a -700. (today's BBJ"1" has a wing from the -800 mated to the fuselage of the -700.) This would allow an increase in MTOW. In turn, could carry more fuel = more range.

Basically improving the current BBJ's max range which is now 6,200 nm, to whatever the improvements would accomplish. Say, 6,700 nm. I hope you understand what I mean now.

Oh, and to answer the question, the -900X wing would be reinforced to be stronger than the standard -900 wing. Allowing more weight to be carried.

Regards

[Edited 2003-12-13 20:29:04]

User currently offlineJj From Algeria, joined Jun 2001, 1227 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1684 times:

I think it might work quite good, especially with the additional h s tanks. I would buy one, if i had the money....  Smile

On a side note, does anybody have a picture or a drawinf of how would the -900X look like? With the additional exit?


User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1623 times:

It has always been my understanding that a lot of the technology that came out of the BBJ and BBJ2 programs helped drive the changes that became the 737NG.


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineHa763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3663 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1569 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

EMBQA,

Nope, the BBJ/BBJ2 are based on the 737NG. Boeing and GE teamed up to offer the BBJs in 1996, while the 737NG has been offered since 1993. It is true that some of the changes made for the BBJ have been applied to the other 737NGs, like the winglets, but all of the technology was already there when the BBJs became available.


User currently offlineJoleb From Belgium, joined Oct 2003, 290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1558 times:

what would be the longest nautical mile range on a BBJ???



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Happens After Boeing Runs Out Of "7"s? posted Sat Jan 5 2002 04:54:58 by Vafi88
LAX - Where Does The "X" Come From? posted Sat Dec 29 2001 22:14:45 by Blackened
"N" Registered Aircraft posted Thu Dec 20 2001 21:13:23 by Q400
Brussels New "A" Terminal posted Sun Dec 2 2001 22:32:55 by Cpt. Caveman
Eerily Similar Fates Of "U" Airlines (UA-US)? posted Wed Oct 31 2001 01:48:13 by SFOintern
Whats SAS "W" Class? posted Fri Oct 19 2001 23:00:49 by YKA
Why Do Taiwan's Airlines Have "B" Reg Numbers? posted Sat Oct 13 2001 15:25:34 by Bobcat
Big Red "R" On The Tail? posted Tue Jul 31 2001 22:24:35 by TWA717_200
Booking Class "R" posted Mon Jul 23 2001 15:40:06 by B744F
CX Pilots Extend "L.I.A"|Action Costs $12.8mi/week posted Thu Jul 19 2001 00:42:46 by Singapore_Air