Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SLC!?!? More Passengers Than JNB, KIX, YVR...  
User currently offlineCopaair737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2618 times:

I was flipping through the Airliner World magazine yesterday, and I was really shocked to see that SLC was busier than many major world airports, like KIX, YVR, and JNB. What is up with that? I figured that cities like that would have busier airports than SLC.

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11154 posts, RR: 59
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2601 times:

Simple, SLC is a major Delta hub which is one of the largest airlines in the world.

However, cities like KIX, YVR, and JNB have a lot more O&D than SLC does.

So in that sense, SLC is the least significant. Most of the traffic that SLC sees is transiting.

Regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2589 times:

Anyone have a list of current busiest airports?

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2544 times:

Anyone have a list of current busiest airports?

hmm, I'm betting that the A.C.I. does  Big grin





[Edited 2003-12-17 05:13:47]

User currently offlineAS739X From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6196 posts, RR: 24
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2491 times:

Copa, whats up man? Actually in all the time I spent in YVR, I was very surprised how slow that place is. You have to sit a long time sometimes to see a plane land. Very surprising. Pilots tell me it has its moments, but over all is not very busy. The busiest part of the flight is the descent over the congested SEA area.
ASSFO



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineCopaair737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2461 times:

AS739X- I have heard the same thing about YVR, but it has alot of transpac flights, and a few Trans Atlantic flights. SA - Utah">SLC has well, some US service courtesy of SA)">DL, and the only foreign airline is AM with service to HMO. But, AC could be downsizing, and that could be a reason. But KIX or JNB really surprise me, KIX would seem like it would have a huge domestic spine as Japan is famous for their 74Ds. JNB is home to SA. I was just kind of surprised to read that. btw, are you guys moving to the Intl. Terminal at SA - California">SFO, and do you think that NZ will indeed start 3x weekly 744 service?

User currently offlineZonks From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 166 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 2431 times:

Copaair737:
I think most of Osaka's domestic flights operate out of ITM, which is easier to get to than KIX is, henceforth the lower passenger numbers.


User currently offlineSOUTHAMERICA From Colombia, joined Dec 2003, 2497 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 2398 times:

Zonks and Copaair737,

Actually, domestic flights withing Japan operate from ITM maily because landing fees at KIX are incredibly high. For this reason, the most intense activity is concentrated on ITM and airlines are not too keen on flying domestic legs to KIX, and they leave it for the "Premium" routes instead.

Add to KIX that in only operates currently one runway to handle all traffic, so that is definitely a barrier for more activity also, if that would be the case.

I'm sure that if landing fees were not so high, airlines would be thrilled to operate more constantly out of KIX, being the main international airport and having a lot of connecting passengers.


Regards,

Federico in SOUTHAMERICA


User currently offlineLhr001 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 2355 times:

Are we all forgetting that Delta Airlines is changing more and more Salt Lake City flights over to Skywest? Are we also forgetting that Delta Airlines has no future plans to bring long-haul international traffic to Salt Lake City? You will see the Salt Lake City numbers for Delta Airlines drop over the next several years. Delta Airlines Salt Lake operation base will very easily mimmick that of Dallas/Ft. Worth! Sorry.... it is true!

We must also look and see the numbers of international traffic Inbound and Outbound in Osaka, Vancouver, and Johannesburg are huge compared to that of Salt Lake City. Delta Airlines may have at one time made Salt Lake City important ... However, not in the scheme of international traffic!



LHR001


User currently offlineCopaair737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 2311 times:

I just checked, and SLC was ranked ahead of ITM too. But, LHR001, Id have to agree with you, as I usually do, in that SLC passenger numbers will shrink with the shrinking of the DL mainline prescense.

User currently offlineScf158 From Switzerland, joined Dec 2003, 413 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 2232 times:

Doesnt SLC just have a lot of domestic traffic? Where as other airporst like YVR have large international traffic...

User currently offlineLhr001 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (11 years 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 2227 times:

Salt Lake City did have a lot of domestic traffic until Delta switched a load of flights over to SkyWest Airlines! Salt Lake City does not have a high O & D like that of Vancouver, and Osaka!



LHR001


User currently offlineLymanm From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 1140 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (11 years 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 2216 times:

Thanks ConcordeBoy for that link. I had no idea Hong Kong had suffered so much this past year! -27.5 million pax! That's massive!


buhh bye
User currently offlinePetrouchka From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 109 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (11 years 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 2203 times:

Lymanm, that's -27.5%, not -27.5 million. However, that 27.5% is still roughly 4 million passengers, though, and that's an enormous number all by itself.

User currently offlineScf158 From Switzerland, joined Dec 2003, 413 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (11 years 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 2147 times:

Whoaaaa! My poor Hong kong! Although im sure things will pick up for it seeing as it is one of the biggest asian airports for connections etc.

User currently offlineHkg82 From Hong Kong, joined Apr 2002, 1322 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (11 years 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 2136 times:

Hong Kong's Chek Lap Kok was ranked the busiest airport in Asia in terms of *international* passenger traffic last year. 33m passengers passed through the airport last year (compared with Don Muang's 32m). Because of SARS & the fact HKG was the second worst-hit region after China, passenger numbers fell off, and despite the impressive return to growth post-SARS, as we can see, end-of-year pax numbers won’t surpass last year’s (I guess the figure will be around 28, 29m this year).

Real pity though, coz many people were forecasting HKG to handle around 36-37m pax this year…

Hkg82.


User currently offlineLatinAviation From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1279 posts, RR: 14
Reply 16, posted (11 years 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 2066 times:

I don't know how much this would factor into their numbers, but SLC is also home to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which has an inherently close following with many members making annual journeys to SLC. Not to mention, it's the starting point for their worldwide missionary program, that has got to boost their numbers particularly to international gateways.

User currently offlineSESGDL From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3489 posts, RR: 10
Reply 17, posted (11 years 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1892 times:

Despite the fact that DL is decreasing mainline flights @ SLC, you will see the number of daily movements from SLC go up. DL increased from like 280 daily dpeartures to like 310, due to more SkyWest flights.

Jeremy


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ryanair Carry More Passengers Than BA In August posted Mon Sep 5 2005 18:38:23 by BestWestern
CPH - More International Passengers Than LAX posted Wed Aug 24 2005 20:05:41 by AirPacific747
Freight More Valuable Than Passengers? posted Wed Sep 24 2003 04:18:05 by ChrisNH
FR: 17% More Passengers In Sept 2006 posted Fri Oct 6 2006 14:39:14 by Pe@rson
More Passengers At FAT Mean Major Upgrades posted Tue Jul 18 2006 23:22:59 by KarlB737
KLM Makes More Money Than Air France! posted Fri Jun 16 2006 15:43:15 by KLMCedric
Why Is STN More Popular Than LTN? posted Sat Jun 10 2006 19:25:42 by CRJ900
Douglas Aircraft More Durable Than Boeing? Why? posted Sat May 27 2006 20:04:38 by ClassicLover
CPH: Germany Draws More Passengers posted Mon Apr 24 2006 21:02:29 by Himmelstormer
"Air Travel = More Dangerous Than Driving" posted Wed Feb 8 2006 18:21:36 by RichM