Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why No Winglets On The B777  
User currently offlineB747FAN From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 82 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 5206 times:

Greetings,

Happy 100th anniversary to all aviation buffs.

Just wondering, if winglets reduce drag and increase fuel efficiency and range, how come the B777 does not have any. This may be a amateur question, but I have always wondered. Maybe some of you might give me some insight.

Sincerely,

Menal.


) He turns not back who is bound to a star. - Leonardo Da Vinci.
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 7934 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 5129 times:

I think they meant to put some on (they look nice after all), but forgot. Either that, or after extensive windtunnel tests and scientific research, decided they weren't necessary. The most obvious answer is #1, but things have gotten awful strange in Seattle lately, so anything is possible.


fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineLonghaulheavy From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 402 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week ago) and read 5011 times:

From something I found here: http://airtransportbiz.free.fr/Technique/Thewinglet.html

The A330 is equipped with a two metre tall, outwardly canted winglet at each tip aimed at reducing induced drag. However, although a newer airplane, the 777 was not designed with winglets. At the time Boeing chose to increase the span of the wing rather than add winglets. As increased span also increases wing aspect ratio [another measure of efficiency] Boeing outlined the addition of winglets did not overcome the weight penalty of carrying winglets. Sources have since shown that increasing the span of the wing by 4/5 of the height of the winglet will have a similar effect on induced drag as a winglet, though without the added complexities of extra outboard structure, extra weight and extra cost.


User currently offlineNoelg From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week ago) and read 4937 times:

Question answered here I believe:

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1143799

And here:
http://www.airliners.net/discussions/tech_ops/read.main/63282/4/

And finally:
http://www.airliners.net/discussions/tech_ops/read.main/61048/4/


NoelG


User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2948 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week ago) and read 4857 times:

The 777 wing is already very efficient, so any efficiency gains achieved by adding winglets would likely be offset by the additional weight and expense of the winglets themselves. Note that the 777 without winglets has the same range as, and a higher cruising speed than, its winglet-equipped rival, the A340-300. Different designs work well for different planes.

However, for the "Longer Range" 777s, Boeing evidently decided that the benefits produced by raked wingtips would offset the increased weight (as you may know, raked wingtips have a similar aerodynamic effect to winglets). So, in the design of any plane, it's a judgment call based on the balance of costs and benefits.

FYI, you might get somewhat better answers to questions like this on the Tech/Ops board, in part because there tend to be fewer Airbus v. Boeing arguments and less sarcasm in general over there, but I hope this helps a little bit.

And finally, don't be put off by the "already discussed before" police. The search function does not always work very well, and if you're new to the board it's inevitable that you'll occasionally ask something that has been discussed at some point in the past. There are people here who get their kicks out of pointing that out...just ignore them.



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineB747FAN From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 82 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 4 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4641 times:

Thank you all for your valuable info.

FoxBravo,

Many thanks for your knowledge and answers to my question. I am quite new to A.net, and only recently have I begun posting opinions and questions. Your support is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,

Menal.




) He turns not back who is bound to a star. - Leonardo Da Vinci.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No Winglets On 787! posted Sat Oct 7 2006 20:27:37 by Bringiton
Why No Winglets For The 737-600? posted Tue Jul 11 2006 11:35:41 by LY777
Why No Topics On The A380 Vs 787? Ok Seriously posted Fri Feb 11 2005 02:48:46 by TransportEng
Why No Wingtips On The 777? posted Thu Dec 25 2003 18:13:33 by Moolies
Why No Winglets On DL/AA 738s? posted Mon Aug 4 2003 18:36:55 by JFKTOWERFAN
Why No Winglets On All Aircraft Types? posted Wed Dec 5 2001 21:10:06 by SEVEN_FIFTY7
Why No Winglets On This 744? posted Wed Apr 18 2001 18:08:45 by B7474
Why No Winglets On Boeing Aircraft? posted Fri May 12 2000 22:09:43 by Mason
Why The Winglets On The 737-800? posted Thu Apr 5 2001 22:24:28 by 777kicksass
Why No Winglets On British Registered B757's? posted Wed Nov 22 2006 12:06:25 by KA501