Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Tahiti Nui: JFK Or EWR  
User currently offlineBlueJet From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 397 posts, RR: 4
Posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2917 times:

Given the recent post, Air Tahiti Nui apparently wants to fly to "NYC". NYC can mean Newark, JFK, LGA (although impossible with 340's) and such. It will fly to either JFK or EWR, however, so which do you think it will choose? Thanks.


************Note*************** not meant to start a "war" between airports. lets be mature about this please.

20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlyLAX From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 154 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2880 times:

Will they be flying the routes via LAX?

User currently offlineCOEWRNJ From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1064 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2881 times:

As much as I would love to see Air Tahiti Nui's planes at EWR I would tend to think that they would end up at JFK just for the prestige of it being the United States International Gateway. I may be very wrong though. Does anyone if Singapore's non-stop is going to be EWR or JFK?

User currently offlineSOUTHAMERICA From Colombia, joined Dec 2003, 2497 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2866 times:


It would definitely depend.

If they manage to arrange some kind of agreement or codeshare with CO (Not sure if they already have) my vote would obviously go for EWR, as they would almost guarrantee a daily full plane with connecting passengers.

If no relationships between them exists, I would say JFK without thinking much. It has fairly large domestic traffic and a good amount of international services from multiple carriers worldwide.

Regards,

Federico in SOUTHAMERICA


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16819 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2860 times:

I really don't see them coming to the NY area, Qantas has reportedly been struggling with their service and Sydney-NY has a much larger market.

If they were, hopefully they would pick EWR Smile

"Does anyone if Singapore's non-stop is going to be EWR or JFK? "

Word on the forums is that it is indeed EWR, and that the JFK-FRA route will be dropped in favor of JFK-AMS.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineCopaair737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2772 times:

Will TN ever start service to SFO? I have heard FJ coming in, and TN. Are there any truth to these rumors?

User currently offlineB6FA4ever From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 816 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2746 times:

quick question. does Air Tahiti Nui have any kind of code-share of some kind w/ any airlines in the pacific (air new zeland, qantas, etc...)? to my knowledge they don't have any USA carrier partnerships. at least that would help with adding more Passenger to their flt to NYC. just like the example given about partnering up w/ CO at EWR...lots of connecting traffic to fill that plane up  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

~B6FA4ever


User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4537 posts, RR: 41
Reply 7, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2685 times:

B6FA - they codeshare on a Qantas flight between Auckland and Sydney, which connects with their flights between Auckland an Papeete.

V/F



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently onlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32604 posts, RR: 72
Reply 8, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2642 times:

to my knowledge they don't have any USA carrier partnerships.

They have an FF partnership with American Airlines.



a.
User currently offlineB6FA4ever From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 816 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2593 times:

thanx MAH4546 and VirginFlyer...hopefully TahitiNui will choose JFK...would love to see those good lookin planes there whenever i'm laying over there!

~B6FA4ever


User currently offlineLatinAviation From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1276 posts, RR: 15
Reply 10, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2536 times:

According to Travel Agent magazine, where it was first covered, TN would serve JFK over a JFK-LAX-PPT-SYD routing.

User currently offlineMarcus From Mexico, joined Apr 2001, 1778 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2455 times:

I was under the impression that thier current flight was PPT-LAX-CDG-LAX-PPT, will the NY area stop be added to this flight and continue to CDG or will this be a different flight?


Kids!....we are going to the happiest place on earth...TIJUANA! signed: Krusty the Clown
User currently offlineLatinAviation From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1276 posts, RR: 15
Reply 12, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2432 times:

It will be a different flight, Marcus, as both SYD and JFK would be new cities and an additional A-340-300 would be acquired.

User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2992 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2415 times:

I think the schedule varies depending on the day of the week--some days it continues on from LAX to CDG, other days it terminates in LAX. Some days might even have both.

I'm just an outside observer, but it seems to me it would make sense to continue the (CDG-)LAX-PPT-AKL flight, and run a NYC-PPT-SYD flight that stops in PPT around the same time as the other one. That way CDG/LAX pax could connect to SYD, and NYC pax to AKL, making PPT a true mini-hub for North America to South Pacific traffic--even if only, say, 3 times a week. Getting a piece of the NYC-SYD market would definitely help fill those A340s.



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineFflood From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 45 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2367 times:

Hopefully it will be EWR, but with their tendency to delay arrivals and departures when the weather turns sour, who knows. I notice that JFK tends to remain open and functional even in the worst weather.


LINE UP AND WAIT
User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4537 posts, RR: 41
Reply 15, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 2279 times:

FoxBravo - unfortunately, I am not certain how well Papeete Airport would handle having two or three flights processing at the same time. Certainly, when I was there a couple of years ago, we arrived (on Air NZ) shortly after the Lan Chile SCL-IPC-PPT flight. It took close to an hour for our luggage to appear (we were in business class, though in fairness, I think they messed up which can they opened first. The last people waiting were all of business class, and the crew!). I would also be dubious of how many people the check-in and customs areas could handle.

Here is a nice overview of PPT which shows the International Terminal. It also shows the other featre which impedes traffic capacity at PPT (though there isn't really enough traffic to actually be impeded), the lack of a taxiway. Aircraft must backtrack along the runway.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Bertrand Devaux



V/F



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2992 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 2244 times:

VirginFlyer, I have been to PPT, and I know it is not the largest facility--however, I am only talking about two A340s, which it can definitely handle--especially if a portion of those passengers were remaining in the transit lounge for onward connections to AKL and SYD. When I arrived, it was on a full 747 (AF, so no pax making international connections). I do recall a bit of a line for immigration, but I have seen much worse at major hubs like JFK and NRT, and at least we were being serenaded by live Polynesian music.  Smile There were no delays at all with the baggage.

Again, I am just an outside observer and I claim no knowledge of TN's actual plans. That's just something I would consider if I were doing their route planning.



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineAeri28 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 705 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2182 times:

Papeete can and has handled multiple wide body aircraft arriving at similar hours. I've been there often and at a time when Corsair, Air France and AOM were all on the tarmac awaiting incoming passengers. The line for immigration can be longish depending on the arrivals/departures and whether they are late or on time or not.

Anyway, Id hardly doubt they'd do an LAX-NYC run as they would not be able to carry local traffic. Plus you'd have to be dependent on traffic from the NE corridor to Tahiti. Atlanta would be a better destination but only nonstop to PPT (if possible) or either originating in CDG, but I've heard no mention of this routing. Also another 'rumor' on this was a PPT-JFK-Southern France or Italy routing (highly doubtful though). I think they'd be better choosing a stopover destination other than in the US as to avoid those ridiculous 'in transit visa' restrictions.

I just hope ATN doesn't 'overextend' themselves as there are already 2 daily flights from LAX to PPT as it is (and sometimes 3) and they are not always full. Cannot ever imagine an SFO route as it's truthfully just as easy to get to LAX. I've never heard of FJ coming into SFO either, they already service LAX and YVR.

Truthfully travel to FP is off and it's a long way from Europe or the East coast (especially when the Caribbean is faster and closer). but there is a huge building boom going on down there and the 'packaged' tourists defintely have arrived, and with the promise of 7-day $950 air/hotel packages on Moorea perhaps more will eventually come.


User currently offlineAF Cabin Crew From French Polynesia, joined Sep 1999, 1038 posts, RR: 34
Reply 18, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2120 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Ia Orana all !

Well, Like I have mentioned in another post, the route they are looking at is a NONSTOP PPT-NYC ! No stop anywhere !
They are not planning to fly to SFO either. Only 2 routes are SYD and PPT !
They are looking at 3 flights per week and thus need a new A343 to serve the route.
The other piece of news is that they are looking at codesharing with either ANA or JAL on their PPT-NRT route.



Ia Maitai to tatou tere !
User currently offlineAF Cabin Crew From French Polynesia, joined Sep 1999, 1038 posts, RR: 34
Reply 19, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2001 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Like I mentionned in another post, as of last night Nelson Levy resigned from its CEO position due to the strike with the Cabin Crew. The new chairman will be named tomorrow afternoon at 1700 local time


Ia Maitai to tatou tere !
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26361 posts, RR: 76
Reply 20, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1990 times:

I would think it would be nonstop PPT-NYC, as they would face too much competition and require too many planes to do Paris flights (which are not 5th freedom as Tahiti is part of France). Also, since they would not be able to cabotage from LAX-NYC, that would be pointless as the planes have the range to make NYC (barely). That is the main reason QF flights can struggle at times, as a great deal of people on those SYD-LAX-JFK flights are SYD-LAX PAX and a 747 with 100 people is not the best scenario. I venture to guess they end the continuations after they fully move to Terminal 4 at LAX and just code with AA


Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air Tahiti Nui JFK-PPT Service - A Success? posted Sat Sep 10 2005 23:13:17 by Dutchjet
Air Tahiti Nui JFK-PPT posted Thu Mar 24 2005 22:08:54 by Corsair2
Aviacsa Returns To JFK Or EWR And Opens DFW! posted Fri Jan 7 2005 05:03:37 by Ghost77
How To Get UA Upgrade LAX-JFK Or EWR posted Wed Oct 6 2004 09:10:04 by Gkpetery
JFK Or EWR For NYC posted Mon Apr 19 2004 14:29:41 by Gilesdavies
Which Airport.JFK Or Ewr? posted Sun Feb 11 2001 04:54:44 by G-KIRAN
Will Air Tahiti Nui Close The PPT-JFK Flight? posted Tue Jun 13 2006 09:32:08 by AF Cabin Crew
Air Tahiti Nui- Days At JFK? posted Fri Jun 2 2006 04:37:32 by Mirrodie
Air Tahiti Nui Canceled JFK Flight On Jan 25..WHY? posted Sat Jan 28 2006 04:54:16 by Planemannyc
Air Tahiti Nui At JFK? posted Thu Sep 15 2005 07:33:14 by NorthwestEWR