Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Not 736 And A318 Business Jets  
User currently offlineAirmale From Botswana, joined Sep 2004, 376 posts, RR: 1
Posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2182 times:

Considering they are more appropriately sized than the larger 737-700/800 and A319 ones, why did'nt Boeing and Airbus offer these as such, any plans to?


.....up there with the best!
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCOAB767 From Guam, joined Nov 2003, 1377 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2170 times:

I think it has something to do with the maximum range of the aircraft. I believe The 737-600 and A318 have a limited range. So that's my guess why they don't offer them as a business jet.


Continental Micronesia: "Fly With The Warmth Of Paradise"
User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7760 posts, RR: 16
Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2133 times:

In the bigger is better world of bizjets, why make a bizjet based on your smallest airliner, when the slightly bigger one works just as well if not better.

Plus I suppose the higher marginal operating costs for the 737-600 and A318 also trickle down to the bizjet as well. If it costs about the same to operate the bigger plane, why go with the smaller one?



Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineAirmale From Botswana, joined Sep 2004, 376 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2080 times:

Businessliner or Executiveliner sounds much more appropriate, there is no comparison between the small BJ's and proper airliner's being offered as one.

So its something like choosing a used Mercedes over some brand new car thats not a prestigious make but has the same price tag.



.....up there with the best!
User currently offlineBeltwaybandit From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 495 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2019 times:

Anyone thinking about paying $30,000,000 for a business jet is going to want NY-to-Tokyo nonstop range. The Boeing BBJ stuffs extra tankage to accomplish this.

The business jet version of the 717 is really being sold as a "corporate shuttle" with more seats (e.g. 50 to 75) running shorter routes.


User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 850 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1970 times:

736 and 318 BJ???
Faaar to ugly  Laugh out loud

Michael/SE



Airbus SAS - Love them both
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Buy A 736 Or A318? posted Sun Aug 14 2005 23:02:39 by Wilax
Why Not MH And SQ To New York Via Syria Or Lebanon posted Sat Jun 14 2003 16:31:51 by Airmale
Why Not 727's And Other T-tails? posted Mon Feb 14 2000 05:40:48 by Mech
Why NOT -- AA To GEO And PMB? posted Sat Oct 28 2006 01:34:08 by AJMIA
Q 400 And ATR 72 Why Not More Orders In The US? posted Sat Apr 22 2006 22:15:15 by Cumulonimbus
Emirates And The 747...why Not? posted Sat Apr 1 2006 16:58:58 by TwoLz2Rn
Why 747-800 And Not 747-500 Or 797? posted Tue Nov 15 2005 21:18:56 by Andahuailas
Greenland And The Faroes: Why Not Danish Domestic? posted Mon Oct 3 2005 16:08:16 by Himmelstormer
NW And The 767: Why Not? posted Wed Aug 24 2005 08:32:13 by Centrair
Why Is CPH And Not ARN SAS's Main HUB? posted Tue Mar 22 2005 14:28:36 by RootsAir