Expex From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 140 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 12237 times:
I think FedEx felt redeemed by the fact that the a/c crash didn't seem to be pilot error and/or maintenance issue rather a weather event. Also, look at the care Tom Hanks had for those packages - that is the very epitome of the FedEx culture. It took him a long, long time to open them after trying to scoop them up and watch over them for days. Also, the very fact that Tom Hanks was the 'face of FedEx', a dedicated, hardworking, family oriented, organized person who was obessesed with the who FedEx mantra: time is everything. Great flick, great actor, exceptional company. A winner all around.
Not really a disaster movie but one were real airline names were used. In Close Encounters with Richard Dreyfus pilots at IND are talking to eachother to see if anyone wanted to report a UFO. They all refused. The pilots were from Allegheny and TWA.
buy, sell, trade airline postcards: see user profile
OPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 12087 times:
>>>Not really a disaster movie but one were real airline names were used. In Close Encounters with Richard Dreyfus pilots at IND are talking to eachother to see if anyone wanted to report a UFO. They all refused. The pilots were from Allegheny and TWA.
Great scene, but one technical gaffe. This supposedly takes place at Indy ARTCC, but you'll notice that they mention restricted area 2508 (R-2508), which is out in California...!
EMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 14, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 11893 times:
It was an MD-11 as the cockpit had CRT's. The DC-10 has analog gauges, and the MD-10, although in design at the time, had not flown yet.
I also recall a scene just after he hits the water where you see the tail and the #2 center engine. But how stupid is it where....long after he's in the water, the still running engine tries to 'eat' him......
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
Mhsieh From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 332 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 11862 times:
MD11 for sure.
In fact, I think it's one of the few air disaster/ airplane movies in which the cockpit is that of the actual aircraft ( and not some fake generic cockpit)ie, the cockpit depicted actually match the aircraft depicted. I think it may have been shot in the actual flight simulator.
Spark From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 431 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 11818 times:
I think the airplane was probably as realistic as any Hollywood plane, but I did have some problems with the realism. I doubt that a plane could encounter enough weather related turburlance to take down an aircraft at cruise altitude, and Fed Ex almost has the capacity to tell when a driver picks his nose when delivering a package. I would guess that it would be known where the plane went down.
Kellmark From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 696 posts, RR: 8
Reply 17, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 11751 times:
The still running engine on a DC-10/MD-11 has happened in fact. When the World Airways DC-10 ran off the end of the runway into Boston Harbor in 1981, the cockpit section broke off into the water and one of the problems in evacuating the aircraft was that the #2 engine kept running, making a lot of noise. They couldn't shut it down. So the movie was realistic in that aspect.
MAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33383 posts, RR: 71
Reply 19, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 11616 times:
I doubt that a plane could encounter enough weather related turburlance to take down an aircraft at cruise altitude, and Fed Ex almost has the capacity to tell when a driver picks his nose when delivering a package.
Where the plane crashed is not where Tom Hanks's character remained. He went to an empty island, he didn't stay at the crash site.
NWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 11496 times:
Some things to get straight here:
The A310 Tom Hanks boarded was at the very beginning when he flew back to MEM. That flight didn't crash. He spent a couple of days in MEM and then was called to get on another flight, this time, the MD-11, of which it never showed him actually board. The cockpit shown during the crash scene was none other than an MD-11.
The weather did not cause the crash. At the end of the movie, Helen Hunt says something about some type of hazardous cargo caught fire and burst.
Ha763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3681 posts, RR: 5
Reply 24, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 11256 times:
Also, they were 200 miles off course as stated when the turbulence first started. The F/O was trying to contact Tahiti Control to give them a position update, but was unable to contact them. That is why they couldn't find him.
About the #2 engine, technically it shouldn't be running. If you look at the speed the fan is spinning, it wouldn't be running since you can see the individual fan blades.
: You should see it CanadianNorth, very moving film and superbly shot as I remember. I believe it was made by none other than that genius Robert Zemecki
: Well, take a look if there is an FE. If no, then M11. And lets not get into the whole MD10 thing. Ok, nevermind, just look for winglets
: DC-10/MD-11/ A300 /310 are the best cargo´s to fly. Love the schene when the engine "chased" him in the ocean....scaaryyy!! Michael/SE
: But how stupid is it where....long after he's in the water, the still running engine tries to 'eat' him...... As I recall, it was only a few seconds a
: I don't remember details, since it's been a while since I saw the movie, but I seem to remember thinking that the route of flight was a bit unrealisti
: I think they were going to SYD, not sure though.
: I believe they deviated because of the WX...listen to what the Capt said, "make your deviation plot left"...they knew, ATC didn't. Not sure why at lea
: Best of all.....it was the first movie where an actual company was used... Probably because FedEx is a freight carrier. Boxes don't stop booking seats
: I agree, a box is not going to refuse to board the aircraft! I think the way Tom dealt with what happened and how he treated the boxes showed that Fed
: I think to remember that he got on an A310, flew on a 727 and chrashed with an MD-11. But I only saw it once when it still was at the movies. Max
: The best part of the whole movie.....Hanks line "Tennessee has a pro football team,....and their in Nashville...???"""
: About the #2 engine, technically it shouldn't be running. If you look at the speed the fan is spinning, it wouldn't be running since you can see the i
: Regarding the #2 engine issue, here is what the NTSB said in their report of the World Airways accident in Boston Harbor. Note that the entire cockpit
: I can't remember. . .if it was an MD-11, why was Tom Hanks aboard? After all, he was a flight engineer if I remember correctly. And I don't think the
: Dude, Tom Hanks was not a flight engineer. He wasn't deadheading, hell he wasn't even a pilot. He was travelling on COBUS in the passenger area of the
: "Dude, Tom Hanks was not a flight engineer." Okay. The movie review I read refered to Tom as the flight engineer. So, if he wasn't. . .then that's fin
: It was on here over Christmas. I enjoyed watching it. Still unsure about what type of aircraft it was, as I missed the beginning. I turned it on just
: Well I guess we'll all find out in about 20 minutes as Castaway is on ABC right now..........
: Look at the cockpit windows before he boards the plane. It is an A300-600F.
: Guys............. IT IS JUST A MOVIE!!!! The name says it all! *Stop fighting over a freaking movie, LOL.
: And it's on ABC tonight (05JAN04). At least here in PHX it is on right now.
: Its on right now too ( Michigan ). In fact, just finished the airplane crash. Heres what happend: He heads to MEM on an A300/310 ( Cant tell but based
: How ironic, it was just on TV tonight. NS
: Warszawa, WOW! That was a real good description and explanation of the whole situation! Good stuff! I had completely forgotten the movie since I had n
: "Cumulonimbus clouds ( storm clouds ). Those types of clouds are low-level lying ( 1000-6000 feet tops usually ). " Alright, I will be the first to ad
: FoxBravo: Yup... he is/was on his way to Malaysia. Private conversation with his wife (Helen Hunt) after christmas dinner with relatives comfirmed it.
: To segway on Groundstop's post, thunderheads have had recorded tops well over 60,000 feet...especially volitile tornadic storms over the central U.S.
: Aside from all the obvious errors in the crash sequence, I watched the scene over a few times and noticed that, like a few of you, there were some ver
: During the hectic cockpit scene, the pilots clearly state they are at FL350.
: I have this on DVD and watch it every so often. Just to follow up with those who pay attentioned to the movie Plane that crashed : MD11 (check the CRT
: WILSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (sorry, had to do it!) "Which one is the jump seat? It had been a while since I've done this..." Matt --
: It was an MD-11 which was shown in the crash, for sure.
: The film was broadcasted in Germany after X-Mas as well. The crashing plane was a MD-11. However, like in most films with aviation aspects, fiction su
: Fantastically terrifying crash sequence anyhow! Shame about the rest of the movie. Imagine a pissed-off airline employee slipping this DVD into the se
: I just don't think the movie is realistic, because there is no way he could have survived the crash. I doubt that he would have survived the impact, a