Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airbus 330 New Variant  
User currently offlineAZMD80 From Italy, joined Nov 2003, 290 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 5011 times:

On many magazine, and also on the airbus site, still some times ago, I'we red about new variant of the A 330. What's about a 330 -500/600, with longer range and streched fuselage? Couldn't it fill the gaap in comparison with the new improved version of the B777.
And what about a shortest version, tha could replace A 300 and 310, officilay still in production, but otu of the passeger market?

21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16228 posts, RR: 57
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4915 times:

Airbus offered a shrunken 330 dubbed the 330-500 to Singapore Airlines. Similarly, Boeing offered a 777 shrink to Singapore. SQ was not interested in either.

The problem with a further 330 shrink is that it would be a heavy (and hence inefficient) aircraft as an A300/310 replacement. For this reason, shrinks tend not to do well; witness the 747SP, 737-600, MD-87, A318, L1011-500.






Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4907 times:

And what about a shortest version, tha could replace A 300 and 310, officilay still in production

Airbus has been there, tried that, and failed.

Both SQ and LH (the main targets) rejected the proposed A330-500


User currently offlineQantasA332 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1500 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4865 times:

There are always rumours about these things, and some are bound to be true. One I'd particularly like to see would be a shorter version A330, somewhere between A320 family and A330-200/300 a/c in terms of PAX capacity and range, for a 767 replacement...

qantasA332


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4808 times:

For this reason, shrinks tend not to do well

Airbus has been very successful with two shrinks (A319 and A332)... but they've tried to push their luck twice on each airframe (A318 and A335), and basically failed* both times.


*the A318 at this point, cannot be accurately referred to as a failure.... though its sales have been abysmal considering Airbus' projections.


User currently offlineAZMD80 From Italy, joined Nov 2003, 290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4765 times:

the 330- 500 was a schrinked version not a stretched one?

bie


User currently offlineVSGirl From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4782 times:

A number of British charter airlines would like to see a replacement for the Boeing 767 sized aircraft. One of them would be Britannia Airways... Even though Boeing has the B753 Britannia as with some other airlines do not see this as a replacement for the B762...

Kimberly.


User currently offlineCaribb From Canada, joined Nov 1999, 1633 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4597 times:

The 7E7 is suppose to be the 757/767 replacement.

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4558 times:

the 330- 500 was a schrinked version not a stretched one?

It was never officially launched, only proposed... but yes, should the airlines have been interested, the A335 would have been smaller than the A332 is now.


User currently offlineB727-200 From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 1051 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4503 times:


As they essentially have the same fuselage cross-section and design, wouldn't a shrunken A330 just be like an A300/A310 with a different wing?

B727-200.



User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4471 times:

wouldn't a shrunken A330 just be like an A300/A310 with a different wing

nope, too heavy for the missions they planned it.

That's why the 771 and 771X concepts never worked... same for the relative failure of the 736, A318, M87, 747SP, L15, etc


User currently offlineAZMD80 From Italy, joined Nov 2003, 290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3842 times:

I'we red about a streched version of A330, with a range like 330-300 and a fuselage like 340-500. It could be used on route that doesn't need the range of new 340 500/600 but are very busy.



User currently offlineTrent900 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 515 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 3558 times:

I'm sure Airbus could quite easily modernize the A300/310 to be a suitable replacement of itself; updated wing, new engines, f-b-w etc, etc. In my opinion the A300 is still a lovely aircraft to fly in.

Trent.


User currently offlineCanadianNorth From Canada, joined Aug 2002, 3387 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 3519 times:

There is a A300/A310/757/767 replacement coming. Its currently being called the Boeing 7E7.


CanadianNorth



What could possibly go wrong?
User currently offlineTrent900 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 515 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 3446 times:

Very true. The 7E7 is going to be a very interesting aircraft.

But could Airbus maybe tweak a new version of the A300 to be just as efficient?

Trent.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16345 posts, RR: 86
Reply 15, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3295 times:

But could Airbus maybe tweak a new version of the A300 to be just as efficient?

They think they could.

N


User currently offlineVivaGunners From Italy, joined Oct 2000, 363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3187 times:

Trent got reason, Airbus could and should launch
A300 next-generation. Many airlines wouold use that plane, think about LH TG KE JL CI and chinese carriers. That would be the prerfect plane for them all.

Cheers.



Any ideas for a signature?
User currently offlineAvObserver From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 2445 posts, RR: 9
Reply 17, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3066 times:

"But could Airbus maybe tweak a new version of the A300 to be just as efficient? (as the 7E7)" "They think they could."

I seriously doubt they really think this, though they may be saying it to deflect Boeing claims for the 7E7. As with the A332 to the long-range 7E7 Stretch, it'll be tons heavier than the 7E7 Short-Range. Giving it advanced engines will help but not enough. Replacing much of its' existing alloy structure with composites, as well as redoing the wing will help a lot more but be such a major redesign, it would probably be more cost-effective to go to a brand new airplane that could truly compete on even terms with the 7E7. I don't know why this argument of 'tweaking' existing variants always comes up; as with Boeing's lame claims for its' aborted 747X vs. the all-new A380, no existing A300/330 can be as efficient as the 7E7 if THAT airplane meets Boeing claims. They may get closer with new engines but not a match. It's typical manufacturer's counter-marketing claims, that's all. I'm sure Airbus WILL field an all-new, largely composite-bodied competitor to replace the A300/310 and perhaps also the A332 in markets targeted by the 7E7 as soon as they can, after the A380 overhead is behind them. The recent Aviation Week article, "Boeing Bets On Long Haul", said Airbus's next goal is to develop a successor to the A300-600R in the 300 seat category to enter service no earlier than 2012. Though Airbus says no A330 replacement is coming, I'm not sure I buy that. To admit that would devalue the current aircraft in the market. Believe me, Airbus won't waste time and money on a half-hearted effort.



User currently offlineAZMD80 From Italy, joined Nov 2003, 290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2945 times:

I fly one times on a TAP A310 from LIS to SAL, and one times LH from FRA to Berlin, I don't remember which airport.
I find this planes very confortable and not "old". I think is very similar (not only the fuselage that is the same, but also the sound, the interior, seat, comfort at all) to new 330 series.
It's anly lack in PVT but many airlines doesn't put it on economy class on new planes too.
I think it can be a grat task to improve and modernze this aircraft. The prodiction line is still opened, so it could be also not too expansive.


User currently offlineLhr001 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2881 times:

Having been a crew member and worked on the A310, A300, and 777... Hands down the A310 is the best! The size is perfect for short hops or low-demand long haul services. If I recall correctly Aerolineas Argentinas used the A310 nonstop from EZE-JFK back in the late 1990's. Royal Jordanian used it from New York to Amsteram and many other airlines as well have found the aircraft to be efficient and very cost effective. The design makes for a splendid First and Business class cabin. The 777 is very nice and spacious... However, it is very, very expensive in comparisson to the current A340 and A330 variants being offered. Dont forget that non of the U.S. airlines have made use of the 777-300 as well! This variant seems to be only effective in the Middle East and Asia!


LHR001


User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 20, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2839 times:

The A330-500 shrink project, to replace the A300/310, was actually several projects; first, a simple shrink of the A332 was offered - that proposal was quickly rejected by LH as the result was a super long range aircraft and LH was far more interested in a large capacity aircraft to fly between FRA and MUN. Next, the A330 cockpit was merged with the A300, and of course some systems updated to the new A330 standard (there were other issues, nothing is that simple) but SQ was totally underwhelmed by the result. A final approach was a slightly shortened A332 fuselage with a new wing (based on the older A300 design) and new engines....according to rumor, this proposal almost got off the ground but its timing was wrong as the airline industry was already suffering its major downturn and SQ had already extended its 777 program to replace A310s.

Airbus will come up with something at some point to bridge the gap between the A321 and the A332, especially for shorter haul markets, as this segment may become important as pax numbers rise and frequency cannot be increased due to airport slot limitations. I still think that the solution will be a wide-body type......Boeing's very good and very economical 753, which should have done better in the market place and could have replaced older large airliners on shorter-haul routes, was not successful due to its single aisle, long fuselage layout....passengers (especially those in Asia) prefer high capacity aircraft to be widebody and there was much concern about the time it takes to unload/load a narrow body airliner.


User currently offlineAZMD80 From Italy, joined Nov 2003, 290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2646 times:

Todaj on JP4, an italian aviation magazine, I've red that there are rumors from Airbus to launch the A30X or A305 program.
It schuld be an improved version (fly by Wire, composite , new engine ) of the 300- 310 and not a short 330.

What's about?


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus Eyes 3 New Planes To Battle Boeing posted Fri Jul 14 2006 16:06:15 by Okelleynyc
Imminent: Airbus Reveals New A350 posted Wed Jun 7 2006 07:22:28 by Singapore_Air
Airbus 330-200 VS A330-300 posted Mon Jun 5 2006 21:11:02 by YULYMX
Airbus Aid: A New Complaint To WTO posted Wed May 10 2006 08:51:12 by Leelaw
Airbus 330-200 For Vietnam Airlines? posted Wed Apr 26 2006 09:59:53 by Johnny
Airbus 330 TAP. Where Do They Come From? posted Wed Apr 19 2006 19:19:36 by Maperrin
Its Almost Official - LY Getting Airbus 330's! posted Sun Apr 16 2006 12:00:44 by Amirs
Airbus Seeks New Buyers Of Emirates A340-600s posted Mon Mar 20 2006 18:42:44 by EI321
Iraqi Airbus Fleet... New Orders?!? posted Mon Jan 30 2006 17:46:13 by BHXDTW
Airbus Hiring New Composite Specialists posted Sat Jan 14 2006 19:03:14 by Glareskin