Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA E-190's  
User currently offlineFuelhog From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 50 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2874 times:

Just wondering if American Airlines might go for the Big Embraer jet for a new 100-seater.Given that Amr is a big Embraer customer,I'm wondering if Embraer might offer them a good deal to purchases them.They would have good fleet experience with their other Embraer's, not to mention their low cost competiors are looking at them too.Working at AA,I've heard a lot of talk about this might occuring from pilots and mechanics.Wondering if anyone out there as heard simaliar talk or if this would seem like a logical choice. Thanks

20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSjc>sfo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2813 times:

I guess I didn't consider this before... could be a mainline replacement for the F100s eventually; though it would get complicated, given than the seating on the F100 is hardly conducive to putting in a domestic first class, and that all AAs current Embraer pilots are Eagle; moving them into mainline would make the unions shit a brick.

User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2734 times:

Yeah, this would be great idea for AA will replace of F-100 to new EMB-190 anytime soon and who cares?

User currently offlineAA717driver From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1566 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2685 times:

Carty talked about it. I doubt it will happen unless Eagle gets them.TC


FL450, M.85
User currently offlineAviatortj From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1838 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2668 times:

Why couldn't F100 pilots be trained for the EMB? If they were mainline planes, they would be flown by mainline pilots. No one knows what AA is going to do for its 100 seater right now. Maybe some better financed 717s or smaller 737s will come around for them.

__TJ__


User currently offline7574EVER From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 478 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2635 times:

I've also heard that AA may be replacing the little Fokkers with the EMB-190. However, this would require that the Fokker crews go through extensive and costly training on a whole new aircraft. It would be far cheaper to have ERJ pilots from Eagle trained in the 190's and put on mainline, but as Sjc>sfo had mentioned, this may cause union problems. To me, the logical thing to do would be to have the 190's operated by Eagle and have the once mainline routes flown by the Fokker now operated by Eagle in the 190's. Although I do realize that technically the 190 is not a regional jet, so I don't know how this would play into the scheme of things. Anyway, just my two cents.


Right rudder....Right rudder...Come on, more right rudder....Right rudder......Aw forget it, I quit!!
User currently offlineAkjetblue From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 790 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2630 times:

AA had some 717s when they bought TWA and then returned them...
makes ya wonder...

-philzymco



Save a horse! Ride a Cowboy!
User currently offlineWedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5950 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2448 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I would be very surprised if AA bought the EMB-190's. I could see them getting 737-700's, which would have slightly fewer seats than Alaska's -700's. Then pilots could fly both -800's and the -700's. AA could get the 717's, but then you have the commonality issue.

My prediction...and it's only MY opinion...is that AA (mainline) will opt for a smaller 737 model.

AA Eagle...now we're talking something totally different. ER-190's or CRJ-900's would be fine with me.


User currently offlineAIR757200 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1579 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2425 times:


AA had some 717s when they bought TWA and then returned them...
makes ya wonder...


No, not really. Many times over and over again on this site, we've explained that the TW birds were returned because of the poor lease rates.


User currently offlineCloudy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2317 times:

My gut feeling is that most mainline flying in the US of less then 120 or so seats is on the way out. 717's or E-190's would probably be flown by Eagle if management can get it past the unions. If they can't get the Unions to agree there would simply be no 100 seaters in the AA fleet

User currently offlinePVD757 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3420 posts, RR: 16
Reply 10, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2302 times:

I don't see it happening unless the two pilot unions are finally able to merge and have the transition in place like CO does. There wouldn't be any scope or arguing as to who would operate these planes. Until that happens, mainline will never let these planes become AE and AA management will not let it happen because they do not want to pay mainline wages for the crews.

Stalemate.


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7768 posts, RR: 27
Reply 11, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2171 times:

There are no E-190's in AA's fleet plan at least in the forseeable future.

TWA 717's were gone due to high lease rates
F-100's are on the way out due to overcapacity, high operating costs, an impending costly maintenance to comply to an AD for the RR Tay engines

AA isn't looking to add a new fleet type just yet. No new mainline deliveries until mid-2006. They will operate 25 CRJ-700's under Eagle. In the meantime, the 28 stored former TWA MD-80's will be pulled from the desert as capacity warrents.

Like all airlines, and in good business sense, AA has explored the E-190's. The only problem being the E-190's are not a good fit into AA's hub operations. Along with the numerous labor issues, and costs associated with adding another fleet type. The E-190's have little or no commonality to the original Jungle Jets.


User currently offlineAA7573E From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 475 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2091 times:

This thread has been discussed in many different forms. F100s are being pulled, and either replaced with more frequent Eagle service, or less frequent MD80's and/or 737s. AA does not need to replace the F100s, in point of fact replacing them would fly in the face of getting rid of them, especially if you replace them with a new cockpit.

The F100s are going away to 1)further slim capacity AND 2)continue the trend towards fleet commonality. It makes no sense for the F100s to be replaced by a new aircraft. The replacements for the F100s are the return of good business sense, the continuation of capacity caps and the more efficient use of the remaining fleet. Besides the fact that making 190s mainline would grind Eagle operations to a hault, and that is certainly not needed right now.



See you up front!
User currently offlineL.1011 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 2209 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2003 times:

Also, you should note the the TWA 717's lease rates sucked because TWA's credit sucked thanks to (how many bankruptcies?!)

User currently offlineKempa From Brazil, joined Aug 2003, 373 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1978 times:

I wonder how far in the future are Embraer's 170 and 190 production lines booked?

"No new mainline deliveries until mid-2006" sounds like a match...


User currently offlineFlygirlhels From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1906 times:

Don't know what it means, but there are pictures of EMB-170 and -190 on the walls in various AA Eagle offices at Dallas.....

User currently offlineBobs89irocz From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 632 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1873 times:

Uh, have you guys not seen the CRJ-700? They are flown by eagle pilots but this plane does a good job between the CRJ-700 and the MD-80 (obviously mainline pilots) to not need a replacement for the F100. Dont expect a replacement for the F100 because its not comming. When AA gets new airplanes again you will be seeing the 738 and a few more 777's before they go with anything different.

User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3008 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1785 times:

Flygirlhels, Embraer parked a truck containing a mockup of the 170 cabin in front of CP5 once a couple of years ago, in what was probably a futile attempt to sell planes to AA. They handed out lots of promotional materials, including posters, etc.--one of which I actually stuck on the wall of my own cubicle there--so they may very well be left over from that, or other similar sales campaigns.


Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineCkfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5309 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1747 times:

A friend of mine is an AA pilot, and according to him, AA has been looking at the big Embrears for mainline.

The original plan was to replace the F100s with 737-600s, but the -600 is not well suited for the routes that the F100 flies.

The reason that AA returned the 717 was that it didn't need 2 aircraft types that seated 100 passengers. That had been the plan prior to September 11th. Unfortunately, the downturn in the airline business has pushed AA to retire the Fokkers early. They had been slated for retirement around 2010.

The 717 makes sense, since MD-80 pilots could also fly the 717. But, the oldest MD-80s turn 21 years old in 2004. AA will starting planning its gradual retirement, probably within 5 to 7 years. The logical replacement is the 737-700. That would make the 717 a small fleet, just like the Fokker.

Since Eagle flies the smaller Embrears, the large ones are possible. I still think AA might convince Boeing to do some redesigning of the -600, to make it better suited for short to medium-haul flights.


User currently offlineMjszanto From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 205 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1641 times:

I thought previous flying experience doesn't really help much in flying the new EMB 170 and 190.

User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3008 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1484 times:

It's true, the Embraer 170/190 don't have much in common with the 135/140/145. So there wouldn't really be any significant commonality benefits in terms of training, spare parts, etc.

What it would come down to is operating costs--specifically, whether they are low enough for the 190 to be operated profitably by AA mainline. The current situation is sort of a Catch-22: AA mainline pilots will not allow Eagle to fly anything larger than the CRJ-700 in the foreseeable future, and even those are restricted in number, but at the same time, it's difficult to operate 100-seaters economically at mainline pay rates. And AA is not alone--the other majors are in the same boat, which is why we don't see a lot of new 100-seaters being ordered in the U.S. at the moment.



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA 717 Or Emb-190 posted Sat Oct 25 2003 05:02:52 by Fuelhog
AA New 763 Business Class Without PTVs? posted Sat Aug 29 2009 20:08:20 by RICARIZA
AA Makes BRU A Tag posted Fri Aug 28 2009 14:05:44 by BNinMSY
Update On AA 767 Winglets? posted Thu Aug 27 2009 10:11:49 by Flavio340
AA Registration Help posted Mon Aug 24 2009 08:34:40 by TWA757
Who's MRO Is Bigger DL Or AA? posted Sun Aug 23 2009 18:52:39 by Flavio340
AA To Drop 762 (Again) For 757 EWR-LAX posted Sun Aug 23 2009 16:53:31 by N62NA
AA Flight MIA CCS Delayed 8hrs! No Info! posted Sat Aug 22 2009 12:57:43 by 797
Emergency 757-200 Landing At LAX. AA 414 posted Fri Aug 21 2009 19:18:33 by Swalifebtw
VX And AA Raise Checked Bag Fees posted Fri Aug 21 2009 12:00:58 by Crosswinds21