Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Thai Airways Drops GVA  
User currently offlineRJ100 From Switzerland, joined Nov 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 30
Posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2607 times:

Hello

I have just read in a newspaper that Thai Airways is ending its ZRH-GVA-BKK flights in February and will only operate ZRH-BKK in the future.

Is this true? I can't remember reading something on this board.
If so, what went wrong with this service?

Thai says they drop the route due to economical reasons.

Regards,
RJ100


none
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTriStar500 From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 4692 posts, RR: 43
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2526 times:

It kind of surprised me when I heard that they would be operating a B777-300 (!) on this route in the first place anyway.
Maybe smaller equipment (e.g. A330-200 if they had any) would have done the job better.



Homer: Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!
User currently offlineGardermoen From Australia, joined Jul 1999, 1520 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2535 times:

It appears the Thai website doesnt have this service in the timetable section (although no mention about it in the Press section), so it appears yet another European port for Thai didnt work.
I sort of guessed that this wouldnt work when the first launched the route back in 2002, Thai never seem to be able to stick to any newer European destinations it adds (Vienna, Dusseldorf, Helsinki, Vienna, Istanbul, Brussels, Barcelona - what a joke that was to think BCN could ever work). EVen Amsterdam is no longer served.
Andthe Oslo service that was supposed to start last week has not taken off either.

I also think Thai had probs with the routing of the GVA service, first via ATH but no traffic rights were allowed between ATH and GVA, and then it was via ZRH, which doesnt make much sense really.
Im sure LH is happier as they will get the feeds via MUC/FRA.


User currently offlineRJ100 From Switzerland, joined Nov 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 30
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2496 times:

I think they were even operating the 747-400 recently on the route...

RJ100



none
User currently offlineUTA_flyingHIGH From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 6495 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2436 times:

Right on, 744 probably until the end :

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © William Ronciere
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © William Ronciere


Made a nice change to see scheduled 744's at GVA though.
UTA



Fly to live, live to fly - Air France/KLM Flying Blue Platinum, BMI Diamond Club Gold, Emirates Skywards
User currently offlineDens From Switzerland, joined Sep 2001, 309 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2369 times:

Hi,

What I heard is that the load factor on the GVA-BKK route is quite good. GVA is a very lucrative place to fly to and TG is the only Asian operator in western Switzerland. The problem is the cost of the extra crew for the ZRH-GVA segment. A crew has to stay in ZRH and then fly ZRH-GVA-ZRH and stays in ZRH 2 days, before going back to Thailand. That's the problem.
Some times ago, I heard that Thai wanted to fly from BKK to BRU via GVA using MD-11 equipment.

By the way, do you know where are the plans for Swiss Sky For the Washington-Geneva-Kabul route?

And another question, maybe Unique or somewhere else will be able to answer, how is the load factor on the Swiss route ZRH - SIR - ZRH?

Thanks,


User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2282 times:

I thought TG operated this route as GVA-ATH-BKK.

Oh well...

Are they still going to fly MD11's into ZRH?



User currently offlineLumumba From Belgium, joined Mar 2001, 369 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2181 times:

Hi everybody.
Maybe it's like Brussels it was working very good (code share with SN) but because they enter the STAR alliance they started the new service with LH.
And from that time you had to fly thru Franfurt.
Regards
Pat



User currently offlineScf158 From Switzerland, joined Dec 2003, 413 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2132 times:

I hope TG doesnt drop GVA... its the only 744 that ive seen at GVA for a long time. They have been operating this route via ZHR for years I heard.

User currently offlineScf158 From Switzerland, joined Dec 2003, 413 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2126 times:

Does anyone have any oppinions on other routes that could open up to and from GVA?

User currently offlineRJ100 From Switzerland, joined Nov 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 30
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2094 times:

@Scf158: Helvetic Wings intends to start GVA-BSL (with ATR-42 operated by Farnair) and GVA-BRN (PC-12  Big grin ). But haven't heard any news of them recently.

Also I would guess that GVA-Valencia would be a nice market in the next years with all the "Alinghi" sailing happening...

RJ100



none
User currently offlineAirways From Switzerland, joined Mar 2001, 880 posts, RR: 12
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2052 times:

As far as I know, FlyBaboo is looking at a number of destinations right now. Furthermore, they're are in discussions about a second aircraft. New destinations could be announced in summer.

Michael


User currently offlineCV990A From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2034 times:

Please forgive me if this has already been discussed, but what is stopping TG from operating BKK-GVA non-stop with M11 or A333 equipment?


Kittens Give Morbo Gas
User currently offlineBoieng747-400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2001 times:

Hey,

It is true. Thai is dropping Geneva at the end of January. As stated above the main problem was the crew issue, each flight cost thai about $100K. Loads are actually doing well this year around 120 pax per flight compared to about 80 last year, by all means the flight could never be profitable via Zurich as it would need to be full from Geneva outwards to break-even.

Tomorrow Thai will be making a decision on the future of Geneva, several options exist which are to relaunch GVA around July/September but this time as an extension of Dubai where TG already have a crew base. Other options such as Brussels or Manchester are also possible.

It's pretty sad that Thai didn't give more time for this route to grow as it was starting to do well these last few weeks...

Tim


User currently offlineCopenhagenboy From Denmark, joined Sep 2001, 595 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 1860 times:

I know Geneva has a special status, with many international organizations, but to be honest, it always looked strange to me, that Thai was able to serve two cities in the same small country.

User currently onlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 16948 posts, RR: 48
Reply 15, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1815 times:

Tags are rarely, if ever profitable, especially if you have no fifth freedom rights. In this case, I don't think anyone has fifth freedom rights within a country. If TG can't make it profitable via another destination where it will have cabotage, then GVA will be cut. I'm not sure why they went in through ZRH...seems like a money loser from the start to me.


E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6659 posts, RR: 22
Reply 16, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1746 times:

extension of Dubai where TG already have a crew base

I guess they would get 5th freedom for this,Tim?


User currently offlineScf158 From Switzerland, joined Dec 2003, 413 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1634 times:

This is probably a silly question but why doesnt TG just do non stop BGK-GVA-BGK ?

User currently offlineBoieng747-400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1616 times:

Hey,

Dubai would of course have 5th freedom rights. Abu Dhabi is also a possibility. Fact is that as stated above the crew change costs soo much, that whatever thai does the route cannot be profitable via Zurich.

Just a little reminder of the story. October 28th 2002 Thai launches Geneva via Athens with B773 equipment. Thai expects to have 5th freedom between ATH and GVA but finally the greek government refuses in order to protect olympic. Following this thai decides that they will reroute via Abu Dhabi. Just as this is about to be done, the war in iraq starts and the flight becomes an extension of the Zurich flight using B744 aircraft. January 29th 2004 Thai cuts Geneva, even though loads and yields are improving. Thai will perhaps come back around July/September 2004.

It has to be said that the route was also limited on several points such as the fact that Zurich flights reserved a larger percentage of the seats blocking expansion from Geneva. The route has potential and unfortunately is cut right when it was starting to do well.

Tim



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Thai Airways 772ER posted Sat Nov 18 2006 08:29:03 by BOEING747400
Thai Airways Warns On A380 & Alitalia Partnership posted Fri Nov 17 2006 12:09:31 by Singapore_Air
Thai Airways From LHR To BKK Cabins posted Wed Nov 8 2006 18:59:08 by Chrisjdurber
Thai Airways Re-Consider A380 Order posted Mon Oct 2 2006 02:26:32 by PanAm_DC10
Thai Airways posted Tue Sep 19 2006 00:51:47 by AeroplaneFreak
Thai Airways - LHR-HKG (via BKK) posted Mon Aug 21 2006 16:25:09 by Keysman73
Thai Airways Serendipitous Publicity posted Sun Aug 20 2006 17:17:22 by Highflier92660
Thai Airways Going To Be Using A346 On JNB Route posted Sat Jul 29 2006 11:58:05 by SA744
Thai Airways B744 Incident at MAD Today posted Sat Jul 15 2006 18:48:57 by Skyteam2000
Did Thai Airways, SQ And JAL Serve YYZ? posted Mon Jul 3 2006 02:49:10 by KHKAIR