Slamclick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 67
Reply 1, posted (11 years 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3425 times:
Without comment on relative merit, but speaking capacity and range I'd say that the A-330 and 340 both fall somewhere between the 767 and the 777.
I believe that the 737-900 and the A-321 are more realistically competing with (and prevailing over) the 757. The larger versions of the 757 are competing with the smaller 767s and that, as Boeing obviously understands, is not good business. 757, gorgeous as it is, is a goner.
727 went away because it would have cut into 737 sales. LaSalle went away because it cut into Cadillac sales. It is just the way of it.
Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
Dw747400 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 1266 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (11 years 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3393 times:
I believe I saw that program too, and your right to be skeptical.
The A330 competes primarily with the 767 and some of the lighter and smaller 777 models. The A340 competes against the larger and heavier 777s as well as, with the NGs, the bottom end of the 744s range.
Justplanesmart From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 725 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (11 years 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3180 times:
Slamclick, you are a bit confused as to cause vs. effect. The production of the 757 is ending because it is not selling, mainly because of other aircraft that can do a similar job more economically. Same with the end of 727 production 20 years ago (gosh, has it really been that long?). Some production lines have been shut down due to fear of cutting into other aircraft sales, the DC-8 being a prime example, and the MD-80/90 and MD-11 to a lesser extent, but no manufacturer is going to stop making a well-selling product. Note that with the Long Beach planes I mentioned, production ended shortly after a corporate merger and were the aircraft produced by the company taken over.