Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Did LH Cancel PHX  
User currently offlineAirBerlin From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 98 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3067 times:

I just got back from PHX after flying LH from FRA. I had read earlier that LH was going to cancel this flight. I talked to some LH employes in PHX and they told me that LH was shutting down the station completly and that the flight was not going to be reopened. According to them the flight was always full. Also they said that LH made the mistake of using a 767 for a little while on this route that they couldn't fill up because of the Arizona heat. What could be the reasons that LH shutdown this flight even if it was full??

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline4holer From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 3018 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3006 times:

From what I understand, a large number of the passengers were tourists as opposed to more high yield business passengers. Which seems odd that this fact would make them lose money since airlines flying to pure tourist destinations do just fine on those flights. (Hawaii, Cancun, etc.)


Ghosts appear and fade away.....................
User currently offlineAirBerlin From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 98 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2961 times:

I think another reason could be that other cities such as Portland and Denver have subsidized their LH flight and/or have garanteed that that they will buy a certain number of tickets. Phoenix has not.

User currently offlineDCAYOW From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 602 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2861 times:

PHX was high volume but low yield. LH started service around same time they started DEN which was the logical hub to provide service to PHX. So much capacity into that sector of the country was a bit overzealous.

After 9/11 they scaled the service back considerably and its more difficult to make a less than daily service work.

BA has made PHX work with association with America West, LH had no such feed at PHX.

LTU should look at this market however if they have lower costs than LH.



Retorne ao céu...
User currently offlinePVD757 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3413 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2818 times:

LTU might be good at least for seasonal service. Their used to setting up temporary shop being a charter flyer. I cannot believe that someone could not at least do seasonal service.

User currently offline9V-SPF From Germany, joined Sep 2001, 1375 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2743 times:

I think a seasonal LTU or Thomas Cook service from FRA would be a great idea and a good way to pick up the huge tourist demand from Germany into PHX.
Both would have the capacities that are necessary to serve this route and I am also sure that they could fill up their premium seats (First Comfort/Comfort Class) pretty easily.

Daniel


User currently offlineRJpieces From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2663 times:

At PHX, BA gets most of the premium traffic and they have the America West feed.

4Holer, actually only Continental does well on their Hawaii flights AFAIK. The majors feel obliged to have these flights since that is where most Frequent Fliers use their miles. It is extremely low yield and that is why we see aircraft like 753s and 764s on these routes because they have lower costs.


User currently offlineAirbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8380 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 2584 times:

I have a friend who's a LH F/A, and they absolutely hated the PHX flight. Mostly they hated Phoenix as a city which made such a long flight something not to look forward to. That, combined with other things people said above might have helped the decision to stop flying to Phoenix.

User currently offlineAirBerlin From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 98 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 2542 times:

Most of the f/a's I talked to on the flight were sad that the flight was going to be cancelled. They liked Phoenix as a city (as do I) and they were going to miss the flight. Their only complaint was that LH was using the A343 that they leased from SN, they didn't know where anything was.

AL


User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 20
Reply 9, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2510 times:

Forgive me for being a little blunt, but there is a simple answer to all of these "why did X airline cancel Y service?" Think about it: it was not making money.

99% of the time, this is going to be the reason for service cancellation. It is very hard to make money in the airline business, and even if flights are full it doesn't mean an airline is turning a profit on a particular route. I don't care how big your city is, or how much business is there, there's no guarantee that there will be profitable international airline service. I'd love to see Air France back at DFW or Air Canada back at AUS, but both airlines simply couldn't make money on the route. When it all comes down to it, it's that simple.



"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently offlineLhr001 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2455 times:

LTU served Phoenix in the mid 1990's. The service lasted about a year or two! The Phoenix market is good.... Problem is low yield. The same came into play with America West flew Phoenix-Honolulu-Nagoya. Low Yields! British Airways is operating the 747-400 to Phoenix because frequency is dropping. Phoenix is the same as Las Vegas - Low Yield, Low Ticket Price!


LHR001


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Did TK Cancel IST-BOM 9/12 posted Wed Sep 13 2006 08:22:52 by Gokmengs
Why Did LH Dropped MUC-BKK-KUL? posted Sat Nov 19 2005 01:06:35 by Kevin
Why Did AA Cancel The EWR-LHR Run? posted Tue Aug 12 2003 02:51:57 by Tommy767
Why Did AC Cancel Flights To NRT, Not HKG Or P posted Wed Apr 30 2003 19:58:01 by Samurai 777
Why Did AZ Cancel The 744? posted Sat Nov 11 2000 23:38:23 by Shinseki
Why Did UA & LH Cancel Their 747 Orders? posted Sun May 29 2005 20:10:49 by TS
So Why Did My NW Flight Really Cancel? posted Wed May 4 2005 02:15:41 by TOLtommy
GE Partnership On The 77W - Why Did Boeing Do It? posted Wed Nov 22 2006 21:22:33 by AirbusA6
Why Did Virgin Drop Their Signature Tail Design posted Wed Nov 22 2006 12:01:26 by 777way
Why Did AQ 483 Divert To ONT? posted Tue Nov 21 2006 20:27:13 by Jrpreston