Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Could A USAirways America West Merger Work?  
User currently offlineKBUF737 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 779 posts, RR: 3
Posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 4745 times:

What does everyone think?

Strong east coast and west coast operations merging together could mean the saving graces for both airlines. Granted there is more than just route structures involved but, a strong network and base of passengers could lead to better and brighter futures.


The tower? Rapunzel!!!!!!
34 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12147 posts, RR: 49
Reply 1, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 4707 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Even tho HP is in better shape both financially and also in the public eye, I do not believe either one is in any position to merge right now.


You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineWorldTraveler From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 4668 times:

Those of you who suggest that HP will set up shop in one of US' hubs seem to forget that HP still has a gov't backed loan outstanding (I believe F9 is the only carrier that has repaid its gov't loan). The feds are not likely to allow HP to buy any other carriers assets (as co-signer they have that right) until HP repays or restructures the loans to remove the US gov't as a guarantor.


User currently offlineSlamclick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 3, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 4633 times:

The US Government already disapproved merger prospects for US because they would have been monopolistic.

Yes, that same US Government that allowed Boeing to buy McDonnell-Douglas its last remaining competition and allowed a merger between two oil companies each of which, pre-merger, had an office Christmas party budget that exceeded the gross revenues of US and UA.

US is likely to be euthanized for NOT being based in Texas.

I might be kidding about this.



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlinePVD757 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3418 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 4620 times:

I have ALWAYS thought that they would match up great. On paper, it's awesome, but in their checkbooks and on wall street, not so good. If there was a way to pull it off, I think it would be sweet. 737's, 32S', 757's, Mesa = lots of commonality. HP survives with WN in LAS and PHX because of it's low costs, US would immediately ruin that. If HP would BUY US and adopt their cost structure and trim the fat from US's assets, it could work.

User currently offlineCapt078 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 421 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 4612 times:

worldtraveler: while a conditiion of the loans is that the government has additional oversight of america west's operations, i do not think a proposal to acquire us airways would be blocked by the federal government any more because of the loans. while your mentioning of the loans is appropriate and relavent, i think your assertion that "The feds are not likely to allow HP to buy any other carriers assets" is mistaken. in fact, i would think that the feds would be in favor of this transaction more than that of another purchaser because then the government would have oversight over the newly formed larger carrier. also, do not forget that to get the loans, america west had to prove it had a business model designed to facilitate the repayment of these loans; a possible indication of a well run and potentially successful operation.

slamclick: the fact that the gov't turned down the merger between ua/us cannot be considered analogous to america west and us airways. the ua/us merger was disallowed because of the monopolistic pressence the new carrier would have had on the east coast. america west has virtually no east coast traffic, and us airways has no west coast traffic (except those flying transcontinentally), so the anti-trust issues become moot.


User currently offlineYegbey01 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1732 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 4594 times:

The problem is that they will have no hub in the middle of the country. They will be a east-west corridor traffic only will serve the north-south traffic on both east and west coats.

The middle of the country..... what will they do there


User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25556 posts, RR: 86
Reply 7, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 4578 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It is a condition of US Airways deal with the ATSB that the airline cannot merge with anyone until the amount owed (ATSB) is less than $500 million.

Presently, it is $900 million (ATSB), with little hope of any serious reduction soon, barring an asset sale.

So - US can't buy HP. Could HP buy US?

It is highly unlikely that the ATSB would approve of a merger between US and HP, because HP would have to assume US's debt.

This would put HP's debt on the ATSB backed loans at around $1.4 billion. Since US also owes other money, the debt load for HP would be very high.

cheers

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineGraham697 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 351 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 4573 times:

They could takeover UAs DEN hub, IF they fall or buy out Frontier. I really doubt the US gov would care, but I do doubt it would ever happen due to the cash needed. You never know though, one day at Gatwick you may see a HP A330 rolling down the runway!  Nuts


graham at TPA
America's Favorite Airport



Looking forward to the new AA
User currently offlineSlamclick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 9, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 4564 times:

Capt078

I guess my sarcasm needs work. The USG's vision of a monopoly is clearly subject to some factor other than actual squashing power over the competition. This is evidenced by the Boeing-McDoug acquisition and the Exxon-Mobil merger.

Perhaps that factor is campaign contributions? Perhaps it is based on the applicants having bigger legal staff than the USG? Anyway, it has squat to do with monopolies.

Every airline merger I have watched in the last 25 years has resulted in the immediate dismantling of one company's routes in a specific geographic region.



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineInnocuousFox From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2805 posts, RR: 14
Reply 10, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 4546 times:

This is simple enough... it doesn't matter if it could work... it's not going to be allowed to happen until HP get their own act together.


Dave Mark - Intrinsic Algorithm - Reducing the world to mathematical equations!
User currently offlinePVD757 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3418 posts, RR: 16
Reply 11, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 4537 times:

yegbay01: I agree that the mid-continent would be somewhat a hole, but look at where their presence would be: transcon, NE to Florida (low yield, buts lots of demand, hence my "costs" comments from my previous post), huge presence in some serious cities like PHL, LAS, PHX, LGA, BOS, DCA, etc. Having a good network doesn't mean service to every city, but HP could use the "fat" from US and fill in the missing pieces, where needed/warranted by good economic decisions and practices.

User currently offlineKBUF737 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 779 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 4496 times:

I agree that it could work with the east/west coast presence of both airlines. They could be hub focused on the coasts and then run point to point east-west routes where demand and profitablity could be the highest. It is unfortunate that neither is in the position to take the other over, because it would potentially be a strong carrier. I cant imagine what the name would be though?

USWest?
AmericaAirways?
USAirwest?

Callsign?
USCACTUS? Smile/happy/getting dizzy





The tower? Rapunzel!!!!!!
User currently offlineAa757first From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3350 posts, RR: 8
Reply 13, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 4488 times:

I bet the America West name would disappear to become US Airways.

AAndrew


User currently offlineBluewave 707 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3152 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 4432 times:

Why would the purchasing airline get rid of it's own name? America West should keep its name.


"The best use of your life will be to so live your life, that the use of your life will outlive your life" -- D Severn
User currently offlineCloudy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 4392 times:

These airlines are sufficiently different in culture that a merger would be a nightmare. Mergers are hard on the best of airlines in the best of times, even when the two airlines are closely related in business model, labor practices, etc. USairways until recently had one of the highest cost per available seat mile in the country, and America west had one of the lowest. The labor practices, pay rates and unions in the two companies are about as polar opposite as any two airlines in the country.

The result would be the likely death of both airlines.


User currently offlineAa757first From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3350 posts, RR: 8
Reply 16, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4368 times:

Why would the purchasing airline get rid of it's own name? America West should keep its name.

Because US Airways probably has more brand-recognition than America West. They are known in Europe and the Caribbean, where America West has zero service. Its been done before, ValuJet and AirTran. Also, in the banking industry, I'm pretty sure First Union purchased Wachovia

AAndrew


User currently offlineCapt078 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 421 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4311 times:

Aa757first: you beat me to it, i was just going to mention airtran and valuejet. there's nothing wrong with the america west name, but us airways is a name almost every household in america (particularly the east coast) recognizes. furthermore, while some airlines get away with it (eg northwest and southwest), it certainly would be better to have a name that does not present the impression that it is limited to just one region. us airways sounds like a national, transcontinental name.

User currently offlineLhr001 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4312 times:

America West has a much stronger name recognition on the West Coast, Hawaii, Aalaska and Mexico... You are forgetting that the US Airways name is still very closely associated to the US Air name which stood to confront many silly airline crashes and incidents. America West has in all of its 20 year history, had not one fatal accident! If the two were to merge there would be a much greater chance that the combined airlines would hold tight to the idea of a new name, afterall combined it would be a new and totally different airline.

Looking at the bases... Pittsburgh would be lost in the shuffle. Boston would be pondered off to American, Delta, Jet Blue or Northwest. The Shuttle sold to either American or Delta.. whomever has a more attractive price.. DCA would prove a hefty monitary return if the slots were sold to the highest bidder. Which in most cases would probably be a toss up between anyone. In the end you would have a base structure looking like LAS, PHX, PHL, and CLT!
New routes would be opened to bridge LAS and PHX to Europe. Routes such as LAS-LGW, LAS-CDG, LAS-FRA, LAS-FCO (Las Vegas surely would not have these frequencies on a daily basis... However, the demand for the international traffic is very strong in this market). PHX-LGW, PHX-CDG, PHX-FRA, PHX-AMS.

The fleets would easily be intertwined. America West 757-200, 737-300, 737-200, A320, A319. US Airways 767-200, 757-200, 737-400, 737-300, A330, A321, A320, A319. In the end the fleet would probably be based apon A330, A321, A320, and A319 types. Both America West and US Airways are very interested in the groth prospects using the A321! The A321 is due to replace the America West 757! The Boeing 737-400, 737-300, and 737-200 would have lack of commonality. The Boeing 767-200 is becoming aged!

The frequent flier programs are both very successful and would prove an enormous clientele base for the new airline. Flight Fund has several hundred thousand members. Dividened Miles has the same. The benefits would be outstanding. The question being is who or what alliance would be formed? More than likely One World... Reason being that America West is cosy with British Airways and US Air was at one time British Airways partner in the U.S. American would have plenty to gain by the addition of all of the West Coast code sharing they could gain via America West!

LHR001


User currently offline727LOVER From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 6557 posts, RR: 20
Reply 19, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 4239 times:

Texas International bought Continental, right?


Listen Betty, don't start up with your 'White Zone' s*** again.
User currently offlineAa757first From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3350 posts, RR: 8
Reply 20, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 4201 times:

America West has a much stronger name recognition on the West Coast, Hawaii, Aalaska and Mexico...

Hawaii: HP served Hawaii for three years. They ended service to HNL in September 1992. HP currently serves Hawaii via a codeshare with HA, like US codeshares with UA.
Alaska: Never served.
Mexico: This is true, but US Airways serves the Caribbean and Europe, where HP has never served. Doesn't flying America West to Philadelphia from Paris seem a bit odd?

AAndrew


User currently offlineAWA22 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 4069 times:

"Alaska: Never served"

HP has served Alaska in the past with seasonal service from Phoenix, after 9/11 the seasonal summer route was dropped. I worked the ANC flights numerous times during the summer of 2001 in PHX as a HP ramper. It was usually operated with a A319 and in the 1999 season was at times operated with a 757. It generally ran late June through mid-October. So yes HP has served Alaska.


User currently offlinePrinair From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 744 posts, RR: 2
Reply 22, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 4057 times:

Old dinosaurs that refuse to evolve should be left to die....

It will never happen... HP is has evolved into an efficient and profitable airline. They are still working on fixing and upgrading their customer service and route structure. It is evolving into a well managed airline.

US...this is just a huge old beast that refuses to change. It should be left to die in peace....

By the way, HP did serve Alaska.... I have flown on their PHX-ANC A319 service several times (last time Aug01).



PRINAIR : Puerto Rico International Airlines
User currently offlinePaddy From Taiwan, joined Jul 2003, 390 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4030 times:

Old dinosaurs that refuse to evolve should be left to die....

I agree. While my sympathies go out to the employees who will be affected, US's cancer is far too advanced to waste any more time or money on it. I think Bronner and Morgan Stanley are going to realize this and begin the fire sale sometime later this year or early next year. Even if US could be made to survive, it would be better for the industry if the relatively healthier airlines absorbed its assets. Back to the topic though, I don't see a merger happening. Period. No other airlines are in a position to take on that sort of an obligation, for obvious reasons. An HP/US merger is a great idea in theory but simply can't and won't happen in reality. Also, US is far too big of a mess to be attractive intact. As for who will pick up the assests, thats way too complicated an issue for most of us to even begin to figure out. There are so many variables. Same with what will happen to ex-US hubs. PIT will likely get burned but PHL and CLT are anybody's guess. One thing we can safely assume is that both Philadelphia and Charlotte will have plenty of service regardless of whether or not another airline picks them up as hubs. And in reference to the thread on the Charlotte topic: anyone who thinks that Charlotte is dependent on its status as a US hub for adequate service is clueless. So anyway, this US Airways dinosaur will become extinct and the others will benefit from it in the long run.



User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13702 posts, RR: 61
Reply 24, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3962 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

America West has a much stronger name recognition on the West Coast, Hawaii, Aalaska and Mexico...

Actually, US has a strong name recognition on the West Coast thanks to their ill-advised purchase of PSA. Granted, they downsized their West Coast operations dramatically once WN started moving in, but it's laughable to say that their name isn't recognized as a major brand on the West Coast.




"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
25 Elwood64151 : merger between two oil companies each of which, pre-merger, had an office Christmas party budget that exceeded the gross revenues of US and UA. An off
26 TI717 : Yes, TI bought CO. Kept the CO name.
27 Jmc1975 : A merger would never work due to the different cost structures and corporate philosophies. However, they would probably be the best match of any for a
28 Flyboyaz : Yikes that would make a mess! I doubt HP could buy the whole airline, I could imagine buying certain assets but not the whole thing. Besides that, US
29 Elwood64151 : Flyboyaz: Your statemtn of mgt being cautious with money reminded me of something: Most MBAs are taught to protect what they've got and increase value
30 Flyboyaz : Very good point Elwood, and I believe they are doing just that by introducing the transcon flights...it's a starter anyhow. But until we continue to p
31 Elwood64151 : Ouch! Well, at least your bag-tag printers can actually be used. At MCI, the entire time I worked for FL, we didn't know what printer to designate for
32 Flyboyaz : Hehe, well bag tag printers is another topic...we go through them like candy! All of our equipment needs upgrading..oh did I mention the ancient dot m
33 Elwood64151 : Sounds like the baggage office at MCI for USAir. They have IBMs from 1995 with Dot-Matrix printers that I'm sure are older. Maybe a merger wouldn't be
34 Necigrad : RE: HP and the ATSB loan, no HP can't buy ANYTHING from US. The ATSB loan required a business plan (as was mentioned). For HP to deviate from that pla
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Judge Says OK To UsAirways-America West Merger posted Mon Jul 11 2005 22:14:07 by KarlB737
Strategy Behind USAir-America West Merger posted Sun Jul 23 2006 21:00:52 by 777fan
USAir/America West Merger Vs. USAir/PSA posted Fri May 20 2005 09:13:50 by IslandHopperCO
US Airways-America West Merger To Hurt United? posted Sun May 15 2005 03:26:14 by Noise
Advantages Of A US Airways-America West Merger? posted Sat May 14 2005 04:29:17 by Noise
Air Wisconsin - USAirways - America West? posted Fri May 13 2005 16:47:07 by ERJ170
America West's Team Work Plane posted Mon Apr 1 2002 20:47:40 by AWA22
USAIRWAYS-AMERICA West? posted Wed Jul 4 2001 00:42:53 by Bobbydgg
America West Merger posted Wed Dec 27 2000 23:43:30 by B757300
America West-USAirways Merger Details Revealed posted Thu Jun 30 2005 02:46:55 by KarlB737
US Airways And America West Merger... posted Wed Jan 16 2008 10:46:29 by Jaws707
USAirways/America West Question posted Mon Feb 19 2007 05:08:55 by Chi-town
USAirways-America West Pilots Demand One Contract posted Thu Feb 1 2007 20:10:43 by KarlB737
Explanation Of US Airways And America West Merger? posted Sat Dec 2 2006 22:28:22 by Chi-town
Strategy Behind USAir-America West Merger posted Sun Jul 23 2006 21:00:52 by 777fan
USAir/America West Merger Vs. USAir/PSA posted Fri May 20 2005 09:13:50 by IslandHopperCO
US Airways-America West Merger To Hurt United? posted Sun May 15 2005 03:26:14 by Noise
Advantages Of A US Airways-America West Merger? posted Sat May 14 2005 04:29:17 by Noise