Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
What Do You Think Of The New Jat Colours?  
User currently offlineAdriaticflight From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2004, 404 posts, RR: 2
Posted (6 years 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2361 times:

What do people think of the new JAT colours? I think they are terrible. They should have kept the 1990s colours of the Socialist Yugoslavia colours.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mitrovic Uros
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Philippe noret




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank C. Duarte Jr.
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank Schaefer



Also what do people think the future for airlines in the balkans. Croatia Airlines seems to be doing well, Adria doesn't seem to do much, Air Bosna gone, Montenegro Airlines is tiny, Balkan Air is new and Tarom is all over the place. Maybe Jat will become dominant player??


36 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineAirOrange From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (6 years 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2294 times:

Cheap. Lost chance...

User currently offlineLeskova From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 6075 posts, RR: 80
Reply 2, posted (6 years 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2280 times:

Concerning the livery - this is one of the few times that I've actually found the previous livery better than the one replacing it... what were they thinking??? Don't we already have enough of those white, white and white liveries with a little bit of color in there???

About JAT becoming a dominant player - not really sure about that, but the customers that I had booked on JAT didn't really come back and make comments about how brilliant the flight was... it was more along the lines of "I was glad when we landed"...

But, in principle, I think they do have a chance of being one of the dominant players in the Balkans - but I guess that it'll take at least until the rest of the world doesn't associate the Balkans with the war there any more...

Regards,
Frank

P.S.: Welcome to a.net!

[Edited 2004-01-13 23:34:14]


Smile - it confuses people!
User currently offlineTeva From France, joined Jan 2001, 1827 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (6 years 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2261 times:

About the new colors?
1 word:
UGLY

Teva


Ecoute les orgues, Elles jouent pour toi...C'est le requiem pour un con
User currently offlineBoeing777/747 From Belgium, joined Dec 2001, 643 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (6 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2247 times:

I sometimes wondering what is going on in the heads of airlines' decission makers nowadays. First Cyprus Airways, than Ethiopian, JAL and NWA, recently Luxair and TED. Like JAT these are neither true improvements. They make a fool of themselves, of their airlines and above all of their passengers. This new JAT for example has nothing to do with "home carrier" branding. How should you feel as a Serb boarding this livery. Would you be proud to fly your national carrier?? Is an inexpensive aircraft paint design more important than image? Image is an important part of a successful marketingmix. Ofcourse airlines suffer heavy competitions today but that doesn't mean that a paint design has to look cheap.

VG Airlines, Australian Airlines, Gulf Air, (new)PIA, Qatar Airways, SAS, Sun Country and Continental Airlines were/are one of the finest liveries over the recent years. Chapeau for these airline identities.

User currently offlineA340pilot From Canada, joined Sep 2003, 576 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2232 times:

Anyone remember that game "connect 4" ?  Laugh out loud  Laugh out loud  Big thumbs up

** filler

** filler

** filler

Best regards,
a340pilot


Go! Canucks Go!
User currently offlineMd11lover From Switzerland, joined Oct 2003, 444 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (6 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2231 times:


I also think the new JAT colors are terrible. The older tiled one is much better and looks more elegant.
Dont know much about airlines in the Balkans, as far as their endeavors, and financial situation, but one thing is for sure, the Balkans, especially Croatia, are beautiful and they attract a lot of tourists, especially in the summer time. I flew Croatia Airlines from Zagreb to Dubrovnik on its 732, and well, i wasnt particularly impressed since the flight is quite short but i sure did have a great time in the Adriatic Coast.

Adriaticflight: Welcome aboard!!

Md11lover

User currently offlineAirOrange From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (6 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2221 times:

I still cannot believe this has happened. Btw JAT is not the only one in the world which messed up its identity. I agree with Boeing777/747, this JAT design has nothing to do with "home carrier" branding. I'm thinking to move to the Moon...

User currently offlineBoeing777/747 From Belgium, joined Dec 2001, 643 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2196 times:

Hey AirOrange, how could you forget to disqualify Avianca's latest livery?? Just as wrong as this new JAT.

User currently offlineQantasguy From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 112 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (6 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2193 times:

I think a kid must have designed them. It seems the same person may have designed TED.

User currently offlineAirOrange From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (6 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2176 times:

Okay Boeing 777/747, Avianca is neither a very good improvement. You'd better send all those airlines to me. Here is my airline design portfolio for you:

http://www.liladesign.com/portfolio.html

User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3371 posts, RR: 36
Reply 11, posted (6 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2174 times:

Of the liveries worn by JAT 737-300s past and present, my favorite is:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Philippe noret


Has a clean, modern look (whether we like it or not, "Eurowhite" is in vogue) with just enough color to liven it. And the JAT billboard title makes the aircraft instantly recognizable.

My best guess is that JAT will continue in its tradition of success on all fronts. Since ZAG, LJU, SPU and DBV are no longer in the picture as focus cities/hubs for JAT following the breakup of the Yugoslav Federation, it seems highly unlikely their fleet will ever reach the size of the pre-1990 JAT.

User currently offlineBoeing777/747 From Belgium, joined Dec 2001, 643 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (6 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2148 times:

Wow, impressive. Pitty that Luxair did not select one of you designs. Because what they have now is an uncontroled and weak "Eurowhite 13 in a dozen have seen before cheapo" livery.

User currently offlineAirOrange From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (6 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2129 times:

No comments Boeing777/747, these are your words. Keep it to the subject: JAT. I'm off line now, researching what airlines move to make such strange decissions.

User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10908 posts, RR: 70
Reply 14, posted (6 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2112 times:

Absolutely HIDEOUS. My gosh...looks like it was designed by a kindergartner. What on earth are they thinking?

This is MUCH MUCH nicer:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Philippe noret


What a shame................


"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineKlm-md11 From Greece, joined Mar 2002, 469 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (6 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2083 times:

what can I say...

The airline sucks big time...(read my trip report on them)

...new livery sucks even more!!!

horrible livery


GELUK IS GELUL MET EEN K
User currently offlineA330Fan1 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 856 posts, RR: 23
Reply 16, posted (6 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2076 times:

I definitely agree with those who chose the top-right one, I think it makes the plane stand out the most and is the most colorful and smooth livery.

-A330Fan1

User currently offlineAnsettAW From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 205 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (6 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2059 times:

Don't they have focus groups or whatever before making decisions like this? This is absurd...


Snap, Krackle, and Pop are thinly veiled emblems for the Trilateral Commission.
User currently offlineAlekToronto From Canada, joined Nov 2003, 328 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (6 years 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2046 times:

I personally think that this new livery makes JAT look like a Low cost Carrier. Maybe that was what they were trying to achieve? this could be in order to get business away from its neighbouring airlines i.e. CSA Malev LOT Tarom, etc...I don't think JAT will ever be as large as it was in the 80's, early 90's with DC-10's flying all over the world.

cheers!
Alek

User currently offlineMIAMIx707 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (6 years 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2017 times:

The current JAT livery is one of the few eurowhite designs I liked. Good, triumphant logo on tail and bold JAT letters.

These new funny clown dots belong in the circus. Hate the font even more

Air Orange, the only design I like of those is the VG.. which would almost be a classic had the airline survived longer. Mama air, crystal airways, Air holland and others are horrible (these are my words) no hard feelings  Big grin Airlines like Avianca, etc, should let real artists and designers from their own countries do that job of coming up with unique, classic liveries as it was once done.

too many blue tails with white/grey fuselages already, for a visually inclined aviation enthusiast like myself its a visual desaster.


Most latin american airlines today look like crap because they've given the airline restyling to foreign or modernistic/simplistic design firms with no creativity. Airline recognition isn't the same as home decoration







User currently offlineCB777 From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1195 posts, RR: 5
Reply 20, posted (6 years 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1996 times:

I don't know what JAT was thinking, this has to be one of the ungliest color schemes. My first flight was when I was 8 years back in 1987 and it was on JAT from JFK-ZAG. They were a good airline in the 80's and I don't see them being as good as they were before. I think this is the largest JAT will be, I don't see them being any larger. But they do need a another color scheme quick!!



CB777

User currently offlineTupozure From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 65 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (6 years 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1978 times:

Horrible, looks like a playschool kid painted the aircraft. The paint scheme on the top right photo is great. Simple and modern.

What does JAT actually stand for?

User currently offlineDuke From Czech Republic, joined Sep 1999, 1118 posts, RR: 2
Reply 22, posted (6 years 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1930 times:

...Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnng!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 Laugh out loud  Big grin  Laugh out loud  Big grin

But seriously, I am just glad to see some progress. The poor airline has suffered so much. Ah for the days when they flew to YYZ THREE TIMES A WEEK and had  Smile/happy/getting dizzy MD-11s  Smile/happy/getting dizzy on order. Good luck with the routes, JAT - sve najbolje!

User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (6 years 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1867 times:

I think a kid must have designed them


You're probably right - the livery was the result of a competition launched by JAT a few months back. The results were so bad that the judges actually said that none of the shortlisted finalists was good enough - so they went for a cobbled-together mixture which combined two of the entries.

And 'presto'...there's the result.

I actually came up with a couple of ideas myself, but never got around to sending them in. I wish I had now. Big grin

User currently offlineAlitaliaMD11 From Spain, joined Dec 2003, 4068 posts, RR: 20
Reply 24, posted (6 years 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1841 times:

Hey

i hate the new livery. The New livery is going to look horrible on a DC-10 or a 777 if they ever get around to painting it.


No Vueling No Party
25 Post contains images Flyboy_se: JAT isnt trying to be a homelandcarrier.After the end of country of Yugoslavia,JAT is focusing on becoming a international carrier.Thats the main reas
26 Sabena332: JAT's new livery is the worst I've seen lately, simply disgusting, it looks like a kindergarden group designed it! Sadly they also belong now into the
27 FutureFO: OK the new colors are nice but are they going to paint all the aircraft in the fleet or only about 1/3 of them as with the other livery. Sean from MCO
28 MIAMIx707: yes the other day the name of Yugoslavia was no more, so why still name it JAT airways.. which stand for Jugoslovenski (Yugoslavian) aero transport?
29 La Carlota: I honestly think they are UGLY. Plus the fact that the country is not called Yugoslavia anymore, but Serbia & Montenegro!!! What are they going to do
30 Sabena332: By the way, do the crew uniforms change as well? A clownsuit for the cabin crews would fit perfect with that livery. Patrick
31 Royal330: The old one was much better and I didn't like the old one. The new one looks like a livery of a low cost carrier.
32 Post contains images TriStar500: I could have pulled a better design out of my rear end, and I had a 4 (equivalent to a D in the American system) as a grade in my high school art cour
33 Flyboy_se: MIAMIx707 and LaCarlota: Originally JAT was standing for Jugoslovenski Aero Transport.The airline decided to remove the meaning of JAT but kept the n
34 MIAMIx707: Flyboy se: CSA starts with a C so it's good enough for Czech Airlines, Jat Airways still brings to mind the "Jugoslovenksi" Still, unfitting name and
35 Post contains images JU101: Flyboy_se, I have to agree with you for most of what you said. It was evident before the competition began, that JAT was in search of a new identity t
36 Post contains images Flyboy_se: JU101: am disapointed with the new identity aswell.Surprised that the people at Jat couldent come up with something more original.I just hope that the
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Do You Think Of The New First Choice Liverly? posted Wed Nov 19 2003 19:29:36 by Aircraft88
What Do You Think Of The New Piarco posted Tue Aug 19 2003 04:36:51 by Vkstealth
What Do You Think Of The New Tame Livery? posted Tue Jul 22 2003 08:14:53 by Kjet12
WHat Do You Think Of The New AA 717 posted Sat Oct 20 2001 20:28:16 by Delta2006
What Do You Think Of The New "Pax Bill Of Rights"? posted Wed Jun 13 2001 02:17:52 by LAX
What Do You Think About The New A330 Of Edw? posted Wed Dec 6 2000 15:54:08 by EDR 374
Fly Baboo, What Do You Think Of The Name? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 00:50:21 by Dambuster
What Do You Think Of The A350 Ads? posted Thu Oct 13 2005 02:56:39 by MarshalN
What Do We Think Of The New T1 In YYZ? posted Sun Aug 8 2004 06:40:04 by YYZACGUY
What Do You Think Of Qantas' New Image? posted Wed Mar 3 2004 14:36:03 by Qantasflyer