Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Mesaba Deal: 5.1%-26.7% Pay Hikes  
User currently offlineBeefer From United States of America, joined Jun 2003, 390 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2237 times:

Mesaba deal: 5.1%-26.7% pay hikes
Liz Fedor, Star Tribune

Published January 14, 2004

Mesaba Airlines pilots will get pay raises ranging from 5.1 to 26.7 percent under a contract agreement reached early Sunday morning.

The majority of first officers, who fly Saab turboprops and four-engine Avro regional jets, would get a pay boost of 13.4 percent when the contract is signed, according to a contract summary released Tuesday by the pilots union.

The average starting pay of a Mesaba pilot would jump from $17,352 to $23,542. Pilots at the top of the experience scale are expected to earn $94,483 under the new contract, which is comparable to $85,445 under the existing contract.

The union's elected leadership voted unanimously to recommend the tentative agreement to the airline's 844 pilots, who will vote on the contract Jan. 23-29. A simple majority is required for ratification.

The pilots contract came open in June 2002. Pilots will receive retroactive pay for 2003 but not for 2002. Union leaders said pilots will receive retroactive paychecks ranging from $450 to $6,300. First officers will get retroactive pay that equals 10 percent of their 2003 flight pay, while captains will get 5 percent of their 2003 earnings for their retroactive payments.

If the pilots approve the contract, Mesaba captains will get 5.1 percent pay raises when the contract is signed. The first officers would get increases of 13.4 to 26.7 percent, with the biggest pay-scale increase going to the new hires. The contract signing most likely would occur in late January or early February.

The tentative agreement spans five years and calls for 2 percent increases in years two and three and 4 percent increases in years four and five.

While pay was a critical issue for the pilots, job security was of equal importance, union leaders said.

For example, the new Mesaba agreement prevents MAIR Holdings, Mesaba's parent corporation, from using Montana-based Big Sky Airlines for expansion flying. MAIR acquired the small, Montana-based airline in December 2002, and MAIR CEO Paul Foley told Wall Street analysts in October that he wanted to diversify the company by finding airline partners for Big Sky.

The pilots union has altered Foley's plans. In a contract summary, Mesaba ALPA said, Big Sky will be "permanently limited to flying aircraft with 19 or fewer seats." Pilots at Big Sky are represented by the United Transportation Union.

The union said the tentative agreement also greatly improves the retirement plan for Mesaba pilots. Union leaders said they are pleased with the new contract because it puts their contract in the top tier with other major regional airlines -- Comair, Air Wisconsin and Atlantic Coast.

Full Story: http://www.startribune.com/stories/535/4317558.html
Source: Minneapolis StarTribune


15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBeefer From United States of America, joined Jun 2003, 390 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2174 times:

I'm surprised no one wants to comment on this topic.

It looks to me like the pilots did a good job of getting what they needed, yet not putting the airline in a bad position. New hires will definitely get the best end of the deal.

Also, if this deal allows Mesaba to get new aircraft from NWA as the story suggests, then Mesaba should be in pretty good shape for the future.


User currently offlineSyncmaster From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 2032 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2142 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I think it's great to see they came to a compromise. I also think that this will place Mesba, like the story says, with other major regional carriers.

User currently offlineAirT85 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2101 times:

So this means the Avro's are staying in the fleet? Good to hear!

User currently offlineBruce From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5056 posts, RR: 15
Reply 4, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2100 times:

sounds like they want to put Big sky out of business. theres not much growth in the 19 seat market.

bruce



Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7591 posts, RR: 27
Reply 5, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2040 times:

Hold on folks.....not so fast.....

This means absolutely nothing about the future of the Arvo, that will be announced by Feb 29 and has nothing to do with the contract.

Remember this is a Tenative Agreement, that has yet to be ratified by the pilots....

This is what I've heard so far, I'm sure others can add more comment....

Increases to first year FO's were decent.
Saab FO and CA pay is decent
Arvo pay is still subpar
Payscale for CRJ (if they are added in the future) - slightly below average

Days off and per-diem pay - not quite as expected

Overall, a decent contract for a turboprop operator, but would be below industy for an RJ operator.

--One thing I learned in the whole job market is to pay attention to benefits, even more so than salary. As what may seem like a low salary in terms of actual pay can be made up in good benefits. Especially health care, if you plan on raising a family, time off, and retirements.

I know some pilots aren't happy with this TA, some are, and some will never be happy with anything. So take it for what its worth. Everyone has their own definition of living comfortably and someone's poverty might be someone's fortune....err something like that.


User currently offlineIslandHopperCO From Micronesia, joined Dec 2003, 225 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2031 times:

Starting pay was $17K and now "improves" to $23K!?!?!? I thought pilots made big bucks! You can't live on 17K a year, and even 23K is a stretch. That's just awful. Pretty sad when the shift manager at McDonalds makes more than a pilot!  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

[Edited 2004-01-14 23:21:56]

User currently offlineAirdude66 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 187 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1978 times:

Just to keep this realistic. What will this contract cost in the long run?

The money to cover this must come from somewhere and it will not be from the profits built up in the bank.

The pilots all thought the MEM operation was awful and unsafe. Wait till you see the future staffing levels at outstations. This is where all the cuts take place. they are already evaluating outstations operating with 2 agents per flight after deice season - some stations are looking at the cuts now. Keep in mind - 2 people, this includes the manager on duty.

....but at least the pilots are happy, that is all that matters.


User currently offlinePA34plt From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 44 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1935 times:

At least nobody on this thread is complaining that airline pilots make too much money and in turn cause the financial problems that US airlines are facing...

User currently offlineCoronado From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1177 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1933 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Maybe this opens the door for some Embraer's to replace the Avro's? Northern routes especially in winter need the cargo and luggage hauling capacity of this class of aircraft. CRJ;s are a bit too light on hauling capacity.

We are all relieved and pleased that a deal seems likely to be signed off. It is a lon 8 hour drive from MSP to CMX! And NWA Mesaba is the only game in town!



The Original Coronado: First CV jet flights RG CV 990 July 1965; DL CV 880 July 1965; Spantax CV990 Feb 1973
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7591 posts, RR: 27
Reply 10, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1874 times:

It is very rare to have a CRJ weight-restricted, at least on the routes that NW operates them on. They don't operate them on too many routes that require a full fuel load. The ERJ's are actually WORSE in terms of weight restrictions than the CRJ's.

No, NW is not actively looking at the E170 or E190.

This deal is anything but signed off. Don't get too relieved. From what I hear, this is a good possibility this TA will be voted down.

Airdude - 2 people at the outstations per shift??? Thats news to me. Maybe in little po-dunk outstations like CIU, APN or Northern MN, but at the other stations no way. Plus if we're handling Pinnacle CRJ's and the Arvo's, thats a nightmare. That would surely cause performance to drop. How would Sr. Mgmt doesn't take their fat bonuses, plays a few less rounds of country club golf per week, and actually earns their pay like everone else.
Still, judging from your past remarks, I'm still rather skeptical....


User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3805 posts, RR: 29
Reply 11, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1858 times:

Sounds to me like those who just days ago jumped to the hasty conclusion that XJ's pilots had "caved" are now wearing egg all over their faces!

User currently offlinePVD757 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3413 posts, RR: 16
Reply 12, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1840 times:

The question should be asked, how much do the pilots think they can get, given the current economic conditions that exist? Not to make a mountain out of a molehill, and yes, I'm sure that management hasn't done their part, ya-da ya-da ya-da, etc. but there is only so much blood per stone.

User currently offlineBobs89irocz From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 632 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 1816 times:

I know several pilots at Chicago Express and there pay for an FO on the SAAB 340 is $17k a year. I personally think that a person that has 1300TT and no college that can get a job flying a saab for that pay is pretty good. Not only are they gonna be left seat in about 3 years but they can be making good money at a major with in about 6-9 years......in the airline industry i think these sacrifises are worth the time at the lower end of the pay scale. I think the Mesaba guys got a good deal. I didnt know that the Avro pilots made that much money. I wonder what the 146 guys make at Air Wisconsin. I fuel them everyday and have always wondered that. I know there RJ pilots start at $23k a year also so thats not to bad, but there also gone 4 nights out of the week.

User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7591 posts, RR: 27
Reply 14, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1797 times:

Bob,

Lets not beat a dead horse here.....

First of all regional pilots are no longer using the regionals as a stepping stone. Since the majors aren't hiring, they are stuck where they are, and we are now likely going to see many career regional pilots. They can't make low pay for their entire career.

1300TT and no college isn't going to get you hired these days. You pretty much need a college degree to even get an interview for a pilot's position.
Your observations might be a little skewed.

As I mentioned before, when looking at a job, it is just important to look at other benefits, even more so than pure salary. Issues such as retirement, days off, medical, etc need to be taken into account. I haven't seen the contract, some people supposedly have. Those are the important details, along with the salary. While they may have increase new-hire pay, they might not have done so much for higher seniority people. So what if XJ has the highest paid 1st year FO's, it doesn't matter when you aren't hiring anyone.

I'm not going to pass judgement either way on what I think, since its not my contract and its not my income. I'm just stating what I've heard mentioned and the grumblings going around. There are two sides to every story, and with all negotiations, there are a lot of company politics involved.


User currently offlineUsnseallt82 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 4891 posts, RR: 52
Reply 15, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1797 times:

I'm glad the pilots stuck it out and fought for something better. XJ may have the highest paid 1st year FO's, but that isn't saying much for a regional air carrier. My personal beliefs about pilot contracts are one thing as well. I would probably be one to just be glad for having a pilot position period, especially in the days of the world we live in now.

But, as said before, there are always two sides to every story, if not a thousand more. So, if this was an agreement that suited both parties, best of luck to the pilots and way to stick through it.  Big thumbs up

Cheers!



Crye me a river
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
UAL's Top Two Execs Nab 40% Pay Hikes posted Sat Oct 7 2006 20:48:47 by TinPusher007
AS Pilots Taking 26% Pay Cut posted Sun May 1 2005 04:35:44 by WeAreUnited
Mesaba Deal Could Be Near! posted Sun Jan 11 2004 06:34:42 by Beefer
Mesaba Makes A Deal With Mechanics posted Tue Oct 31 2006 20:39:57 by KarlB737
Mesaba Makes Deal With Flight Attendants posted Mon Oct 30 2006 20:11:29 by KarlB737
Pilots Union Reaches Deal With Mesaba posted Sun Oct 29 2006 02:27:25 by KarlB737
Mesaba & Unions; Still No Deal Yet posted Fri Oct 27 2006 19:41:26 by KarlB737
Easyjet Cabin Crew Pay Deal Agreement. posted Sat Jun 24 2006 02:43:59 by Art
No Deal Reached For Mesaba--Court Is In Session posted Thu May 18 2006 22:12:51 by LUVRSW
Judge OKs Pay Plan For Mesaba Executives posted Wed Jan 25 2006 15:28:18 by LUVRSW