Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The Start Of The End For US Airways...  
User currently offlineAkjetblue From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 790 posts, RR: 5
Posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5319 times:

US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. TO CONSOLIDATE PIEDMONT AND ALLEGHENY AIRLINE OPERATIONS

ARLINGTON, Va., Jan. 14, 2004 -- US Airways Group, Inc. announced today that it
will consolidate the operations of two of its wholly owned subsidiaries,
Allegheny Airlines Inc., and Piedmont Airlines Inc., with a target effective
date of March 31, 2004.

As part of the transaction, Piedmont Airlines will operate the entire de
Havilland Dash-8 fleet. Allegheny and Piedmont currently operate 82 Dash-8s,
with 41 flown by Allegheny and 41 flown by Piedmont, but the Dash-8 fleet size
will likely decrease as more regional jets are brought into the US Airways
Express network.

"We have an ongoing review of every aspect of our business to find ways to
operate more efficiently and compete more effectively, and the consolidation of
these two carriers will optimize the assets of both companies," said Bruce
Ashby, president of US Airways Express. "Turboprop aircraft will still have a
role in our network, but it is inefficient to have two wholly owned Dash-8
operators with duplicative overhead functions for a shrinking part of the
company. We believe it provides the best outcome for our employees."

Members of the US Airways Express management are meeting today with
representatives of the respective organized labor groups for Allegheny and
Piedmont to share details of the proposed consolidation.

The preferred option is to merge Allegheny into Piedmont, allowing for the
orderly transition of the Allegheny employees into Piedmont.

The other and less-preferred option would be a partial asset transfer to
Piedmont, the liquidation of the remaining Allegheny assets, and the shutdown of
the Allegheny operation. Ashby said this option can be avoided through the
timely conclusion of labor agreements about representation and work rules.

"Our focus is going to be on the orderly consolidation of the two carriers,
because that is clearly in the best interest of our employees, customers and
shareholders. The timeline is short because we believe it is best to resolve
issues quickly so that our employees have a clear understanding of what the
future holds for them," said Ashby.

The US Airways Express network comprises nine carriers operating more than 2,000
flights daily, serving nearly 150 destinations in the U.S., Canada, and the
Caribbean. The three wholly owned subsidiaries are Allegheny Airlines, Piedmont
Airlines and PSA Airlines and the affiliate carriers are Air Midwest, Chautauqua
Airlines, Colgan Air, Mesa Airlines, Shuttle America and Trans States Airlines.



Save a horse! Ride a Cowboy!
16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRjnut From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 1218 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5213 times:

How is this the "start of the end"?

It seems like a logical and sensible move to shore up their feeder system.


User currently offlineRyefly From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1396 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5173 times:

Actually, after reading that article, I don't think this news points as a sign to "the start of the end of US Airways". I think this is good news by pointing them in the right direction. This is something that should have been done a long time ago in my opinion.

User currently offlineDasheighty From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 311 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5145 times:

I dont get it im missing something  Confused

User currently offlineKYAir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 362 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5059 times:

This makes sense! I, too, see this as a positive sign. In some topics yesterday I referenced the loan covenants US must meet in the first six months of this year. This move should help efficiency, which will help reduce costs and help meet those covenants.


Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened - Dr. Seuss
User currently offlineAirways6max From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 494 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4938 times:

I think it's very inefficient to have nine carriers operate a commuter network. Seems that consolidating them is just common sense. There's been a lot of talk about US Airways going under, but they may pull through yet.

User currently offlineLeskova From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 6075 posts, RR: 70
Reply 6, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4864 times:

Seems like people will find something pointing to US Airways' doom wherever they want to find it... they're about to be admitted to the Star Alliance as a full member: another sign of impending doom???

As others have said - the system they have now is inefficient, they're improving it: where's the problem?



Smile - it confuses people!
User currently offlineDeltaRules From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3737 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4802 times:

I agree with what's been said above- this is more positive then negative. This isn't the "beginning of the end"...if the Shuttle had been sold, I'd then agree. They're condensing their Express carriers...the article said that "but it is inefficient to have two wholly owned Dash-8 operators", which is true. Why have 2 when you can condense Allegheny & Piedmont into one, which is what looks like is going to happen.

Can anybody tell me why it seems like some of the people on here actually want US Airways to go under?

DeltaRules



Let's Kick the Tires & Light the Fires!!
User currently offlinePiedmontGirl From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4771 times:

I think this sounds like something that should have been done years ago. This is a good step in the right direction and gives me a glimmer of hope that US may survive.

As ill with US as I may be on occasion, I have lots of friends who work there. I would hate to see them out of jobs at this stage of the game.

The combination of these two Express carriers doesn't sound gloomy to me at all.


User currently offlineAdam T. From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 957 posts, RR: 6
Reply 9, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4722 times:

To answer DeltaRules question- this is an aviation discussion board. You are going to have people that love this airline and hate that airline.

Personally...I love US Airways, its one of my favorite airlines, and I don't want to see it die at all.
But, there are people on here that would like to see that happen  Sad , which is sad but that is there opinion.


User currently offlineAdam T. From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 957 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4698 times:

I forgot to add this in to my post above......I'm not being sarcastic, I know it sounds like I am but i'm not ......didn't want to offend anyone  Smile  Smile

Adam


User currently offlineUSAIRWAYS321 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1847 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4459 times:

I believe this move is done for 2 reasons: One, it is more efficient to operate PSA and Allegheny as 1 airline rather than two, if they can't sell it. Two, one combined unit is mroe attractive to prospective buyers than two individual ones are.

Brett


User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7569 posts, RR: 43
Reply 12, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4383 times:

I agree this is a positive step. I guess that the reason why Akjetblue wrote "the start of the end" as the title of the thread is that this can also be seen as a desperate attempt to survive via cost-cutting at a time when there is a general perception that all is lost no matter what USAirways does.


Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlineHaveric From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1247 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4342 times:

This is a positive step that has been rumored around US circles for awhile. More consolidation of contract and in-house express carriers is needed. An entire jettison of Shuttle America is warranted, but that's for another thread.

User currently offlineAkjetblue From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 790 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 4196 times:

Hats off to Eddiedude...you read my mind


Save a horse! Ride a Cowboy!
User currently offlineHaveric From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1247 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 3943 times:

Why is a consolidation of long-duplicative operations desperate? Corporations do this every day -- that's how you cut cost!!! Nothing unusual about this at all.

User currently offlineIflyatldl From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1936 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 3849 times:

Sounds like they are going the way that Delta Connection went when they combined ASA and Comair(but let them keep their own identities). If it helps drive down costs, go for it!  Smile


Ah, Summer, Fenway Park, Boston Red Sox and Beer.....
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is This The Start Of The End For US? posted Mon Mar 8 2004 11:49:46 by Gilesdavies
Is This The 1st 744ERF For TNT Airways (Pic)? posted Fri Dec 1 2006 02:47:34 by AirplaneFan
The Never Ending PSA/US Airways Heritage Aircraft posted Thu Apr 6 2006 00:46:13 by AirframeAS
Is The A380 Useless For US Airlines? posted Sun Jun 9 2002 16:14:34 by Bobcat
No CRJ900's For US Airways - For Now At Least posted Mon Aug 14 2006 21:19:33 by Planemaker
Republic Buys 30 175s For US Airways posted Mon Jul 24 2006 14:40:14 by Lowecur
New Money Maker For US Airways posted Wed Jul 19 2006 03:06:39 by AirCop
A Dozen Reasons For US Airways To Pick Up 747SP's posted Tue Jun 27 2006 07:50:00 by Thegooddoctor
Whats Next For US Airways? posted Sun Mar 26 2006 19:26:18 by USAF757300
Rumor Time For US Airways posted Fri Jan 20 2006 07:17:21 by SonOfACaptain