MEA321 From Lebanon, joined Oct 2003, 389 posts, RR: 17 Reply 1, posted (9 years 11 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 3123 times:
Im sorry but I fail to see how Lebanon is benefiting from this?
Bahrain and Gulf Air will benefit very much as Lebanon makes an ideal transit stop for onward flights to Africa and even Europe. But Lebanon eastward? I can hardly see Bahrain as a transit stop for Asian Countries or even Australia.
Cedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 7808 posts, RR: 54 Reply 5, posted (9 years 11 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 3104 times:
"MEA doesn't even fly to Bahrain now." Exactly - it's not exactly going to revolutionise air travel like, say, a UK/US open skies agreement. (Although I flew on an MEA 707 from Bahrein to Beirut in 94, even then it was only a weekly service.)
That said, I think Lebanon's policy of allowing complete deregulation - anyone can fly to and from Beirut to anywhere else - is a great idea, as proved by the explosive growth of air travel to the jewel of the Med. It may seem to be at MEA's expense but increasing destinations and frequency increases visitors to Lebanon which is good for the country, and what's good for the country is good for MEA.
fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
MEA321 From Lebanon, joined Oct 2003, 389 posts, RR: 17 Reply 6, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3081 times:
Cedarjet brings up a good point.
Will MEA boost Lebanon economically as much as BEY itself? The answer is no. Lebanon needs the airport to be strong, and wants MEA to be on top. Needs always overcome wants, and so on, and so forth. I think that the Lebanese government made a good decision in deregulating because it has brought more traffic to Lebanon, and with it has attracted more business hence. Deregulation is also meant to weed out the slackers, in this case there is only one can be affected, MEA. We should be extremely proud that MEA has been able to survive under such a fierce environment.
Yegbey01 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1711 posts, RR: 3 Reply 7, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3077 times:
But for how long......
There are some serious market gaps in BEY right now... ZRH, BRU just to name a few. MEA needs to cope with the increasing demand soon before it's too late. if MEA doesn;t get its act together, it will fail miserabily in the near future.
BA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11150 posts, RR: 60 Reply 8, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3062 times:
I don't think MEA will fly to Bahrain when they fly to Dammam (DMM).
Dammam actually sadly has been losing flights on a yearly basis. Many people in the Eastern province of Saudi Arabia are driving across the causeway to Bahrain to catch their flights instead of flying out of Dammam and sadly the Saudi government is not doing anything to improve the situation.
Dammam King Fahad Int'l is Saudi Arabia's newest airport replacing the old Dhahran Airport that is now King Abdulaziz AFB.
However, Saudi Arabia hasn't done a good job marketting the airport and are pushing airlines to serve Riyadh and Jeddah instead, particularly the European airlines.
Operating costs and landing fees in Dammam are also very high, much higher than in Bahrain Int'l. Getting permission from the Saudi government to fly to Dammam is also much more difficult and time consuming. It is much easier to recieve rights to fly to Bahrain.
MEA actually does quite well in Dammam (DMM), they upgraded the service from 2x weekly to 3x weekly and I hear flights are always full. The only way I see them flying to Bahrain is if they decide to start Asia flights and want to make a stop in Bahrain, or if they discontinue Dammam in favor of Bahrain which I don't think they will do.
So I don't see this deal affecting MEA much, but it is good for Gulf Air and opens up new opportunities for the future.
"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran