Yanksn4 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1404 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3370 times:
Maybe they are too concerned on getting new passengers to fly with them. Also I don't think they can compete with the other US major airlines out there that carry cargo. Finally I don't think the A320's carry that much cargo anyway.
Nlink From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 313 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3300 times:
It adds a large division within the airline to manage it, developing procedures and having people trained to accept it and all the riskcs of fines from TSA/FAA for filling out paper work wrong. It takes more staff and in some instances more equipment and more space to rent so it probably just isn't worthwhile atm.
ONT 737 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 600 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3256 times:
Sure the A320 can hold more cargo than a 73G. However when you are flying JFK/BOS/IAD to the west coast there is not much room for pax and fuel let alone cargo. On the other hand WN's average trip legnth is only 537 miles....