Good Airport Signage
F9Fan From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 696 posts, RR: 3 Posted Mon Jan 26 2004 06:57:40 UTC (10 years 6 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2591 times:
Here is my criteria for good airport signage
Large, easy to read font
Informative without being cluttered
Easy to follow instructions
That said, here are some examples from airports I've recently been in.
DFW - horrible contrast (white letters on beige background). Fairly easy to follow, though.
DEN - Good contrast, signs well spaced. Arrows difficult to follow, especially near escalators.
FLL - Video paging boards difficult to read, especially if you are in a big crowd. Otherwise very good.
LAS - Excellent signage, except the signs are overwhelmed by the openness of the main terminal.
LAX - Could benefit from some more signage, but not bad.
PNS - good contrast, but the arrows are hard to follow (shaft of arrow too wide). Easy to follow, but it is a small airport so they don't need much.
DCA - Font too small, and lighting is uneven making them difficult to read.
I'd love to hear your comments about signage at other airports
BA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 1, posted
Mon Jan 26 2004 07:02:54 UTC (10 years 6 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2571 times:
Beirut International Airport is full of signs everywhere:
They are all over here in the departure hall:
All over here once again:
They are just all over the place. Infact they are too much...
But they are very easy to read with a normal black background and white text. Everything is always written in Arabic, English, and French.
Regards [Edited 2004-01-26 07:05:53]
"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
Trickijedi From United States of America, joined May 2001, 3266 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted
Mon Jan 26 2004 07:04:22 UTC (10 years 6 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2565 times:
Some airports with some of the best signage:
You know exactly where you are at these airports.
Its better to be on the ground wishing you were in the air than be in the air wishing you were on the ground. Fly safe!
Flashmeister From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2900 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted
Mon Jan 26 2004 08:27:01 UTC (10 years 6 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2535 times:
ATL has good signage, although it's hard to get lost.
SFO's signage, particularly in the unrenovated terminals, is confusing. The AirTrain is also confusing unless you study the route map first.
OAK is dreadful -- signage and terminal.
DUB's signage also could use some work, but once you get the hang of it, it's not bad.
AMS signage is good -- very clear.
LGA's signage is improving, and the switch to the Int'l yellow/green/black standard is a good thing.
DCA signage is clear and easy to use -- also somewhat follows the Int'l standard.
PDX's signage is alright, but they rely too much on icons with tiny descriptors underneath them. They also make stupid mistakes -- the name of the airline is "Southwest", not "SouthWest".
M404 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2224 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted
Mon Jan 26 2004 08:39:06 UTC (10 years 6 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2520 times:
You hit on one of my pet peeves. I used to wonder why so many passengers asked the same questions. Simple - Bad signage. The simplest answer would be an international system used at
ALL airports that is the same everywhere. That way we all know what to look for after a few flights. Same pictures, same colors. Same size. No fancy tries to be different. We need to work on this, especially in America, as we promote a global marketplace. No airport could call itself International until it meet standard signage codes. The need is glaring and the answer COULD be starring us in the face.
Less sarcasm and more thought equal better understanding