Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airbus 321 Long Range  
User currently offlineFlyboyaz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 4 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3138 times:

Just looking for opinions....

Now that Boeing has decided to end the 757 line, does anyone think that Airbus will consider "beefing up" the A321? While they both hold similiar passenger loads, the 321 cannot fly as far and does not have as good takeoff performance as the 757.

As far as carriers are concerned, I was thinking of my own HP in particular, who would probably be interested in the 321 as a 757 replacement, but would need it to have better performance. I definetely think HP needs a 200 seat airplane that can fly longer distances. For example on our new BOS-SFO nonstop, we are using a 757 from BOS-SFO and the 319 on the reverse. They do not think the 319 can fly the 6.5 +/- hours to the west coast without penalties. Also they are considering upgrading the PHX-SJO flight to a 757 due to severe weight restrictions we've been having (as well as super high load factors!).

Any ideas of how this could be done?

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineAa757first From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3350 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (12 years 4 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3028 times:

Isn't it easier just to buy some used 757s?


User currently offlineAv8rDAL From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 474 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (12 years 4 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2975 times:

It could be a good idea. Other routes on which it could be used are some of the lower-density transatlantic routes currently served by 757s like CO's and soon to be AA's BOS-MAN service starting later in the year. I'm not saying that they should or are going to drop the 757s, but just that it's possible for a 321 to serve the same route. It might prove to be lucrative for some European carriers to operate out of smaller markets to US gateways.

Maintain thine airspeed, lest the Earth rise up and smite thee.
User currently offlineFlyboyaz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 4 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2960 times:

Sure it would be easier to buy used 757's and they might well do that...but what if a carrier wants to consolidate it's fleet?

User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 79
Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2850 times:

The 319 is far more capable of flying BOS-SFO than the 321 is, although both frames are perfectly up to the task.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus Pitches Long-range A340 To Qantas posted Thu Oct 27 2005 06:43:09 by Sq212
Seattle PI: Airbus Vs. Boeing Long Range Jets posted Wed Feb 4 2004 12:20:33 by United777
Airbus A330-300ER Powerfull Long Range Variant posted Tue Dec 9 2003 22:15:03 by Keesje
Why No Long Range Airbus For BA? posted Sun Nov 9 2003 13:45:40 by EGFFbmi
UA 757s Long Range International Flights? posted Tue Sep 5 2006 05:59:40 by MIAUA777
Long Range, Comfortable RJ posted Mon Aug 28 2006 18:29:14 by Boston92
Small Planes Equal Long Range? posted Thu May 18 2006 22:03:01 by ContinentalGuy
Could Airbus Make A Shorter-range A350? posted Sat May 13 2006 20:42:55 by 1337Delta764
Bwia Long-range posted Sat Apr 8 2006 21:02:55 by BA747YYZ
B737 / A19 Flying Long Range - Special Version? posted Wed Mar 15 2006 04:16:03 by GBan