Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LAX 2003 Passenger Counts Lowest In 9 Years  
User currently offlineFATFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6006 posts, RR: 27
Posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2637 times:

2003 passenger counts at LAX continued to slide to the lowest in 9 years.

Additionally, LAX now only handles 71% of Southern California traffic, compared to 88% in 1960 and 77% in 2000.

Area airport passenger counts in 2003:
LAX 54.9 million
BUR 4.7 million
LGB 2.9 million
SNA 8.5 million
ONT 6.5 million

Full article at:
Free registration may be required to read the article.

"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineAirxLiban From Lebanon, joined Oct 2003, 4536 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2613 times:

my first instinct is to say: good.

LAX is really a mad place. its good to see that burbank long beach john wayne and ontario are being used more than in the past. no doubt jet blue has something to do with LGB's 2.9 million...

User currently offlineFlyingNanook From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 830 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2562 times:

I'm tempted to say yippee! But then again, LAX provides most of the economy to Westchester (the part of LA where it is located). And having grown up there, I don't want to see it decline.

I'm pretty sure part of this is the fact that LAX needs to expand and the people of Westchester won't allow it. But that's understandable.

I am glad that the other area airports are seeing business though. That means less traffic on the freeways around LAX.  Smile But when I'm visiting family in LA, I will always use LAX because they live less than 15 minutes from there.

Semper ubi sub ubi.
User currently offlineDeltaflyertoo From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 1744 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days ago) and read 2468 times:

Personally I don't know why people think LAX is a zoo... I flew out of LGB on Jetblue for the first time 3 months ago and I hated it! That was a zoo! You still have to have remote parking, the terminal is just ghetto... the only convience is walking, you don't have to walk! But at LAX parking is very organized both on site and off and the only difference is having to walk a little further from gate to curb. Plus you have so many more flight choices..

User currently offlineMunich From Germany, joined Mar 2002, 155 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2405 times:

Don't worry!,In 2003 a lot of International Airports will drop down in passengers volume. The main reasons are the war in Iraq and SARS. I think this year, if there are no new reasons, the figures will be recover.

I give you some airports from the worlds top 30 where the figures for 2003 are already known.

LHR -0,18%, LAX -2,25%, FRA -0,2%, CDG -0,74%, AMS -1,61%, HKG -21,17%, MSP -1,74%, BKK -6,24%, MIA -2,35%, SIN -14,77%, PEK -10,16%.

LAX is an big hub for far east flights and there was a big decline.

Regards! Robert alias munich
User currently offlineBa319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 8743 posts, RR: 53
Reply 5, posted (12 years 4 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2392 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It shows too.

The first time i visited LAX on a spotting trip it was mad,i had a great time.The last trip was just over a year ago,the traffic was much slower.

Quite sad.

User currently offlineFATFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6006 posts, RR: 27
Reply 6, posted (12 years 4 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2325 times:

While some traffic at LAX is down due to more international concerns, I found this quote from the article about the number of flights lost at LAX interesting.
"Today, LAX is serving 18% fewer passengers than it did at its peak in 2000. About 54.9 million travelers visited the world's fifth-busiest airport last year.

The falloff is due largely to a move by United Airlines and other carriers to cut flights after the 2001 terrorist attacks. Only Lambert-St. Louis International Airport, Washington Dulles International Airport and Boston's Logan International Airport lost more flights than LAX in the last 2 1/2 years, according to FAA statistics.

Traffic fell further at LAX last year after fears about SARS — severe acute respiratory syndrome — prompted Asian travelers to stay home and airlines that serve Asia to slash flights. LAX handles more flights to Asia than any other U.S. airport.

"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LHR JFK On AA Lowest Fare In 6 Years... posted Tue Sep 30 2003 11:14:55 by Aaer 777
LAX "new" Check In Policy? posted Mon Nov 27 2006 20:23:55 by USflysagain
FR: No Polish LoCo In 3 Years posted Fri Jun 9 2006 23:08:05 by Humberside
Sports Charter Passenger Counts (?) posted Thu Jun 8 2006 20:53:52 by Boeing Nut
PIA To Acquire 29 Planes In 3-4 Years posted Mon Apr 17 2006 06:46:41 by Jacobin777
PHX To Europe In 3-4 Years? posted Thu Mar 23 2006 07:48:02 by Stirling
Emirates Departures Up To 672 From 463 In 3 Years posted Wed Mar 22 2006 22:36:15 by PlaneHunter
Legacy's In 5 Years posted Sun Jan 15 2006 17:12:43 by Dc10s4ever
SAS OSL-BGO 10 000 NOK Fare (1500USD) In 2-3 Years posted Wed Jan 11 2006 11:09:58 by OyKIE
Sterling "to Double In Size In 3 Years" posted Thu Nov 10 2005 13:22:44 by 7LBAC111