Fourstripe From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 97 posts, RR: 0 Posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2542 times:
I was wondering if it is ok to use a handheld scanner in-flight on the U.S. major airlines. I know many airlines have an audio channel that is connected to the aircraft's radio but others (like AA) do not. Is it legal to use a scanner while in flight? Also, does anyone know where you can buy some good and inexpensive scanners online.
“Aviation is proof that given, the will, we have the capacity to achieve the impossible.” - Edward Vernon Rickenbacker
RareBear From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 553 posts, RR: 0 Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2465 times:
I don't think a scanner is legal to use airborne. I'm not 100% sure, but you could check with the airline. There's a list of equipment that is allowed in the in-flight magazine, but since I don't use a scanner, I didn't particularly notice if they were on the list or not.
Aerlingusa330 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 347 posts, RR: 0 Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2445 times:
I have a handheld scanner and I once asked an aviation guru at IAD and he said that it could only be used in the terminal and not in the aircraft. I wouldn't bet all my money on his answer and I'd check with someone else. (Personally I don't think they harm anything if used in the air-except maybe physically hitting the f/a) The scanner that I have has an engraving in the back of it on a piece of metal that says that it cannot interfere with any radio signals and cannot transmit anything (like a regular handheld radio/walkie-talkie). Sporty's Pilot Shop has a fair amount of scanners, but I think the cheaper priced one - the JD-100 that I have has been discontinued. www.sportys.com/pilotshop
Shamrock 136 heavy cleared for takeoff runway niner.
Nwairlinkfo From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 54 posts, RR: 0 Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2119 times:
Although certain types of electronics are prohibited from use during flight by the FAA....EX: Cell phones, AM/FM radios, TV's ect, scanners are not one of the prohibited items listed...officially. As long as you do not have the type of scanner that includes a transmitter as with what is caller a transceiver it will not harm digital avionics equipment. The closer you sit to the magnetically sensitive AHRS units...the more harmful transmitters/radios ect will be. Although they probably don't pose much of a risk to any modern airliner all you should have to do is ask one of the pilots (through the FA) and I'm sure they would be more than happy to let you use it. Keep in mind it would be extremely difficult to find the actual frequency that your flight-crew is currently using, as they are always being handed off. I suppose it would be possible though if you had a good freq book Happy listening!!
Yes, it's made in China (but then again, what isn't? ), runs on 2 AA batteries, and has a 3V DC and earphone jack. It doesn't have squelch, but, so what? It's the best priced radio I've seen out there and I've had it for one year, and it works beautifully!!! If you are going to use it in your home, I highly recommend getting a universal DC adapter for this radio, save your batteries for when your hidden near a runway threshold spying on the ATC.
Oh, and whether you can use it or not in the plane:
Use it, when has the NTSB blamed a RECEIVER for crashing a plane? This thing is pocket sized, just use earphones in such a way so that a mean, nasty i-hate-radio-scanner looking F/A won't notice. Otherwise, just ask the F/A if you can use it with a sad big-eyed puppy look.
Nwairlinkfo From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 54 posts, RR: 0 Reply 12, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 2055 times:
Good point....but if you were on that plane you might care if it caused an accident. The NTSB is re-active....meaning it acts AFTER an accident to see what caused it. They do not issue regulations before hand. But I agree with you that it shouldn't cause a problem, just let the flight crew know and they won't care!
Delta-flyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2676 posts, RR: 7 Reply 13, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 2033 times:
Here's the official word from the FAA .... (FAR 91.21)
§ 91.21 Portable electronic devices.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may operate, nor may any operator or pilot in command of an aircraft allow the operation of, any portable electronic device on any of the following U.S.-registered civil aircraft:
(1) Aircraft operated by a holder of an air carrier operating certificate or an operating certificate; or
(2) Any other aircraft while it is operated under IFR.
(b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to -
(1) Portable voice recorders;
(2) Hearing aids;
(3) Heart pacemakers;
(4) Electric shavers; or
(5) Any other portable electronic device that the operator of the aircraft has determined will not cause interference with the navigation or communication system of the aircraft on which it is to be used.
The clincher, of course, is (b)(5), and every airline has its own list. Advisory Circular AC91.21-1A (dated 10/02/00) provides guidance on how an operator can determine what is allowable and what is not. It also rules out any device that is intentionally designed to transmit - including cell phones, CB radios and remote control devices.
Individual airline web sites provide more specific information on what is allowable and what is not. For example, CO specifically prohibits the use of cameras below 10,000 feet, while DL does not. For the first time in my life, last Friday, an FA told me to put away my camera on a CO plane while taxiing because she said it is "prohibited by the FAA".
Fly2hmo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 14, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2030 times:
well, I think as long as nobody turns on a transmitter, there shouldn't be any obvious hazard. And yes, before any scientists blast me, I am conscious that every electronic device produces electromagnetic waves. I only think an airplane does more harm to people with pacemakers than does a cdplayer does harm to a plane.
Captjetblast From Argentina, joined Aug 2001, 280 posts, RR: 0 Reply 16, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1955 times:
"... For the first time in my life, last Friday, an FA told me to put away my camera on a CO plane while taxiing because she said it is "prohibited by the FAA..."
As for cameras, they don't pose a threat to navigation at all, maybe they (FA) are instructed not to let you record something you shouldn't. Let's say something happens, from an incident to an accident, which must be further probed. Your movie could be an invaluable clue to investigations, ... or perhaps something no common people should ever know...
Delta-flyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2676 posts, RR: 7 Reply 17, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1908 times:
Capt ... in the Advisory Circular I mentioned above, there is some language about prohibiting the use of certain electronic devices during the safety instruction because it distracts people. I guess that refers mostly to CD/tape players, as they have earphones that would prevent people from hearing instructions. The CO website specifically prohibits camera use under 10,000 feet under their "portable electronic devices" section.
Douglas DC-9 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 303 posts, RR: 2 Reply 19, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1846 times:
That's like when you are on approach or taxiing, the crew asks you not to use an MP3 player or a Gameboy or anything I don't put it away. I mean I don't play Gameboy or anything but like my iPod, I don't put it away and the F/A's really don't seem to care or even bother to say anything.