Killerbabe From Netherlands, joined Aug 2003, 186 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 5 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 3261 times:
It is that new ( ?) flight from SQ and the A340-500B are used......
I am wandering how long the flight will continue. It is to long for me and a stop on the route ( Tokyo or Taipei) is a great and better alernative...
Coronado From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1275 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (11 years 5 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2733 times:
Why would you want to spend 24 hours fliying just so you can walk around like a zombie at Narita for an hour and a half or so. What does that do to improve your health. Especially when the Econ seats thru Narita offer you a 31/32 inch pitch. I would much rather get it over with in 18 hours non stop if I can enjoy a 37 inch pitch and a wider seat.
Way to go SQ. How about bidding for LA -Joburg non stop!!
The Original Coronado: First CV jet flights RG CV 990 July 1965; DL CV 880 July 1965; Spantax CV990 Feb 1973
GuyBetsy1 From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 843 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2500 times:
For a brief outlook on the diagram, go to http://www.singaporeair.com and click on the diagram : "Making the world a smaller place" featuring the Airbus A345 Leadership. You will then be directed to another window where you will see the approximate flight paths of SIN-LAX, LAX-SIN and SIN-NYC-SIN.
MD80Nut From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1018 posts, RR: 8
Reply 13, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2131 times:
If it takes 24 hours or so to do a one-stop from L.A. to Singapore, then being able to cut that to 18 hours or so is definitely worth it. Especially if you're flying economy, you get a 25% shorter travel time AND wider seats with more leg room and a leg rest. Sounds good to me!