Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
United Airlines: Why No SFO-MNL?  
User currently offlineAs739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6124 posts, RR: 23
Posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4335 times:

I was wondering why UA no longer served Manila, and why they don't fly SFO-MNL with a 777 or even 744? Daly City near SFO here has the highest population of Filipino's outside PR and yet only PR flys the route. PR is not very popular with the Filipino's as well? Is it just a flight with to low yeild?
ASSFO


"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFA4UA From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 812 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4239 times:

three questions:
1. How are cargo bookings for such a route?

2. Are there Business interests in supporting such a flight (ie corporate contracts for bookings)?

3. Is it cheaper/ more return for our alliance partners to run it and for us to get a kickback for the bookings we provide them with?

FA4UA



The debate continues... Starwood or Hyatt... which is better
User currently offlineSR 103 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1740 posts, RR: 39
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4188 times:

UA used to fly to Manila from San Francisco. I used to live in Manila and flew them a few times on my way to BOS. The flight was operated by a 747-400 via Seoul. Around 1997 they cut the route. I can't imagine it was for the lack of demand, but maybe rather for the poor yields. The MNL-SEL portions were rarely full unless it was a holiday time of year.

Also as of right now, I hardly see United trying to re-start their service. If the Filipinos want to avoid PR (as most people do), they can just fly NW or CX one stop via NRT and HKG respectively. JL/NH/OZ/CI/BR are alternatives as well.

SR 103


User currently offlineUA744Flagship From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4138 times:

Terrible Yields.

Also, given UA's large Chicago/San Francisco/LA presence, and the large amounts of Filipino workers in those metropolitan areas, this flight was full of non-revs!

May I add, Filipinos, when going home, avail of *every possible pound* of allowable checked baggage. So there wasn't much Cargo revenue-generating potential either. Big grin


User currently offlineSpeedbirdyvr From Canada, joined Mar 2003, 168 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4139 times:

UA used to fly MNL-NRT-USA when they took over PAN AM's transpacific operations. Then they added MNL-SEL-SFO, serving MNL 2x a day, but then dropped the NRT flight in 1994. I think it would have been more convenient for connecting PAX if they kept NRT instead of SEL, but NW and PR were really aggressive back then (NW at one point served MNL 3x a day - all 744's!), so I suppose it was due to too much competition. Hopefully they'll be back in MNL again one day, especially because they have good reputation in the Philippines. I know some TA's in MNL would book their pax on CX/PR to HKG to connect with UA's services to SFO, even if it is more expensive than NW or JL via NRT.

User currently offlineSpeedbirdyvr From Canada, joined Mar 2003, 168 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4116 times:

"May I add, Filipinos, when going home, avail of *every possible pound* of allowable checked baggage. So there wasn't much Cargo revenue-generating potential either."

This is a good potential source of income if they strictly adhere to their baggage allowance rules. PR charges $150 (I think) for each extra piece of baggage.


User currently offlineThrust From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 2688 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4110 times:

I know this is out of the question, but how does NWA fly their 757s to Tokyo-Narita? I was told they didn't go to Guam. Since an airliner like the 757 is not capable of flying nonstop over the Pacific to NRT from the U.S., how do they get there? Anchorage?


Fly one thing; Fly it well
User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4026 times:

ANC-NRT is a touch over 3400 miles -- no problem for ferrying a 757.

Steve


User currently offlineClipper001 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3965 times:

Didn't United's cargo division operate Manila as a cargo-only destination? I thought I recall United had 4 cargo-only DC10s that they used from the US to the Pacific via Anchorage.

User currently offlineFA4UA From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 812 posts, RR: 20
Reply 9, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3962 times:

SFO-MNL would be an ideal route for the 7E7... just get a few corporate contracts, books a bit of cargo and off they go!

hopefully someday...

FA4UA



The debate continues... Starwood or Hyatt... which is better
User currently offlineN751PR From Japan, joined May 2002, 1249 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3938 times:

I still remember flying UA from LAX-NRT-MNL and MNL-SEL-SFO-LAX. (at first I thought the SEL flight was uncommon but this thread sort of cleared it up.) As much as I love flying with PR to the Philippines, I really miss taking UA to MNL....  Crying

Clipper001, yes they did fly to MNL from ANC............well at least according to my old Hemispheres magazine from 1995.



"Ladies and Gentlemen it's happy hour. You will get two approaches for the price of one."
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LAN Airlines: Why No Pics At Heathrow In Database posted Sun Sep 10 2006 12:28:18 by BA787
Why No Any Of The Indian Airlines In SFO? posted Mon Sep 5 2005 20:08:40 by SQ2
Cleveland Burke: Why No Airlines? posted Wed Jul 12 2006 21:42:15 by SBNair3022
Why No Helicopter Airlines? posted Wed Mar 8 2006 23:12:21 by Phuebner
Why No Late-night JFK-SFO/LAX Flights On UA/AA? posted Fri Feb 17 2006 06:47:30 by RJpieces
USAToday: Why United Airlines Will Fail Again? posted Thu Feb 2 2006 21:11:07 by Douwd20
SFO-YEG New Service...why No AC Codeshare? posted Sun Jan 15 2006 02:47:22 by Yegbey01
Why No Pax Pvt Airlines To India posted Sun Nov 13 2005 10:59:06 by HAWK21M
Why No US Airlines Fly To Iceland? posted Mon Sep 12 2005 06:59:44 by Whataboutme
Why No Virgin Drinks On All Virgin Airlines? posted Mon Aug 22 2005 23:38:54 by Sabena332