Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airports Ready For A380  
User currently offlineFuffla From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 401 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4448 times:

I am interested to find out how many airports are already or just about to plan to make it compatible with the A380. Do any airports need major renovations? What are your thoughts?

18 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineEham From Netherlands, joined Sep 2003, 450 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4370 times:

I believe Amsterdam Schiphol is ready for the big-bus  Smile

User currently offlineMark_D. From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 1447 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (11 years 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4295 times:

I guess it's still too soon to say what the overall count worldwide is going to be -- probably at least a dozen or so airports still taking a 'wait and see' attitude since they're not even sure if they're even going to get A380 flights in or not. But in Montréal's case anyway it looks like the airport -- after some four decades straight of having almost consistently bad luck and timing and even stupidity with the airport infrastructure decisions made -- seems to be finally on a roll now the other way with current construction plans and their suitability both now and into the future.

The transborder pier opened up almost exactly a year ago was one of the first major pieces of world airport infrastructure to cater to post-Sept.11 U.S. Department of Homeland Security requirements almost from the ground up , and in addition it's just about tailor-made for the traffic mix it gets and may ever be expected to get (a few turboprops at the back end, a few small mainline narrowbodies at the main facade, and a whole pile of RJ traffic in-between).

And now with the new adjoining new International pier adjoining it, due to open in about sixteen months' time, the gate and lounge facilities for the soon-to-be AF A380 gate just about being enclosed by windows and insulation by the workers now. YUL-CDG is supposed to be one of the very first --if maybe even the first -- A380 route going, so getting the gate infrastructure ready by the middle or even third quarter of next year will fit in nicely if the plane's ready for service in time for the summer rush of 2006.

For the airport runways and taxiways it seems there'll be almost no accommodation work to do for it, as taxiway echo is super-wide right now (it used to be a runway itself once), and for the runway they'll almost be forced to use 11,000ft 24R/06L exclusively which should be good enough, as is. The turnbacks at either end seem wide enough for an A380 right now, as well.

So all in all at YUL the A380 capability seems quite well-integrated with the current construction work underway generally.

User currently offlineA3xx900 From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 335 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4264 times:

Since Lufthansa ordered some of them, they designed the new Terminal 2 at MUC to accommodate the A380. I'm not sure tho if T1 is capable of handling it so other airlines than Star Alliance can fly the A380 to Munich. But there won't be a market to do this in the near future anyway.
But, MUC is ready for the big bus!

Why is 10 afraid of 7? Because 7 8 9.
User currently offlineFuffla From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 401 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4269 times:

Thanks for the information Mark, it was very helpful. Sydney Airport knows it will get A380 traffic because it is the QANTAS main hub and is probably prepared to make adjustments. If anyone knows anything about A380 arrangments and Sydney Airport, please inform me!!!

User currently offlineAussie747 From Australia, joined Aug 2003, 1164 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4243 times:

This has been discussed in other threads



User currently offlineN754pr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4116 times:

Well, Hong Kong, Shanghai and Guangzhou will be fine as they are all new  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

User currently offlineFLYSSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7462 posts, RR: 57
Reply 7, posted (11 years 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3957 times:

What do you mean by "ready" ? Terminal ? jetways ? Taxiways ?

Concerning CDG, runways & taxiways have already been enlarged. The new terminal 2E has already 2 parking stand especially designed for the A380 where jetways can be positioned on both decks.

The new extension of Terminal 2E, called Satellite S3, is under construction and will be designed to receive additional A380's parking stand. It is scheduled to enter service in 2006, with the A380 for AF

User currently offlineJcded From Switzerland, joined Jan 2004, 213 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (11 years 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3800 times:

The new Terminal E (Midfield Dock) at Zurich's "Unique" airport (no idea how they came up with that name) was designed to accomodate A380s at the 4 corners of the terminal. The thing is I don't see who would want to fly a 380 in to ZRH, almost half the airport is closed to traffic due to over capacity.

You breathe to do good and have fun.
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8092 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (11 years 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3735 times:

At SFO, the new International Terminal (Concourses A and G) are ready to handle the A380-800, thanks to gates at the end of both concourses that have 80 x 80 meter spacing and jet bridges that took into account the size of what was then called the Airbus A3XX.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy The reason is simple: when the new International Terminal was being designed and built one of the important considerations was accommodation of future larger airliners, and given that by 1997 the A3XX had pretty much settled into its current A380 configuration the architects of Concourses A and G were able to include the 80 x 80 meter gates. Having seen those gate areas (pre 9/11/2001), they could probably upgrade easily to accommodate dual-level jet bridges.

Believe me, SFO will get a surprisingly amount of A380 service. Singapore Airlines' SQ 001/002 flights (the most lucrative flights on SQ's route system) could right now use the A388, Lufthansa could use the A380 on the LH 454/455 flights (it's nearly impossible to get tickets on this flight even with Lufthansa using the 747-400), and Virgin Atlantic could fly the A380 on the VS 19/20 route (a VERY lucrative route for Virgin Atlantic--hence the reason why it was among the first routes to roll out Upper Class Suite premium class seating).

User currently offlineHlywdCatft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5321 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (11 years 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3724 times:

DTW Midfield terminal in a couple international arrivals gates is supposed to be able to handle it so I am told by Northwest personnel. Several international gates have double jetways that can raise to different levels and it is definitely wide enough. Although, I do not know who will be flying an A380 into DTW anytime soon.

User currently offlineAirbusfanYYZ From Canada, joined Oct 2002, 1438 posts, RR: 24
Reply 11, posted (11 years 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3596 times:

The Greater Toronto Airport Authority is claiming that the International Pier in the new Terminal 1 at YYZ will have gates that can accomodate the a380. But again we'll hafta see who actually brings the big bird into Toronto.


t.dot photography
User currently offlineFuffla From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 401 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (11 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3473 times:

What I mean by airports being ready is everything, upgrading terminals to withstand the giant leap in passenger arrivals and departures, strengthening or widening or lengthing taxiways and runways. Making room at gates for the longer and wider plane!! Bacically every category!

User currently offlineAdria From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (11 years 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3437 times:

Taxiways and runways don't need to be upgraded. Well all in all it is not that big deal if you look at the capacity increase of only 35% compared to the 744. When the 747 came out the increase was more then 50% compared to the 707. So airports will not have huge problems to accommodate the A380

User currently offlineCVGpilot From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 588 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (11 years 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3399 times:

Who cares "AUSSIE747", anyways when is the first A380 going to be finished, and when will test flight start anyone know, thanks?

Globally Yours
User currently offlineAdria From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (11 years 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3382 times:

First flight is expected to be in one year from now.

User currently offlineCmckeithen From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 617 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (11 years 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3350 times:

Wake up guys. Any new aircraft MUST be designed to park at the CURRENT gates at all major airports. Which means that our current gates, can accomodate the A380

User currently offlineAirkiwi From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 30 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (11 years 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3222 times:

I think my local airport GNV may not be ready to accomodate the A380...  Yeah sure

still waiting for that first boeing aircraft.

User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 20
Reply 18, posted (11 years 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3206 times:

upgrading terminals to withstand the giant leap in passenger arrivals and departures

The "leap" won't be so "giant" with the possible exception of Asian airports. The first A380s will have a capacity of 555 passengers, which is only about +/- 150 than the 744. True, it will take longer to board and deplane, but I don't think that type of a passenger jump will make the burden on terminals much more significant. Customs halls may need to open an additional clearance line, and some baggage handling may need to become more efficient, but in terms of major renovations, few (if any) will be necessary.

"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
FI - Airports Getting Ready For A380 posted Tue Apr 20 2004 20:31:29 by Scbriml
Which Airports Are Ready For A380? posted Sat Jan 17 2004 03:42:53 by PVD757
Ontario Airport Gets Ready For A380 Ops posted Thu Mar 16 2006 16:03:39 by Mptpa
LAX To Be Ready For A380 In 2007 posted Wed Feb 1 2006 20:01:43 by Laxintl
Changi Airport Ready For A380 posted Tue Aug 16 2005 09:17:17 by Sq212
DFW's New Intl Terminal D Ready For A380 posted Mon Jul 25 2005 00:49:26 by AAgent
Airport Operator: "Lax Ready For A380 By 2006" posted Tue May 18 2004 16:06:36 by Teahan
New York JFK International Will Be Ready For A380! posted Wed Mar 24 2004 02:31:52 by AvObserver
U.S. Airports Not Ready For Airbus A380, Says Luft posted Tue Mar 9 2004 18:53:04 by AirportPlan
A380 04 Ready For Test In AUH posted Thu Jul 20 2006 18:09:07 by JBOND