Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Northwest Flight 17 Diversion  
User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3931 times:

Saw that a couple days ago, NWA17 (a B747-400) from New York to Tokyo diverted to Detroit due to "security reasons". Anyone have any more info?

24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRedtailmsp From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 208 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3650 times:

It was due to a disruptive passenger. Flt was about an hour north of DTW when this occured. Pax was a Chinese national who was becoming a real problem, so decision made to divert to DTW, have the authorities deal with him and continue flight to NRT. Dumped 130k of fuel, broke almost a full load of pax onward connections from NRT in the process. Very, very expensive for the airline, but little other choice. Continuing in these circumstances is not really an option, especially with another 9-10 hours or so ahead.

User currently offlineTriStarEnvy From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2265 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3602 times:

In the end, does the disruptive pax get billed for all the trouble? Obviously, at first, the airline gets stuck w/the bill, but what happens next?



[Edited 2004-02-17 16:33:54]


If you don't stand for SOMETHING, you'll fall for ANYTHING.
User currently offlineJblake1 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 292 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3531 times:

What are NWA's INTL non-stops from NYC?

User currently offlineAZO From United States of America, joined Jun 2002, 767 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3493 times:

I believe just AMS and NRT? Hub traffic only.


Kalamazoozoozoozoozoozoozoo
User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3002 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3371 times:

Yes, they operate JFK-NRT daily, and sometimes JFK-AMS seasonally. The latter is constantly changing, though, and as of now it's all KLM.


Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineAA777-200 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 323 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3293 times:

LOL! You know the funny part about this is???! He came down to TOL later that day and tried to buy a ticket on us for a flight to ORD! We had to deny him and the cops had to come haul his butt off the airport property! It was pretty interesting.

Brad


User currently offlineKaiGywer From United States of America, joined exactly 11 years ago today! , 12257 posts, RR: 35
Reply 7, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3171 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

AA777-200, how did you know this was the guy that brought down a NW plane? Is there a "disruptive pax database" ?  Big grin


“Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, an
User currently offlineAA777-200 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 323 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3073 times:

We got a call from the police saying it was him and that we were to not allow him on the plane. I guess he was very disruptive and also we had talked to NW up in DTW about him. Usually when stuff like this happens the airlines/airports look out for each other. And considering DTW/TOL is only about 60 miles apart we got alot of people driving back and fourth between airports. When I work tonight i'll ask the agent that actually dealt with him and see what she has to say.
Brad


User currently offlineContrails From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 1834 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2964 times:

Too bad the moron couldn't be fined for the cost of the of fuel. Maybe that would make him a bit less distruptive the next time.

Under the circumstances, I don't know what else NW could have done. A good decision on the Captain's part, I'm sure.



Flying Colors Forever!
User currently offlineNWAFA From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1893 posts, RR: 15
Reply 10, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2862 times:

Glad the FLIGHT ATTENDANTS made the decision to dump that guest off!


THANK YOU FOR FLYING NORTHWEST AIRLINES, WE TRULY APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS!
User currently offlineXFSUgimpLB41X From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 4213 posts, RR: 37
Reply 11, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2663 times:

Flight Attendants? I was in the jumpseat. It was a great CRM effort that entire situation. All crewmembers worked together very well. The FA's were immediately wanting to divert, not thinking of the amount of fuel that would be required to dump (we had to dump over 140,000 pounds). The captain (my dad) had the final say in the situation. We determined that we couldnt tell how the passenger would act if he was strapped in a seat all the way to ANC, and MSP was snowy, so DTW was the final decision. The other NF captain and FO, myself and one of the FA's put him into a seat (with minimal force) as we were on approach.


Chicks dig winglets.
User currently offlineXFSUgimpLB41X From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 4213 posts, RR: 37
Reply 12, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2637 times:

By the way..he was obviously mentally disturbed...all of what he said was nothing but jibberish. Some type of schizophrenia maybe?


Chicks dig winglets.
User currently offlineAviatorTJ From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1838 posts, RR: 7
Reply 13, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2469 times:

What day was this on?

User currently offlineXFSUgimpLB41X From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 4213 posts, RR: 37
Reply 14, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 2351 times:

The 8th if i remember correctly...


Chicks dig winglets.
User currently offlineUAL747DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2392 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2218 times:

If NW really wanted to take the time to sue this guy they could. The problem with that is it costs a lot of money to have a lawyer in court for a couple of days then all you can do is hope that he pays and try to garnish his wages if you can find him.....


/// UNITED AIRLINES
User currently offlineUAL747DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2392 posts, RR: 11
Reply 16, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2215 times:

XFSUgimpLB41X
How were you able to ride in the jump seat? From what I know that is not allowed anymore in the USA Please give me some info on that



/// UNITED AIRLINES
User currently offlineNWAA330 From United States of America, joined Jun 2003, 213 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2146 times:

UAL747DEN,

In his post XFSUgimpLB41X says that the captain was his father. "The captain (my dad) had the final say in the situation." Which I think explains his jump seat ride.

NWAA330



To Fly is to Live.
User currently offlineAAJAXFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2076 times:

Which I think explains his jump seat ride.

His profile says he is a CRJ pilot... I assume for Pinnacle... which probably gives him the ability.


User currently offlineTjwgrr From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2462 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1923 times:

WOW! 140K fuel = apx. 20,500 gallons @ $2.00 plus per gallon = apx. $41,000+ in lost fuel alone...... Not to mention costs involved re-booking pax on other flights due to missed cxns.


Direct KNOBS, maintain 2700' until established on the localizer, cleared ILS runway 26 left approach.
User currently offlineXFSUgimpLB41X From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 4213 posts, RR: 37
Reply 20, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1779 times:

I had the jumpseat because I fly for 9E, not because my papa bear was the captain.

We figured that it costed the airline at least a couple million dollars with hotels, rebooks, landing fees, and all the other stuff that goes along with delaying 370 something people.

Kind of ironic- it was my dad's retirement trip and his first time ever having to divert after 32 years flying in the airlines. Congrats to him for a great career!  Smile



Chicks dig winglets.
User currently offlinePilot727aa From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 136 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1734 times:

NWAFA, you are so damn bitter about everything.
This post and many others.. Get over it.


User currently offlineVSLover From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 1897 posts, RR: 22
Reply 22, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1688 times:

Say, can someone tell me WHY the fuel had to be dumped?

New to the specifics of certain things....

thanks!

-j


User currently offlineXFSUgimpLB41X From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 4213 posts, RR: 37
Reply 23, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1628 times:

The reason you have to fuel dump is because of the huge difference between maximum takeoff weight and maximum landing weight. The 747-400 has a maximum takeoff weight of 870,000 pounds...and a maximum landing weight of 630,000 pounds. We weighed about 817 that day on takeoff...and had flown for a little while, so 140,000 pounds of fuel was the calculated amount need to dump to get us close enough to maximum landing weight. Typical landing fuel is around 30-40,000 pounds.


Chicks dig winglets.
User currently offlineTjwgrr From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2462 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1605 times:

"Say, can someone tell me WHY the fuel had to be dumped?

New to the specifics of certain things....

thanks!"


-----------------------------

Simply put to shed weight. Planes with a combination of heavy fuel loads, cargo loads, and pax loads can't land at the weights they take-off with without risk of serious structural damage to the aircraft.

[Edited 2004-02-18 21:21:09]


Direct KNOBS, maintain 2700' until established on the localizer, cleared ILS runway 26 left approach.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BIO-ORD Flight MPD905 Diversion? posted Thu Oct 19 2006 10:08:47 by EHHO
Northwest Flight Attendants Conduct Chaos Activit posted Thu Aug 3 2006 21:17:52 by TVNWZ
Northwest Flight Attendant Dispute Updates posted Thu Aug 3 2006 20:00:18 by KarlB737
Northwest Flight Attendants May Change Unions posted Mon Sep 26 2005 21:04:13 by KarlB737
Northwest Flight Attendants & Pilots May Walk posted Sun Aug 14 2005 23:41:58 by KarlB737
AA Flight 135 Diversion posted Sat Sep 25 2004 02:41:29 by AAplatnumflier
Supersize Your Northwest Flight! posted Thu Jul 1 2004 19:45:17 by Rjpieces
Swiss Air Lines Flight 17 For May 11 posted Wed May 12 2004 03:07:17 by Alitalia777
SFO To Tokyo, Northwest Flight 27. Equip? posted Fri Nov 8 2002 02:48:25 by VonRichtofen
Northwest Flight Evacuated Due To Pax 911 Fear! posted Tue Nov 20 2001 12:23:41 by 9V-SPK