Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A340-300E Vs -300 Enhanced  
User currently onlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17351 posts, RR: 46
Posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 5988 times:

What's the difference between the A340-300E and the A340-300 Enhanced? And what about the -300X? I know what enhancements are involved in "Enhanced" but I don't know what the 300E and 300X involve.


E pur si muove -Galileo
22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTsentsan From Singapore, joined Jan 2002, 2016 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 5941 times:

I had the impression that all the designations mean the same thing?...



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 5846 times:

Singapore Airlines while they still had their A340-313Xs named theirs the A340-300E with the E standing for Enhanced. But these -313X are just higher MTOW versions delivered and upgradable to operators of -311 etc.

But now the A340-300 Enhanced features new interior, minor upgrades here and there and a 'new' powerplant.

Someone may be able to explain better than myself and correct me if I am wrong.


User currently offlineAirxLiban From Lebanon, joined Oct 2003, 4506 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5778 times:

they also have more powerful GE-only engines ASAIK.


PARIS, FRANCE...THE BEIRUT OF EUROPE.
User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5725 times:

No AirxLiban

All A340s are powered by CFM engines with different ratings and maybe slightly updated ones. I don't know the models etc someone else can help with this.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5708 times:

The 340-200 and -300 all variants are only powered by CFM International CFM56-5C engines.

The A340-313X, which was previously referred to by SQ as the 343E, are higher-gross-weight frames with a a centerline fuel tank, strengthened wing, and the tail enhancements from the A330-200.


The A340-314, A340-314X, or whatever, the new A340-300 Enhanced, are powered by the new CFM56-5C/P. They include a completely new and updated avionics suite with LCD displays, a new FBW system with additional FBW controls for the rudder and some other basic improvements from the A340-500/600 family.

N


User currently offlineMD-11 forever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5665 times:

For your information, the main difference between the CFM56-5C and the new -5C/P is not the thrust or power but the time on wing and therefore reduced maintenance costs.......

Cheers, Thomas


User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5649 times:

MD-11,

But I thought these -5C/P are also more environmentally friendly with lower emission and this helps LX save a lot of pollution fees to airport authority at ZRH?

It is also slightly more efficient than the earlier -5C during cruising phase.


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5631 times:

All A340s are powered by CFM engines

Actually, the -500/600 are powered by Trent500s


__________________
Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre c'est impossible sans Concorde!
~ConcordeBoy


User currently onlineScorpio From Belgium, joined Oct 2001, 5016 posts, RR: 44
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 5549 times:

Airbus Lover,

But I thought these -5C/P are also more environmentally friendly with lower emission and this helps LX save a lot of pollution fees to airport authority at ZRH?

Actually, the LX A340s are not A340-300 Enhanced, they are the 'ordinary' A340-313X. SA will be the first to get the -314X.


User currently offlineBlooBirdie From Lesotho, joined Sep 2003, 256 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 5522 times:

Scorpio said:
SA will be the first to get the -314X.

And here it is:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © French Frogs AirSlides



User currently offlineAirxLiban From Lebanon, joined Oct 2003, 4506 posts, RR: 53
Reply 11, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 5440 times:

i was referring to the A340-300E version...so it is only available with CFMs?


PARIS, FRANCE...THE BEIRUT OF EUROPE.
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 5417 times:

yes

__________________
Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre c'est impossible sans Concorde!
~ConcordeBoy


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 13, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5378 times:

The LX A340s are the "enhanced" minus the -5C/P.

They are, therefore, still A340-313X, but have the other new features I mentioned.

Qantas was the first to receive an Enhanced A330-200, and Northwest the first to receive an Enhanced A330-300.

N


User currently offlineDynkrisolo From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1860 posts, RR: 7
Reply 14, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5334 times:


The LX A340s are the "enhanced" minus the -5C/P.


That's incorrect. All of LX's 343s before SAA's first 343 delivery have the -5C/P engines, but without the cockpit, interior, and other upgrades associated with the Enhanced model. LX will receive some 343 Enhanced.

I found a related CFM press release article http://www.cfm56/news/press/cfm02-33.htm.

Also, are you guys inventing the designation for the 343Enhanced? The -311, -312, -313 are three 340 models with three different engine thrusts. The -5C/P will have the same thrust as the -5C. So, I am not sure if the 343Enhanced will be designated as -314. In the CFM press release, it said all -5C engines could be upgraded to -5C/P. Then I suspect there is no such thing as -314. If that's not the case, then all of LX's 343s will be -314, but some of them will not be the Enhanced model. Confusing, isn't it?  Wow!

[Edited 2004-02-13 22:43:57]

User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 15, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5309 times:

LX's 343s before SAA's first 343 delivery have the -5C/P engines, but without the cockpit, interior, and other upgrades associated with the Enhanced model. LX will receive some 343 Enhanced.

Interesting. I was under the impression it was the other way around, but I'm sure you're quite right.

Thrust rating isn't necessarily the deciding factor for the variant number, its engine model. I would assume if you upgraded a -5C4 to a -5C/P, the last digit would change.

I'm fairly sure it changes even on the 320 series models depending on the number of annular combustors installed, ie a -5B4, -5B4/P, and -5B4/2P. It definitely changes between two different engines of the same thrust for the 319 and 320, like -5A vs. -5B and whatnot.

Lastly, I heard -314, but not from someone at Airbus or CFM, so what I heard could be quite wrong.

N


User currently offlineDynkrisolo From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1860 posts, RR: 7
Reply 16, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5273 times:


Interesting. I was under the impression it was the other way around


Here's another press release from CFMI:

http://www.cfm56.com/news/press/cfm03-11.htm


User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 17, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 5135 times:

Sorry typo up there i meant A342/3s were only available in CFM powerplants.

As for LX's, I heard they will subsequently be upgraded. I think they have all the Enhanced upgrades minus powerplant as it is not yet certified or some sort? Not sure on this.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 18, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 5087 times:

Dynkrisolo seems to be quite right, its the other way around.

The frames have no enhancements, just the engines.

N


User currently offlineDanialanwar From Switzerland, joined Mar 2001, 421 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 4924 times:

I vaguely recall that it was once said that the first few A343s for LX will not be enhanced(?)/advanced(?) but that they will be upgraded such that they will form a uniform fleet after some time. That was a long time ago though and all may have changed.

Anyway, with Airbus, the last two digits in the plane name (as in A340-313X) refer to the engine, and not the inital customer as Boeing does.



Best Business Class: Royal Brunei. Best Economy: Singapore Airlines. First: please send money first!
User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 851 posts, RR: 2
Reply 20, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4854 times:

I´m curius why airbus was flying with a 340-3?? with Xtra large winglets at Toulouse last fall??
Hmmmmm....
 Big thumbs up
Michael//SE



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineJoule From Malaysia, joined Dec 2003, 159 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4687 times:

I´m curius why airbus was flying with a 340-3?? with Xtra large winglets at Toulouse last fall??

They were flight-testing new winglets for future aircraft programs, including update on the A320 family. It's similar to the winglets tested earlier on the A340 which was part of the AWIATOR (aircraft wing with advanced technology operation) research program.


User currently offlineOsteogenesis From Germany, joined May 2003, 647 posts, RR: 2
Reply 22, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4607 times:

http://fmr.ilr.tu-berlin.de/Forschung/awiator_e.htm

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A340-200 Vs -300 Range Question posted Fri May 3 2002 23:46:51 by CF-CPI
A340-300E Vs. A340-500/600? posted Mon Jan 29 2001 12:13:27 by VH-BZF
A340-300 Enhanced, Customers? posted Fri Apr 9 2004 02:51:32 by A388
CFM56-5C4 Powered A340-300 Enhanced posted Thu Mar 8 2001 23:06:29 by TEDSKI
A340-200 Vs. A340-300 posted Tue Jun 20 2000 12:18:42 by Ben88
A340-600/777-300 Gates At LAX? posted Tue Apr 25 2006 00:17:33 by FLY777UAL
Airbus A340-200 Or 300? posted Wed Oct 19 2005 06:40:16 by Captaink
A340-300E Range Question posted Fri Jun 10 2005 21:30:20 by FLY777UAL
A340-500 Vs. 777-200LR, SIN-LAX posted Fri Dec 10 2004 07:00:59 by Clickhappy
First Choice Launch B767-300 Enhanced Conversion posted Wed Apr 7 2004 20:11:26 by Crosswind