Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Restart Of DC-10 Programs?  
User currently offlineBraathens From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3007 times:

Will they ever restart the DC-10-Series Programs?

ilove that AC and hate that many airlines are replacing it

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFLYtoEGCC From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 947 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2949 times:

You mean actually start building DC-10s and/or MD-11s again? I doubt it - there are aircraft of a similar size that can do the same job much more efficiently, (except, perhaps, in the case of the MD-11F) and the cost of restarting the line would probably be quite high.


Come fly with me, let's fly, let's fly away...
User currently offlineStevenUhl777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2838 times:

No, sadly. I also love the DC-10, but airlines seem to prefer either the twinjet concept for short and medium haul routes (and the ER versions for the long haul) or the 4-engine 747 or A340/A380.

I could be wrong, but I doubt we'll see a three-engine a/c anytime soon.


User currently offlineDodgeCharger From United States of America, joined Jun 2003, 210 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2510 times:

The tooling for these aircraft has almost certainly been destroyed.

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2446 times:

Lufty tried to hard to get Boeing to reopen the M11F line... but didnt succeed.

M11SFs will continue to do their job well for years to come; and eventually be succeeded by 772LRFs, or so it's initially planned


User currently offlineHAL From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2565 posts, RR: 53
Reply 5, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2088 times:

If they were to restart the DC-10 line, they'd have to do some major re-engineering because the systems and such are 30+ years old as designed. They'd probably start with the engines, and since they are much more efficient today than the original GE CF-6 they started with, they could hang two larger engines on it and do away with the third engine, saving a lot of fuel and maintenance cost. Then the wing would have to be redesigned because it just wasn't as efficient as the wings used today. Finally add new electronics for the cockpit, do away with the Flight Engineer's station, add new IFE, more efficient air conditioning units and.....

wait a minute...

we just designed a 767/777/A330 clone!

OK, sorry for pulling your leg just a little. The truth is, just as some of the previous posters said, the DC-10 was great for its time, but now there are simply newer and better airplanes for the offering. Airlines are businesses and don't get very sentimental about old aluminum (OK, maybe the Concorde, but that's it). They want what will cost them the least for getting the most people where they want to go.

HAL



One smooth landing is skill. Two in a row is luck. Three in a row and someone is lying.
User currently offlineEric From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 2023 times:

i remember watching a program about airline accidents and come to think of it they specifically critized the MD-11's b/c of the third engine. it had to do with the fact that the tail-fin is made of composites and are more prone to damage during a lightning storm. this may be me remembering badly, but i do believe the conclusion of the show was that it the danger of damage was the reason why that specific enigine/tail was taken out of production,

eric


User currently offlineLowsonboy From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2001, 275 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1865 times:

Eric

That sounds very odd.... almost all aircraft have composite tailfin nowadays, not just the M11. Are you maybe getting confused with the criticism the M11 has come under from some quarters for the small size of its tailfin, which can lead to a loss of control on some approaches?


User currently offlineIluv727s From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 115 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1818 times:

What is the problem with the MD-11F? It was mentioned in near the top of this post.


A lack of planning on your behalf does not create an emergency on my behalf.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
HA Completes Phase-out Of DC-10 Fleet posted Sat Mar 1 2003 05:41:32 by HA_DC9
Incredible Photo Of DC-10's Last Moments posted Fri Mar 22 2002 19:17:34 by SAA747
Colored Lights On Top Of DC-10 Cabin posted Sat Jan 26 2002 01:36:10 by ILS
Sound Of DC-10 Engines posted Tue Jul 17 2001 00:36:43 by Mike_mit
Has Your Opinion Of DC-10 Changed? posted Mon Sep 4 2000 16:22:40 by EWRSpotter
Your Opnions Of DC-10/MD-11 Aircraft posted Sun Aug 6 2000 08:13:29 by VirginA340
No.2 Engine Of DC-10 posted Fri Sep 17 1999 02:58:00 by B777
What Was The N Number Of The CO DC-10? posted Sat Nov 4 2006 18:46:49 by AirTran737
Feds Bar Use Of Firefighting DC-10 posted Fri Oct 13 2006 01:36:41 by Echster
Need Help Identifying Mystery DC-10 Out Of McGuire posted Sat Aug 26 2006 08:47:03 by PWM2TXLHopper