Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LH Using Thomas Cook 763's?  
User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4980 posts, RR: 51
Posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1894 times:

Just a word here.

LH will be using Thomas Cook 763's for YULMUC this summer... 36C/209Y is the config.

any reason?

Mark

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSailorOrion From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 2058 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days ago) and read 1763 times:

2 words:

aircraft shortage.

SailorOrion


User currently offlineAirsicknessbag From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 4723 posts, RR: 33
Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1681 times:

Another three words: low yield route.

Daniel Smile


User currently offlineVfw614 From Germany, joined Dec 2001, 4003 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 months 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 1610 times:

I will also be used on the new Munich-Delhi route (thrice weekly). My understanding is that LH now only uses one Lauda/TCA Boeing 767-300 and this one will be replaced by an Airbus A340-300 sometime in 2004.

User currently offlineAviationman From Canada, joined Dec 1999, 634 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1506 times:

Airsicknessbag, how do you justify your comment? Or is is it just a free affirmation from your part? Can you explain? Low yield? We are curious.

User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32789 posts, RR: 72
Reply 5, posted (10 years 7 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1450 times:

Airsicknessbag, how do you justify your comment? Or is is it just a free affirmation from your part? Can you explain? Low yield? We are curious.


The 767-300ER is in a high-density, 2-class configuration. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the 763ERs are, indeed, meant to be on lower-yielding services. They have perviously served ATL-FRA and the now discontinued PHX-FRA. Until recently, they were flying MIA-MUC (which is now an A340-300).



a.
User currently offlineAirsicknessbag From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 4723 posts, RR: 33
Reply 6, posted (10 years 7 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1406 times:


Additionally to what MAH4546 correctly said, LH stated that they had no intention to do away with F class. But they´d deploy those planes in two class layouts to low yield routes on which the occupants of F seats were mostly upgrades.

Daniel Smile


User currently offlineAviationman From Canada, joined Dec 1999, 634 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 7 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1332 times:

"It does not take a genius to figure out...."

So glad to know that you are a genius....and I am not.

Would be great if people instead of posting "Three words" post would simply include some more info. Does not take a genius to figure this one out.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LH To MIA, Thomas Cook? posted Fri Nov 21 2003 09:36:45 by Jaumett
Thomas Cook Airlines At Luton This Summer? posted Sat Jan 3 2009 13:37:52 by Gilesdavies
Thomas Cook Security Risk posted Mon Nov 24 2008 05:11:22 by Britannia191A
Tuifly & Thomas Cook Scandinavia At FLL posted Tue Nov 11 2008 23:08:26 by Njdevilsin03
Thomas Cook Launch New X-Rated IFE Today! posted Mon Nov 3 2008 12:54:37 by Cwldude
Thomas Cook To Be Sold? posted Fri Sep 26 2008 10:12:45 by Beaucaire
Why Does Thomas Cook Have 3 Different Websites? posted Fri Sep 19 2008 04:05:30 by 8herveg
Thomas Cook 767 - 8 Across In Coach?! posted Wed Sep 17 2008 10:35:38 by SSTsomeday
Thomas Cook A330 G-OJMB Titles posted Sun Aug 17 2008 11:07:48 by N80NA
Is Condor Thomas Cook And Vice Versa? posted Thu May 22 2008 17:38:21 by FalconBird