BCAInfoSys From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (9 years 3 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1869 times:
I was just thinking that BA is the only airline that currently offers service from LHR - SEA. (Though UA has route, they're not using it.) So I was just thinking, what are the chances of seeing VS A340s in SEA?
Venezuela747 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1407 posts, RR: 5 Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1788 times:
What about VS flying to Denver? I know BA already serves this route from LGW but is there any chance?
MAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 31118 posts, RR: 74 Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1709 times:
Virgin's market profile is to fly to tourist destinations that attract a good amount of British tourists. Now, for the most part, the higher-yieldings ones are flown with low-density aircraft out of Heathrow and the lower yielding ones are served with high-density aircraft out of Gatwick. Denver, Seattle, Houston, and Dallas do not fit this profile. They are not "hot spots" for British tourists. Neither is Chicago, which is one reason Virgin was unable to make the Chicago market work despite how huge it is.
Coronado990 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1590 posts, RR: 2 Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1628 times:
Virgin's market profile is to fly to tourist destinations that attract a good amount of British tourists.
Then I would think SAN would be on that list if BA does not return.
Sponsor Message: 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 31118 posts, 
From Switzerland, joined Dec 2003, 413 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
Printer friendly format 
