Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
More Crew = Better Service?  
User currently offlineTBCITDG From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 921 posts, RR: 3
Posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1755 times:

I am wondering wether having more flight attendants throughout the aircraft means better service?
Especially in the Economy section of larger aircrafts.
I am not too sure how many crew each airline has for a 744 for example, but if there are mnore crew, does it mean that people will get a more individual service as opposed to a rushed one.
I heard that some Asian carriers have more crew on their 744's and cabin crew have the time to hand out meals, obtain drink orders and chat with passengers. Especially since they know that they only need to do a few number of rows.
Having said this, is it therefore fair for management of other carriers to compare what their crew do on board with their Asian counterparts?


11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAndz From South Africa, joined Feb 2004, 8453 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1732 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

SAA carry the following cabin crew:

737-200: 4
737-800: 5
A340-200: 11
A340-600: 14
A330: 11
747-200: 12
747-300: 14
747-400: 14




After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says WTF...
User currently offlineSevenair From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 1728 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1703 times:

I do not thinik it is down to the number of staff, more so the attitudes of staff; for xample, my last UA transatlantic flight ha a lot of crew, but they paced up the aisles like security guard, then on the internal flight, the A320 had only 3 crew, and the servicec was nice, warm and friendly

User currently offlineHAL From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2561 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1692 times:

At Hawaiian the legal minimum number of flight attendants on the 767-300 is six, but contractually they staff it at eight. The F/A's (and maybe HALFA can back me up on this) say it helps ease the pressure of serving so many people by having the extra crew on board and makes the service that much better. In a service driven industry like this, that small difference can result in more repeat customers and better income for the airline. Apparently Hawaiian feels that it is worth the extra cost.

HAL



One smooth landing is skill. Two in a row is luck. Three in a row and someone is lying.
User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19227 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1652 times:

More crew might mean a better service, in that the passengers might receive their food, drink and generally receive the attention of the cabin crew more quickly. But even this depends upon the cabin crew being sufficiently motivated. If you had a team of 2 who were extremely motivated and thus productive, verses three who were hardly motivated at all and consequently pretty unproductive, I bet the former would quite easily beat the latter. Therefore, it’s not necessarily the number of cabin crew, but rather whether they’re highly motivated which is the most important consideration in delivering quality, admirable, memorable, individual and professional customer service – MOTIVATION. (I am aware of the requirements to have a certain number of cabin crew according to the total capacity (i.e. empty seats) of the aircraft. In the UK, it's 1 per every 50 seats.)


"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineSammyhostie From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1636 times:

The main role of a crew member is safety, obviously serving and customer service is essential, but we are primairily there for your safety and have been thoroughly trained to provide that.

User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19227 posts, RR: 52
Reply 6, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1628 times:

Oh yeah, the cabin crew's main priority (just like any airline's) is safety. No doubt about that.  Smile


"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineTBCITDG From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 921 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1526 times:

Sammyhostie: There should be a balance. You cannot hire bad crew simply because they are safety orriantated.

I find some airlines, the crew run around like headless chickens. They have no time to stop, breathe and chat to you. It is a matter of 'throwing out those trays' and by the time they end up 73rd passengers, people at the fron are already wondering when they will get more drinks and their trays taken!

I think (if I am not mistaken) Thai airways for example, their crew do only on cart (36 pax) and that is it. Of course they will have time to chat or to see if they can do anything else for you!


User currently offlineEzycrew From Spain, joined Oct 2001, 460 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1497 times:

At LX we have reduced our longhaul crew complement to the minimum... now the whole of Y-cl (180 pax) is only served by 3 f/a's...2 serving the cabin, and the 3rd running back and forth between them and the galley... It's really exhausting, and needless to say we don't have a minute for a chat, even on a 12 hours flight.

User currently offlineTBCITDG From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 921 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1441 times:

That is really bad Ezycrew!!!
I can on ly imagine with time restraints etc, you all must finished worst for ware!!


User currently offlineAndz From South Africa, joined Feb 2004, 8453 posts, RR: 10
Reply 10, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1418 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Ezycrew, what type do you fly? And isn't the minimum crew requirement determined by the number of exits on the aircraft?




After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says WTF...
User currently offlineAmirs From Israel, joined Dec 2003, 1333 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1398 times:

As far as i know, minimum for emergency is determined by the number of seats (1:50) and the number of crew members needed to open primary doors. Though most airlines have "service" minimum. Lets take an EL AL 3 class configurated 744, and a 2 class 757-200 as examples.

752 - An EL AL 752 carries just under 200 pax and has 6 primary doors (or three pairs 1L-R, 2L-R, 4L-R). Using the 1:50 key, then 4 crew is enough. Since there are 6 doors which 3 crew member can easily open (one for every pair of doors), then the minimum for emergency is 4. EL AL adds two more crew members, thus 6 is the minimum crew for service on EL AL flights.

744 - An EL AL 744 carries about 410 seats and has 12 primary doors (including upperdeck 1-6/L-R). If the number of crew was only determinded by the number of seats, then 9 would be enough (using the key of 1:50). As already mentioned a 774 has 12 primary doors (or six pairs) but since one f/a would have difficulty operating both pairs because of the distance between each pairs then in ultra wide bodies (777, 742, 744) each door needs one crew member. Thus 12 is FAA/CAA minimum for a 744. EL AL adds 6 more F/A to a 3 class configurated 744, making the EL AL minimum 18. (2 Pursers, 2 First, 6 Business, 8 Economy).

Back to the question of the thread. I find 18 crew members enough for a loaded 744. I dont think there needs to be more than 18 on a 744. Anymore will not be helpful for the crew. There are a specific number of trolleys that can fit in a plane and a specific number of aisles and zones. In econmy if you add more than 2 f/a to a zone (there are 3 C, D and E) and one f/a to each of two galleys then you will just be adding caos. On flights that i flew, the only time extra f/a were needed were when there was an excessive number of special meals to hand out. In those cases crew from the forward (first and business) usually come to help out. I really feel though that more crew then need is not helpful. Sometimes service that is too fast is not so good for the pax either.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CO To Add More MSY-EWR Service posted Tue Feb 20 2007 04:01:48 by MSYtristar
FWA Gets More AA Eagle Service To ORD And DFW posted Tue Feb 13 2007 00:12:51 by FWAERJ
Why IB Not Better Service? posted Fri Feb 2 2007 22:23:17 by RootsAir
Even More ATL-Asia Service By KE? posted Thu Oct 12 2006 15:38:11 by WorldTraveler
AirTran Adds More New Orleans Service posted Sun Jul 9 2006 03:41:59 by MSYtristar
AirTran Resumes More Gulf Coast Service posted Fri Jul 7 2006 03:32:25 by MSYtristar
More LAX-Mexico Service posted Fri May 12 2006 02:50:52 by MD90fan
American Connection: More MSY-STL Service posted Sat Apr 29 2006 18:20:54 by MSYtristar
DL To Add More MSY-MCO Service posted Mon Jan 23 2006 00:58:48 by MSYtristar
Air France Adding More 777-300ER Service To Beirut posted Sun Sep 4 2005 23:39:04 by BA