Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ATA Employees Only Worth Y Class  
User currently offline717-200 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 601 posts, RR: 2
Posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 4193 times:

Quoted from ATA's press release regarding their new business class product.
Unlike most airlines, ATA employees will not have access to Business Class accommodations. Mikelsons noted, "This policy further demonstrates how ATA is an 'honestly different' airline."

If you are an ATA employee how does this make you feel, especially since this
was put into a press release to the public! I understand the customer focus,
but couldn't this policy have been released on an internal level only?



72S 733 734 735 73G 738 742 752 763 E190 M82 M83
45 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBoeing757/767 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 2282 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 4155 times:

I agree on that one -- nothing wrong with the policy, but it's not something to be released publicly. It's like saying, 'Don't worry, we won't let the riff-raff in.'


Free-thinking, left-leaning secularist
User currently offlineMidway2airtran From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 864 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 4088 times:

I must agree that this release is disrespectful to the employees!! When I read it for the first time, my jaw dropped at those quotes. I was angered that they would say that in a public release! I guess they have a PR department and I can not believe that anyone would let that go! Dam'n, I took offense to it and I'm not even an ATA employee. Nothing wrong with the policy itself, but to go public and say that your employees could be an inconvenience to its passengers sounds wrong to me! Any ATA employees out there to respond? Any word of reaction internally about the release? At least they are honestly different about their employees.

Cheers!!! Smile



"Life is short, but your delay in ATL is not."
User currently offlineFedExIndy From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 77 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 4074 times:

I used to be an ATA employee. About par for the course.

User currently offlineHpa318 From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 124 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 3950 times:

So this means that if youre flying standby on yur own airline and coach is full that theyll leave you behind even though their might be 10 open seats in first.
That sucks! sometimes being able to sit in first is the only way to get one flights these days, espacially florida.


User currently offlineTZSFO From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 202 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 3932 times:

That's not what the policy is......we won't leave empty seats....I would assume that we will upgrade paying passengers (kind of a familiarization thing).

Think about the average passengers image of first class.....it is something reserved for the very rich and airline employees....this dispells that notion and gives the passengers that "special" feeling....

I only look for the no non-rev policy to last about a year or so....then it will be lifted...


TZ



It takes nerves of steel to stay neurotic. — Herb Kelleher
User currently offlineAvt007 From Canada, joined Jul 2000, 2132 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 3916 times:

Don't forget they could be talking about crew deadheading, an issue that apparently some pax get excited about. If they are talking nonrev, then thats an internal issue. My own opinion is, load the cons in the back and upgrade the paying pax. BTW, I've spent 10 years as a con (no longer) and now I'm a paying pax, so I see it from both ways.

User currently offlineWmupilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 1473 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 3914 times:

Ok...how many of you have the facts? I'm guessing little to non of you. The company is working on a policy for future travel for employees in the business class. Up until 2 weeks ago we never had a business class and the only way was to fly in coach. Sure the announcement has made some employees mad but a majority aren't upset with the announcement. If this gets our brand recognition out and gets us the respect we deserve among the traveling public then i'm all for it. Not even the CEO can use the new business class. This shows that we truely love our passengers and want the to feel comfortable. So unless you work for ATA you have no right to gripe about the decision.


JetBlue - Bringing humanity back to air travel
User currently offlineATA767 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 419 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 3768 times:

Wmupilot
Weither you work for ATA or not, the announcment is disrespectful. We are all humans and can have a reaction to policies even if there are business reasons. Imagine trying to reaccomidate 12 paying customers at boarding time, what will that do for on-time performance? All to snub your employees? I know for one that ATA's crews are pissed about the whole issue.


User currently offlineMidway2airtran From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 864 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 3734 times:

"Ok...how many of you have the facts? I'm guessing little to non of you. The company is working on a policy for future travel for employees in the business class. Up until 2 weeks ago we never had a business class and the only way was to fly in coach. Sure the announcement has made some employees mad but a majority aren't upset with the announcement. If this gets our brand recognition out and gets us the respect we deserve among the traveling public then i'm all for it. Not even the CEO can use the new business class. This shows that we truely love our passengers and want the to feel comfortable. So unless you work for ATA you have no right to gripe about the decision."

Yea, its good that ATA is adding Business Class, especially following the success that LCC's AirTran and Spirit have already had with their Biz Class products. The problem is not the Non-Rev policy itself, that's fine, but the fact that it would be embarrassing for your own CEO to quote publicly (Keep it in the employee handbook, not public) that you and your fellow employees are an inconvenience in a Business Class cabin, damn! I feel offended and I am not even a ATA employee! As an Airline employee myself, I consider the comments in the release to be thoughtless and down right rude.



"Life is short, but your delay in ATL is not."
User currently offlineIfly2eat From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 8 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 3573 times:

Well, I do work for ATA so I can gripe and I do know ALL the facts so here goes my griping. The idea itself is not flawed. I want paying passengers (who pay my bills) to ride in comfort and come back to fly us again and again. That being said, to actually put that in a press release is absolutely the stupidest thing I have ever seen in a press release. Upgrade paying passengers but do not go out and say "employees will not be allowed to fly in business class." Do it quietly and on the few occasions that there are left over seats after upgrading passengers put a non-rev up there but do it all quietly. By the way, except for pilots and flight attendants (who are under union contracts) ATA employees have been on a wage freeze since 9-11 and now this comes down the line. Not really a good way to say thanks to the people who sacrificed during hard economic times. Also, I am quite sure that when our flights require an IO (international relief officer) he/ she will be in business class. That is a union issue but I assure you, crew rest seats aren't normally in coach. ATA is a great company to work for and in my opinion to fly on, but this press release was a gigantic "opps" by someone in our marketing department.


Fly the friendly skys and stay out of mine.
User currently offlineType-rated From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 3516 times:

... Not even the CEO can use the new business class.....

I'll believe that one when I see it!


User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12113 posts, RR: 49
Reply 12, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 3503 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I agree that it does send a negative message to all the hard working and dedicated employees of TZ!


You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineHNLFlyboy From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 321 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 3460 times:

Does anyone have any cabin views of the new business class on TZ?

User currently offlineAa757first From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3350 posts, RR: 8
Reply 14, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 3429 times:

I hear that sitting next to a non-rev is second only to a free seat. From what I understand, they never pull out pictures of their grandchildren and force you to look at them.  Smile

AAndrew


User currently offlineJjbiv From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1226 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3383 times:

My opinion is that the idea was a good one -- until someone in P.R. got a little too excited at proving how "Honestly Different" an airline we are and tossed it in the press release. At the least, employees should have been forewarned that this was coming and prepared to see it before the public noticed it in the release.

Ifly2eat, might want to check your facts again; the pay freeze has been lifted for several months now.

The good thing about working for ATA is that when a misstep does occur, the company is quick to acknowledge such once brought to their attention. Also, it is comforting to know that management doesn't seek to run the company with an iron fist and screw employees as if it was an intramural sport. Sure, as everywhere, not so good things happen here, but they are almost always driven by the best of intentions, even if sometimes lacking in foresight or even intelligence.

ATA is like Avis: "we try harder."

joe


User currently offlineJetBluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2988 posts, RR: 14
Reply 16, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3322 times:

I think that the policy is fine, but it shouldn't be put into a press release to the public. If I were an ATA crew member, then I'd be ticked. But I'm not, so I can't speak for them. I guess the ATA CEO has a different way of handling his staff than the JetBlue CEO - who actually respects his Crewmembers and only praises them.

JetBluefan1



Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
User currently offlineDeltaMIA From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 1672 posts, RR: 17
Reply 17, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3280 times:

I don't understand the policy, but I don't work for ATA.
The decision is appalling to me as an airline employee. There is no reason that employees shouldn't be given first or business class. Every airline requires business casual dress attire for employees to ride in a premium cabin (some even require it for coach). Employees traveling on leisure don't stamp their forehead with a scarlet letter or anything so how does John Q. Public know that the person sitting next to him is an employee or Mrs. Public in coach know that an employee is sitting in first when she was trying to get more than she paid for.
Airlines should do their best to care for their employees; without the employees there isn't an airline. At Delta they are adamant about the concept "A Happy employee is a Happy passenger".
Why shouldn't an employee or family be given business/first on a space available basis? I can't think of any reasons.



It's a big building with patients, but that's not important right now.
User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5482 posts, RR: 15
Reply 18, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3236 times:

What if the ATA Employee's spouse(who doesn't work for ATA) pays the airfare for first?

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6204 posts, RR: 12
Reply 19, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3164 times:

Back several years ago, nonrevs were not allowed in First Class on international flights on DL.


Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6204 posts, RR: 12
Reply 20, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3163 times:

It looks like the press release has been removed.


Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
User currently offlineMidway2airtran From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 864 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3122 times:

Yep, it appears that the press release was removed today from the website. Unfortunately, hundreds of thousands of people have probably seen it. I would hope that the PR/Marketing dept. or whoever let that go, takes responsibility for their mistake.


"Life is short, but your delay in ATL is not."
User currently offlineIfly2eat From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 8 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3071 times:

Hey Jjbiv,

Are you sure that ATA employees have had the pay freeze lifted or just Chicago Express employees. From your profile I see you're in TOL, that's a C8 station not a TZ station. A lot of the hard working, dedicated people I work with everyday in MDW are still griping about the pay freeze. I agree with you that at ATA we do try harder. That goes from the Captains on the Boeings to ground agents working the flights. I have had the pleasure of having lunch with George (ATA's founder and CEO) and I can tell you he does care about each and every employee and passenger at ATA, which is why it is so surprising to me how this idiot press release ever made it out to the public. I do believe that non-revs (scarlet letters and all) will be in business class when it finally makes its appearance.



Fly the friendly skys and stay out of mine.
User currently offlineFedExIndy From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 77 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2992 times:

Speaking of ATA's pay freeze, they hosed everyone over really bad. Apparently, it lasted from 10/01 thru 10/03. If you worked during that time, you didn't get credit for any time during that period when figuring your wage. In a nutshell, had you started working there in 1995, you wouldn't reach the 10 year wage until after 12 years. Or someone hired in 11/01 and someone hired almost 2 years later in 9/03 would be on the exact pay scale.

User currently offlineFlyinryan99 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 2005 posts, RR: 13
Reply 24, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days ago) and read 2927 times:

I just work here =) At first I was upset that they publicly announced it, but I understand where they were coming from...I still like using my airline as a back up instead of a first choice when non revving...allows me to keep my options open.

Ryan


25 Wmupilot : Just as Flyingryan99 said, I too was angered by the announcement that was made to the public about it. It should have been an internal matter. It will
26 Travatl : Internal matter or not, this policy is a poor one. Have I ever worked for ATA, no. But I have worked for commercial airlines since I was 18. I was so
27 Heisan67 : But if you are flying stand by as an employee and the economy class is full....the best thing for the passengers would be to up-grade some in the econ
28 TZFALAX : As an ATA employee, I was very angered with the fact that this statement was issued pubically on our website as well as in USA Today. I emailed corpor
29 Jaysit : Shouldn't a seat worth several thousands of dollars be reserved for those PAYING for it? Makes perfect sense to me.
30 717-200 : Jaysit, I do not belive that a biz class seat on ATA will be worth several thousands of dollars. We're talking an LCC here!
31 TZFALAX : Jaysit, again, as an ATA employee, I agree with you. Save the biz class seats that are worth up to $399 for paying passengers. My checkbook will thank
32 MSYtristar : When I joined Vanguard in May 2001, we were just starting our "SkyBox Business Class" service on the MD-80/87's that we were just receiving. I remembe
33 Md80spirit : Spirt is free is coach and only $25 for spirit plus(biz class). If the seat is gonna go out empty, at least get 25$ from the employee's. Charge the no
34 Kevin752 : I agree with most of the people that say that this press release IS VERY DISRESPECTFUL!!! I feel that the airline does not value thier flight attenda
35 Jcs17 : If I was an ATA employee, I'd be pretty pissed off. If space is availible, there is no reason why an employee should not be able to sit up front. That
36 Asuflyer05 : I think we are jumping the gun here. We need to see what ATA's policy on it's business class will be. Will they be providing free upgrades to frequent
37 Midway2airtran : Topic is not the policy itself, though that could be debated too as well. The topic is the fact that this was released publicly, tarnishing the moral
38 TZFALAX : The officers sent out a statement basically telling us to shut up and deal with it.
39 TZSFO : TZFALAX - The officers did not send out a message telling you "to shut up and deal with it". They sent out a message saying that it was important to s
40 Luv2fly : TZSFO The original Midway use to charge non revs a service charge for there business class product, it was like only $25.00 and was a good deal, and m
41 Ushermittwoch : I would think that ANY airline prefers its customers to fill up the premium seats on their flights. After all THEY are the one that keep the money com
42 PA110 : Most flights I have taken recently, the number of frequent fliers eligible to upgrade have greatly exceeded the number of available seats in the premi
43 Post contains images Flyguyclt : It is obvious. The founder of ATA is a Republican. The haves and the have nots have been now established at ATA. I'll bet he will fly up front. Safe F
44 Flpuck6 : On my airline, we are also worth only Y class. But things can change once the doors are closed ...chutttttt.
45 TZFALAX : TZSFO, I don't care where I sit. I don't even non-rev on ATA. As a non-rev, I'm treated better at other carriers (WN, B6 and AS). Again, my point, as
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is This The Only Business Class IFE? posted Thu Apr 6 2006 21:03:16 by RootsAir
ATA To Add Business Class posted Thu Aug 26 2004 19:47:03 by Mikey711MN
ATA To Add Business Class posted Sun Mar 14 2004 21:46:30 by Jeffrey1970
ATA To Offer Business Class posted Thu Feb 5 2004 22:25:03 by MAH4546
MNC's Operating "Employees Only" Scheduled Flights posted Sat Nov 29 2003 15:16:25 by Indianguy
ATA Employees....how Are Things? posted Thu Nov 27 2003 19:39:03 by SRD737NG
Was United Only Worth $233 Million? posted Thu Aug 8 2002 02:08:41 by Timz
ATA Employees - Please Help posted Fri Dec 28 2001 23:45:39 by Unitedflyer1
Eos' Ex-Employees File Class Action Lawsuit posted Mon May 19 2008 06:37:48 by ThirteenRight
Business Class Only Airline In OZ posted Mon Dec 31 2007 00:28:07 by Ansett767