Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UA Equipment Changes  
User currently offlineStarGoldLHR From Heard and McDonald Islands, joined Feb 2004, 1529 posts, RR: 1
Posted (10 years 6 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2146 times:

Anyone know why United recently canned 767's on it's LHR-JFK route. These are now handled by 777's.

At the same time the 777's have gone off the SFO-LHR replaced by older 747-400's.

Are more people going to SFO/JFK now than before during winter hence the increase in capacity ?

I noticed theres only 2 LHR-JFK flights daily with United now as well, though SFO still has it's two daily flights



So far in 2008 45 flights and Gold already. JFK, IAD, LGA, SIN, HKG, NRT, AKL, PPT, LAX still to book ! Home Airport LCY
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineOrd747cle From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 240 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2092 times:

My guess is that demand is picking up!!

Ord747Cle


User currently offlineSyncmaster From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 2028 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2082 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Because the loads require it to be so. At the time the 763 was probably much cheaper to operate then a 772 and 744, hence why some were parked. Now that they have negotiated lower cost's for these planes, they can be operated to their fullest extent.

User currently offlineFA4UA From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 812 posts, RR: 20
Reply 3, posted (10 years 6 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2015 times:

When we cancelled EWR-LHR the extra capacity was needed out of Kennedy. The 777 is also more competitive out of JFK against AA which runs more 777's in terms of customer service (the 777 is always customer's favourite).

My guess for the upgauge in equipment on the double daily SFO-LHR is because we used to operate thrice daily. This summer a 744 and a 772 will make do. The summer of 2001 we offered thrice daily service with a 763 as the late departure from SFO. I can't remember this flight ever going out full, so I think the 744 and 777 this summer should do fine (not too much ASM on this route). We also need to keep ASM's in check on this route as it is consistentently one of our most profitable routes.

FA4UA



The debate continues... Starwood or Hyatt... which is better
User currently offlineIndustrialPate From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 months 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 1878 times:

At the same time the 777's have gone off the SFO-LHR replaced by older 747-400's.

UA's B747 and B777 are about the same age (some B744 are a few years older, certainly not enough to make a difference). There's a good chance you'll fly on a B747 newer than a B777....

...the 777 is always customer's favourite.

Only because of the product inside the 777. There's a big, big difference between First Class on UA's three-class B763 and B777.


User currently offlineFlyboy80 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1878 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (10 years 6 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1787 times:

Actually... I thought UA had some 744s from like the first years on the 90's and even the 80s????? And there newest aircraft are very few that were delivered around 98 right?

User currently offlineMymiles2go From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 207 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 6 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1709 times:

As IndustrialPate mentioned, United' 744's are actually quite young. While I can't offhand find a listing of all birthdates of all the 744 United currently owns, since Boeing didn't start completing 744 certifications until January of 1989 (and progressivly on various enginees throughout 1989), even if United did end up with some of the first 744s, they'd be just a touch over a decade old. But... I know United had many 744's delivered in the later portion of the 90's (98/99 if I remember correctly).

That all said... for aircraft - especially long haul aircraft - being a decade old doesn't mean much at all. That's still young in aircraft terms. Also, keep in mind, the only the that probably makes United 744's feel "older" is the lack of PTV's in coach, something many other carriers do have, thus making them feel newer.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Equipment Changes For AA Out Of SFO 9/6 posted Fri Aug 4 2006 21:05:20 by Funbird1
Qatar Airways EU/LHR Equipment Changes posted Sat Apr 15 2006 05:53:28 by Behramjee
PIA Summer 2006 Equipment Changes posted Fri Mar 24 2006 20:15:22 by Behramjee
Mission Completed! All UA Equipment Types Painted! posted Tue Dec 6 2005 04:56:53 by ERJ145LR
CX NGO-HKG: Equipment Changes posted Mon Aug 22 2005 05:38:24 by Centrair
Equipment Changes - Help! posted Fri Feb 13 2004 00:14:49 by Jeffie813
How Long Till UA Fleet Changes Are In Effect? posted Tue Oct 16 2001 21:32:57 by Highliner2
UA Schedule Changes For Germany posted Sun Oct 14 2001 10:16:27 by Lhuaaua
USAirways/Metrojet Equipment Changes posted Tue Apr 10 2001 04:55:01 by CVG777
Last Minute Equipment Changes posted Tue Jul 11 2000 18:11:23 by PresRDC