Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Changes Going On @ LAX  
User currently offlineAirxLiban From Lebanon, joined Oct 2003, 4511 posts, RR: 53
Posted (10 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2224 times:

This was discussed somewhat recently in a thread titled "Branson approahces Schwarzenegger" or something to that effect...asking the governor if he would prepare LAX for the A380.

I don't know how recent this is but I was just browsing www.laxmasterplan.org and the changes they are going to be make are interesting.

Sorry if this has already been discussed recently.

Here is a quick synopsis of the reading:

Changes:

1. Centre Taxiways to improve air field safety

2. More gate space to accomodate 78.9 MAP

3. Reconfiguring Bradley so that it becomes "capable of handling wide-body aircraft" by using the existing remote stands on the westend

4. Satelitte Concourse to accomodate relocated gates

5. Demolish parking structures and add terminal buildings and add more screenings, this area will be CTA Central Terminal Area, only flyaway buses and service/emergency vehicles will be able to access this area

6. West employee parking structure (new)

7. Ground Transportation centre where drop offs will be allowed. Passengers will be ushered to the CTA from this area on an "automated people mover" which will take 5 minutes.

Anyway, all this info is on www.laxmasterplan.org under the Alternatives Under Study tab -> Recommended Alternative.

Last I checked, Bradley was already capable of handling "wide-body" aircraft unless 747s, 767s, 777's and A340s are not wide body aircrafts anymore  Smile (n.b. I saw the SQ A345 at LAX this afternoon. Those engines are big)

I guess the A380 will be accomodated at those remote stands after they add gates. I wonder if they will connect these stands to the main passenger terminal.

Cali always wants to be at the forefront of everything and I guess this is the way they are doing it at LAX. It seems like it is only going to complicate matters, but I suppose in the end doing anything in the name of safety is OK.

In any event, does anyone know when this plan will be implemented? LAX will hardly be ready for the A380 by next year.

how big of a deal is this, really? Aren't airlines such as KE, VS, AF, LH? QF? SQ? all planning to operate the A380 to LAX? Things could get disastrous if they had what, 7 A380s all landing within a short time frame.

Presuming that I haven't forgotten anyone and I haven't presumed incorrectly about KE AF VS LH QF SQ...so if AF VS LH and SQ are all there at one time and QF and KE are there earlier in the morning, that is still a fair amount of passengers flooding into the terminal buildings, going through immigration, getting their bags, etc. System overflow?


Air Liban


PARIS, FRANCE...THE BEIRUT OF EUROPE.
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTom in NO From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 7194 posts, RR: 33
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2120 times:

The topic of LAX upgrades got a lot of play, and got somewhat controversial at times in the following thread, which we ran a couple of months ago. Enjoy!

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1295006

Tom at MSY



"The criminal ineptitude makes you furious"-Bruce Springsteen, after seeing firsthand the damage from Hurricane Katrina
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8130 posts, RR: 26
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2085 times:

LAX will hardly be ready for *any* kind of growth until politicians in Los Angeles stop pandering to NIMBYs in the surrounding communities while entertaining pipe dream notions of relieving traffic at other area airports already hemmed in by development and neighborhood opposition.


If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineLAN767Andres From Chile, joined Mar 2004, 46 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2040 times:

Thanks for keeping us informed of whats going on at LAXBig grin


Andrés Braun SCL
User currently offlineCmckeithen From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 617 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1997 times:

It's about time they do something with LAX. It is still in the 1980's. What the heck is that UGLY spider thing in the center of it.

User currently offlineAirxLiban From Lebanon, joined Oct 2003, 4511 posts, RR: 53
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1957 times:

that "UGLY spider thing" is a restaurant/cafe.

I'll agree with you guys though, it still has the feel of an airport in the 1980s.



PARIS, FRANCE...THE BEIRUT OF EUROPE.
User currently offlineDpr From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 13 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1922 times:

I live out in Redlands (90-minute drive east of LAX) and am of the opinion that many of these international operations would benefit greatly from a shift to Ontario (ONT), which, in my opinion, is a heavily underutilized resource. It seems that it would be a small matter to demolish it's older, unused terminal, relocate some parking lots, and build a new international terminal.

Also, ONT's ground traffic is but a small fraction of LAX's. There are not enough profanities in the English language to accurately describe the traffic in and around LAX.


User currently offlineWilliam From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1262 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1886 times:

That 'spider thing' or resturant is what make LAX what it is.....its what seperates it from other airport.....Or should all airports look like ATL and DIA?

User currently offlineUnited_Fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7484 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1840 times:

It's called the 'Theme Biulding',the restaurant is 'Encounters'.


'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offlineTom in NO From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 7194 posts, RR: 33
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1809 times:

And when the observation deck on top of the so-called "ugly spider thing" is open, you have one of the better overall views of airports and airplanes going.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © TJ OKeefe



Tom at MSY



"The criminal ineptitude makes you furious"-Bruce Springsteen, after seeing firsthand the damage from Hurricane Katrina
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Whats Going On With EL AL In LAX? posted Tue Nov 7 2006 05:38:42 by Access-Air
Anything Going On At LAX? posted Tue Jan 3 2006 22:16:42 by Tzadik
NRT, LAX, LHR, whats going on? posted Sat Nov 28 1998 00:17:24 by flyf15
Did UA Use 747 222B Or 238B On LAX-NRT 1997? posted Sat Nov 4 2006 21:35:45 by 747400sp
Whats Going On With This 777 posted Sun Oct 15 2006 19:29:33 by J41
AA 930 GRU-MIA What Is Going On? posted Mon Oct 9 2006 01:28:16 by Sflaflight
Whats Going On With Delta.com? posted Wed Sep 27 2006 22:47:53 by Positiverate
What's Going On In ATL Right Now? posted Mon Sep 25 2006 01:58:55 by DLX737200
What Is Going On With This 747? posted Fri Sep 15 2006 02:07:33 by Voyager747
What's Going On With Trump's VP-BDJ? posted Thu Sep 14 2006 01:30:17 by United_Fan