Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CRJ200 Window Height Raise?  
User currently offlineVoodoo From Niue, joined Mar 2001, 2053 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2065 times:

Just wondering if there has ever been any mention of raising the cabin window height level on the Bombardier CRJ short body model to that enjoyed by the 700-900? It would seem to me that there is an ample backlog of orders to be able to fit this marketing advantage in, and that it must share some fuselage `barrels' with the larger models anyway.

[Edited 2004-03-03 12:41:33]


` Yeaah! Baade 152! Trabi of the Sky! '
23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2047 times:


Hi Voodoo!

I understand your topic very well and I aplaude it!!! The CRJ200 is incredible concerning window issues! I experience that when I flew from FAT to PHX with America West Express, I'm 6 feet tall and I had to slide down the best I could to take some decent pictures, those windows are just good for young children I bet! Also like you said about the CRJ700/900 those windows look much more decent, I also flew on a America West Express CRJ700 on the oposite way and it was a difference, also the confort and flight attitude of the CRJ700 is just fantastic! I was very impressed with the CRJ700 and in it's range I don't know if there is anything better.
regards


User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1976 times:

Bombardier has confirmed that they will NOT be using the same fuselage panels and windows from the CR700/900 on the CRJ200 line in the future.

I have no idea why. I thought it would save some money in common tooling...but apparently not. Likely they did not want to recertify with this modification.

Airlines really don't care...it appears to be a passenger/enthusiast issue.

Personally, I think the windows on the CR700 turn it into a completely different experience as far as the perception of more space.


User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4482 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1953 times:

I have no idea why. I thought it would save some money in common tooling...but apparently not. Likely they did not want to recertify with this modification.

Probably. Recertification is a HUGE deal. Even though the same basic shape is the same, the construction is different. Not only are the windows raised, but the cabin floor is also lowered, etc.

Also, what airline would want to pick up factory new CRJ200's that were basically different airplanes than their "classics"?

Common tooling? Hello....Challenger 604  Big grin



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1951 times:


Hi!

But we must admit that this issue is quite relevant, look for example the ERJ145, the plane infact is must more cramped than the CRJ200 but their windows have much better view!!!
Well like you said it's just a side issue!
regards


User currently offlineQIguy24 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1942 times:

I would also be very glad if they raised the wíndows in the CRJ200.
I have the same problem as CV990. Im a tall bastard who also enjoys looking out of the window in 33.000 feet and enjoy the heavy traffic over Germany.
And I fly the CRJ2003 times pr month from BSL-CPH-BSL.
The CRJ200 is one of my favourite aircrafts, but they have a big minus. And that is the window positions.  Sad


User currently offlineDAL12 From United States of America, joined Jun 2003, 89 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1912 times:

The window placement is not the only factor in making the CRJ-700 seem roomier than the CRJ-200. It actually IS roomier -- the cabin floor has been lowered by an inch. An update that would make sense is a CR7 shrink into a 50 seater, however the returns are just not there since the 50-seat market is very rapidly evaporating.

User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1912 times:


Hi Qlguy24!

How do you manage to see outside? Man it's terrible to see anything above, actually what you really have is a great view under you right????
What airline do you fly to CPH from BSL?
regards


User currently offlineQIguy24 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1872 times:

Hey CV990
Its very easy. But I often have a neckpain 2-3 days after....  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
Thank god I'm on Business class om every flight ´so I have 2 seats for my self. So I can se both up and down. hehe  Big thumbs up
I fly Cimber Air when I fly that route because they are the only ones flying that route directly BSL-CPH and they provide very good service.


User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1821 times:


Hi Qlguy24.

Man that's what I call a big commitment with our cause, having neckpains to see in those wierd CRJ200 windows, Canadair should pay an appointment in a quiriopatic doctor due to that!
Thanks for the information about the airline, Cimber Air is interesting, those guys are still around, that's great! I remember Cimber Air when they had those VFW614's, very strange airplane!!!!!
regards


User currently offlineMD80Nut From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 888 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1816 times:

The only complaint I have about Bombardier's CRJ200s is those windows are just too damn low! And it isn't just tall people, I'm just 5 ft. 6 in. (that's 1.67 or so meters) and I still have to hunch down to look out the window! Most annoying for a dedicated window seater like me. Otherwise, I like the CRJ200.

I'm glad to hear the CRJ700 & 900 have raised the windows some.

cheers, Ralph



Fly Douglas Jets DC-8 / DC-9 / DC-10 / MD80 / MD11 / MD90 / 717
User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1798 times:


All right, this is getting global, MD80Nut!

So this is not just an issue for the big guys, this is for ALL guys!!!! Maybe Canadair see this topic and make some changes!
regards


User currently offlineQIguy24 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1797 times:

I have also been in Cockpit on that flight a couple of times. Its really a small cockpit. The second last flight I was on, I asked if I was allowed to sit in cockpit to try it. And the pilots accepted it right away. It was even more awesome the to get neckpains from the low windows in the cabin!!  Big thumbs up
And they gave me a headset so I could listen to what was going on. It was really awesome.
Right after we had passed FRA we had a Emirates 772 1000 feet right above us. You could hear the engine on that beautiful bird!!


User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4482 posts, RR: 22
Reply 13, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1740 times:

So this is not just an issue for the big guys, this is for ALL guys!!!! Maybe Canadair see this topic and make some changes!

CV990. Never going to happen. As someone mentioned already, the 50-seater market is rapidly evaporating (it's saturated with CRJ100/200's and EMB's!). There's no need to spend the extra R&D...and trust me, there's a LOT more of that involved than you'd let on.

The window placement is not the only factor in making the CRJ-700 seem roomier than the CRJ-200. It actually IS roomier -- the cabin floor has been lowered by an inch.

DAL12, if you had read my post you would have seen that I already mentioned that the cabin floor was lowered  Big grin

You could hear the engine on that beautiful bird!!

Oh, is that so? Over the slipstream noise at cruise no less?  Yeah sure



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineQIguy24 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1730 times:

Sorry.....

I forgot a little word called Almost... Satisfied JBird??
Of course I know its not possible to hear the engine. I work in the airline industry my self and know a little bit about those things.

[Edited 2004-03-03 17:14:57]

User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4482 posts, RR: 22
Reply 15, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1691 times:

Furthermore, you always fly Business Class? On a CRJ? Cimber Air? Did they introduce a business cabin? They always give you an adjoining empty seat? Really? Hmmmmmm.

And I saw your post before you edited it...and you said Yes, it IS so  Big grin

Hmmmmm!!!!!!!

[Edited 2004-03-03 17:17:03]


I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16908 posts, RR: 67
Reply 16, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1673 times:

It amuses me that so many enthusiasts labor under the assumption that the airlines and airframers actually care about this sort of thing more than, say, fuel economy...


"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4482 posts, RR: 22
Reply 17, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1662 times:

Starlionblue,

And that's why they are "enthusiasts" and will always stay "enthusiasts"  Big grin



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineQIguy24 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1656 times:

JBirdAV8r

Hmmm..... Lets see. Yes I fly business class when I fly them. And yes they have a business class. And the reason why i sit there is because I work for them my self..... Satisfied?  Big grin

And I know I made a little mistake. But I found out after I had written the last message that I forgot the word Almost..........
You have probably forgotten some words in here your self once a while. Shit happens  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16908 posts, RR: 67
Reply 19, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1643 times:

JBirdAV8r: I'm not saying I don't care. And the airframer probably cares as well. I just don't think it's a top issue with them, or they would have made the plane different from the get go.


"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4482 posts, RR: 22
Reply 20, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1643 times:

QI guy,

Wow, gee. Isn't that quite convenient for you?  Yeah sure

Have fun in your sales agent job; I mean, I know it so heavily involves working around the aircraft  Big grin

[Edited 2004-03-03 17:30:05]


I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4482 posts, RR: 22
Reply 21, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1623 times:

Starlionblue,

I know. I was just pointing out that the people who get so mad that Bombardier won't undertake a MAJOR redesign of their airplane to suit their needs is nothing but an enthusiast.

Wasn't picking on you, I promise.  Big grin



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineQIguy24 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1610 times:

Thank you for the sarcasm.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy Appreciate it. hehe
I don't think its pretty convenient at all. I wish we had bigger aircrafts. Then it would be funnier to sit in business.


User currently offlinePlanemaker From Tuvalu, joined Aug 2003, 5925 posts, RR: 34
Reply 23, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1531 times:

BBD had plans to develop the "CRJ-500" 4 years ago - it would have been a shortened 700. The CRJ-200 in fact has virtually no rotable and system commonality with the -700/900. Pilots have to go through more differences training switching from a 700 to a 200 (and vice versa) than from the 700 to the 900. Furthermore, the -200 has had certain problems since introduction (eg. the flaps) and operational limitations (eg. the 700 has better field performance w/50 pax then the 200 and some airlines therefore schedule a 700 instead of a 200 on a certain route). BBD dropped the plan because the market was not there.

Futher notes on the size differences between the 700/900 and the 200: While the 700/900 have a slightly taller cabin due to the lowered floor, this resulted in floor level cabin width being narrower by a few inches on the 700/900 than on the 200. If you sit beside the window on the 700/900, you cannot sit with your outboard leg straight in front of you - you have to cant it more inboard than on the -200. The 700/900 cabin is 1" wider than the 200 as BBD engineers were able to shave 1/2" off the frames.

on a related note, BBD had a similar plan to turn the Q300 into the Q500 by using the Q400 wing, powerplant and systems. Again, BBD stopped development because there was no market.



Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
VX And AA Raise Checked Bag Fees posted Fri Aug 21 2009 12:00:58 by Crosswinds21
DFW Airport Will Raise Parking Rates In October posted Wed Aug 5 2009 08:49:52 by ILUVflyWN
AA The Next To Raise Bag Fees posted Fri Jul 24 2009 13:38:27 by Longhornmaniac
Take Off/landing With Window Shades Down? posted Wed Jul 22 2009 04:15:58 by Cambrian
Video Of The New Boeing 787 Window Shades posted Wed Jun 24 2009 07:45:14 by GetYourFlyx
What Happens If They Raise The Pandemic Level To 6 posted Thu Jun 11 2009 05:50:44 by Astockla
Which Is The Non-window Row On AA 738s? posted Fri May 8 2009 11:37:27 by LVTMB
737-800 Window Question posted Tue May 5 2009 20:03:25 by BRJ
AA New B737 Exit Row Window Seats posted Thu Apr 23 2009 17:46:28 by AAAL
Don't Use The Window Exits In A Water Landing? posted Wed Mar 25 2009 11:11:55 by Yflyer