Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Would You Pay $1,500 To Take Aviation Pictures?  
User currently offlineAs739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6074 posts, RR: 24
Posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 4346 times:

The day after getting the first shots of the new United livery here at San Francisco, my co-worker went out for a few more pictures. The next date SFO Air Field Safety gave him a citation. Taking pictures is illegal, though we have never been told that. So my co-workers takes the route need to get a permit to take pictures on the field. Today he finally got to the permit office. Its not $15 for a 24 hour permit, not $50, but $1,500 for 24 HOURS! You have to be joking. The airport gives me a badge to go anywhere on this airport I want and need. I go through no security to get to the gates or my office. I passed a 10 year background check by the airport and Customs. Yet, I can not take a picture. Is SFO really becoming the joke I feel it may be. Its take me a little while to make $1,500 my friend and I'm not spending it on a days pass to take pictures. If I do they are taking me anywhere I want. What do you guys think? I understand the whole security arguement, but why the heck did you give me a airport badge if you are worried about me?
ASSFO


"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineUAL Bagsmasher From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2146 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4298 times:

ORD is the same way. The DOA cops will write you a ticket faster than you can say Rent-a-Cop.

User currently offlineNetdhaka From Bangladesh, joined Feb 2004, 183 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4237 times:

I would not pay that much. It's way too much! Instead, I would probably take a vacation with that kind of money or buy something I really want.

User currently offlineAirshowdawg From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4214 times:

Does this mean taking pics at the airport of the airport? What about an off site photo?

I would throw the ticket on the ground in front of em and piss on it. Just like the manager did in the movie "major league"

Karl


User currently offlineCancidas From Poland, joined Jul 2003, 4112 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4193 times:

wait, so you have unlimited access for $1500? that makes no sense! you ahve to go through so much bs to get on the ramp and other areas of the airport, and all you needed to do is pay? damn.... someone screwed up! this is more of a threat to aviation than drunken GA pilots!


"...cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home."
User currently offlineThrust From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 2688 posts, RR: 10
Reply 5, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4125 times:

Please... as much fun as it is to photograph airliners, probably more fun for me than anything, ain't no way I'm being charged that amount of cash to do it. Money can't buy happiness, especially from the despair you would feel after wasting all that money like that! Photographing planes should be a free opportunity, for pleasure, and should be priceless...in cash, anyway.


Fly one thing; Fly it well
User currently offlineFLYtoEGCC From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 947 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4086 times:

I'm more worried about the security aspect than anything else. $1500 is nothing to an organisation like Al-Qaeda. I know the security procedures are very tight (10-year background check, etc), and would-be terrorists would most likely be stopped, but it is only a matter of time before someone slips through the net, gets into what should be a secure area, and wreaks havoc.


Come fly with me, let's fly, let's fly away...
User currently offlineAviatorTJ From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1838 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 4018 times:

Maybe it's just me, but I am more concerned hearing that there are tickets being written for taking pictures! I smell bull shit at SFO and ORD.  Angry

__TJ__


User currently offlineAs739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6074 posts, RR: 24
Reply 8, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3986 times:

Its is bullshit Aviator. I saw the citation my buddy got. Luckily it was not a big fine. After talking with the Air Field Safety manager it looks like they are working something out between the two of them. The AFO Manager didn't even know it was that expesive, thats what shocked me.
ASSFO



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offline7574EVER From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 478 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3962 times:

I know it's kinda off topic, but if I'm traveling it's illegal to take a picture from the gate area of the aircraft I'll be traveling on? Or, does this just apply to sitting at the end of the runway and taking pics?


Right rudder....Right rudder...Come on, more right rudder....Right rudder......Aw forget it, I quit!!
User currently offlineAviatorTJ From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1838 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3923 times:

757,
I do not believe there is a written rule regarding it. In general, US airports will allow it at the gate area. I just did it through three separate airports last week.

AS739X,
How much was that ticket? Are there any things around there that say there is no photography? We are losing our rights fast. Photography harms nobody.

__TJ__


User currently offlineUal747den From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2392 posts, RR: 12
Reply 11, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3907 times:

Is the fine due to the fact that you work there and are using the facility badge for your own good and profit (if you are) I have never herd of a tourist being asked to not take pictures however I can see where they might be coming from if they think that you are using their facility to make profit on the pics. If I want to use a structure as a backdrop in pictures that I take for advertising I must pay the owner for whatever is in the background to be in the picture. But if this is just to take pics for anyone for any reason that is a bunch of smelly brown stuff...!


/// UNITED AIRLINES
User currently offlineAviatorTJ From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1838 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3854 times:

UAL747DEN,
I have to disagree with you. If we went by what you said, we would be paying to the airlines, airports, caterers, etc. If I took a picture of the skyscrapers downtown for the Dept of Tourism, would I have pay Wells Fargo for their tower being in the ad? Either way, picture taking should not be something that is restricted unless it is of a security checkpoint or of something of the sort. Even still, what is someone going to with shots of that?

__TJ__


User currently offlineDlx737200 From United States of America, joined May 2001, 1901 posts, RR: 20
Reply 13, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3855 times:

I have been asked in ATL by TSA agents to please refrain from video taping and snapping pictures in the airport. I always video tape as well as take pictures with my digital camera while I travel. While I was waiting on the underground train in ATL to come, I was snapping pictures of the signs saying, "Concourse B ---> Concourse C --->" etc, etc. All of a sudden a TSA agent literally RUNS up to me and says, "Sir, unless you're photographing or filming family, you may not use photography of any form in the airport." I said, "With all due respect Ma'am, Since when?" She said, "Since 9/11!" That cracked me up. I love how TSA agents make up rules.  Big thumbs up  Insane So I stopped taking video and pictures until I got on the train where I started to take more video and then took several pics later while I waited for my plane in Concourse A. TSA agents, gotta love 'em!  Wink/being sarcastic

[Edited 2004-03-04 03:27:12]

User currently offlineAviatorTJ From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1838 posts, RR: 7
Reply 14, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3807 times:

Too bad, I don't think that is in the TSA's department.

User currently offlineCanadianNorth From Canada, joined Aug 2002, 3389 posts, RR: 9
Reply 15, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3777 times:

I photgraphed the hell out of the airshow here, both aircraft in the show and aircraft operating the scheds, and even the airport itself. Other than the film i didnt have to fork out a penny for it...

City folk. Go figure.
CanadianNorth

[Edited 2004-03-04 03:37:21]


What could possibly go wrong?
User currently offlineNwadc10 From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 42 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3763 times:

I was told by a security officer that taking pictures inside the terminal at O'Hare was not allowed. I was taking a picture of a dinosaur statue.

User currently offlineVirgin747 From Canada, joined Oct 1999, 319 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3718 times:

hmmm... Outhere in Winnipeg the security just smiles and waves at us, and we got all out of the bag, meaning scanners, cameras, and my laptop. And inside the airport they even let me plug into the wall........

User currently offlineAviaar From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 244 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3624 times:

That doesn't make any sense...$1,500?

When did this rule take effect? It seems that many people have been taking pictures without a problem at the airport before this. Do you mean that within the airport property, like on the ramp, or anywhere around the airport?

The charge [$1500] has to be a violation of some sort-you're only taking pictures. I guess everything these days costs something.



I'd rather be flying (real original)
User currently offlineSxmarbury33 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 445 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3587 times:

How about a happy medium of a small fee say 75 bucks a year and you get acsess to all the usual areas around the airport you would anyway. They would run the extensive background checks etc, whatever they do these days and in return you get a card, badge etc to show an officer if stopped valid for one year. 75 is reasonable amount for a hobby expenditure and would ensure most spotters would be throughoghly checked out.

User currently offlineAs739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6074 posts, RR: 24
Reply 20, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3572 times:

The citation was a warning, but he was told to talk to the authority's. He was given a phone number. There are no signs and no where when you get highered by an airline does the badge test say no photography. Yes, our rights are getting screwed.
The $1,500 dollars is (our guess) the cost for a permit if you were here to film a commercial, or take pictures for your respecte carrier. They have no seperate permit for pleasure photo's, that what sucks!
ASSFO



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offline2912n From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 2013 posts, RR: 8
Reply 21, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3511 times:

First of all you need to seperate a couple of issues. When you are working at an airport you are at the whims of your employer. That means they may not want you taking photos of airplanes airside where the general public does not go. The airport authority has that right over employees.

Many places have limits on commercial photography on their premises, nothing new.
Trying to say here that the airport is demanding a huge amount of money from people to shoot photos is a bit silly. Again, what goes on airside is in their control and they make money off of companies filming etc on airport property. (in addition for that fee they usually provide escorts etc...)




User currently offlineAs739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6074 posts, RR: 24
Reply 22, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3455 times:

2912n...Alaska Airlines could care less if I am taking photo's. Why would they care? I understand the airport authority has the right, that not my complaint. My complint is if you are not suppose to do something, inform the people. No one here knows you are not allowed to take pictures. You don't enforce rules that people don't know about. I have worked at SFO 7 1/2 years and never been told or informed the rules changed. With the escorts, where the hell they going to take me that is worth $1500. I have access to most everywhere I care to go. I can also pick up a ride to the end of the runways anytime. I just think that price is steep for the aviation buff that does it for fun.
ASSFO



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineFreshlove1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3423 times:

The cops have nothing better to do then harass us photo takers. I am so sick of them thinking that they can do anything once they put on the badge. They can not write you a citation with out first giving you a warning about not taking photos. If its not posted then they are probably just making it up. I agree it is a bunch of B.S

User currently offlineJjbiv From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1226 posts, RR: 5
Reply 24, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3390 times:

Here's the deal:

They aren't worried about you taking photos, they are worried about what you may capture in those photos. Remember the "scandal" a few years ago when an "investigative reporter" from WCCO in MSP captured images of NW rampers throwing mail around Christmas time? You'd think they were stealing from kiddies and grandma on the street judging by the reaction the story got.

In an industry like aviation, it's impossible to run a 100% clean operation 100% of the time. The easy "solution" is to keep outsiders out. Hence, no photography.

That said, this reminds me of the benefits of working at a smaller airport. Reality can be sad; I feel for you.

joe


25 QIguy24 : What is going on over there?? Is everything forbidden now or what because of safety reasons? That is the moste redicilous thing I have ever heard!! Wh
26 As739x : Understandable Joe, but these were runway shots. I look right at the ramp from my office and get on my rampers about throwing bags every time I see it
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Dilemma - Would You Pay £40 To Fly A 722? posted Sun Nov 20 2005 09:29:26 by Varig_dc10
How Much Would You Pay To Earn FF Status? posted Thu Apr 15 2004 16:20:15 by Zrs70
How Much Extra Would You Pay To Avoid A LCC posted Thu Apr 15 2004 11:21:25 by Eugdog
Would You Pay...? posted Fri Jul 16 2004 22:34:02 by MHTMDW
How Much Would You Pay For This Tour? posted Thu May 13 2004 15:47:35 by Pe@rson
HLX: How Much Would You Pay? posted Fri Mar 5 2004 18:15:02 by ManchesterMAN
Would You Pay Per View On PTV? posted Thu Oct 9 2003 21:21:12 by 767Lover
What Would You Most Like To See In A New Airline? posted Sat Sep 27 2003 20:36:10 by Wgw2707
How Do U Know Wich Plane You Are Going To Take? posted Sat Jul 7 2001 03:57:06 by Crank
Sonic Cruiser - Would You Pay Extra? posted Mon Jul 2 2001 23:24:26 by Teej13