Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Surprise-AA Will Be Huge At DFW Terminal D  
User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 6075 times:

http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/local/8103579.htm

Even more AA expansion at DFW? Sure, I'd love to see more diversity, but overall, this would be good for the airport. More destinations, more flights, more passengers -- I'll take it!

[Edited 2004-03-04 17:12:20]


"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
30 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineKKMolokai From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 760 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 5963 times:

Very interesting article. It'll be great to see AA expand. I was a little surprised however, that the article mentioned that Terminal D would be used for a mix of domestic and international flights. I was under the impression Terminal D was to be used as a International terminal exclusively, used by all airlines.

Do you suppose AA will shift their Eagle RJs (currently operated out of Terminal B), back to Terminal A, closer to their Eagle satellite terminal, and in turn, consolidate all AA flights in/out of Terminal A, C and D?



We are the people of American Airlines. And we know why you fly.
User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 5929 times:

I too was a bit surprised to see that Terminal D will be a mix of domestic and international, but given the dropoff in international flights after 9/11, they probably had no choice. It would really look bad if they opened the terminal and a quarter of the gates were unused due to lack of demand. Hopefully the new terminal will attract a new international carrier or two and be able to be fully dedicated to international flights in the near future.

I don't know if AA will move their Eagle operation, although I think it would make sense. Many of the "A" gates near the Satellite Terminal can only deal with small aircraft (I don't even know if they can handle MD-80s), so that might be a good move. If the RJ trend continues for a few years, we might possibly see Terminal A being an all-Eagle, all-RJ operation.

I think the biggest question for DFW post-Terminal D will be what to do with Terminal B. BA, Lufthansa, Korean Air, TACA, Aeromexico, and Air Canada will all be moving over to Terminal D. If AA were to leave Terminal B as well, B would become an even bigger eyesore. AirTran is planning on expanding in B, of course, but I don't know if that will be enough.

Oops ... I mentioned two airlines that aren't in B ... Aeromexico operates out of E with its Delta codeshare, and TACA operates out of A. So B won't be losing quite as many airlines



[Edited 2004-03-04 17:48:20]


"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently offlineContrails From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 1833 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 5887 times:

I am glad to be hearing good news about airlines and airports for a change. This will no doubt make DFW the busiest airport in the world in a few years.

Great news for the Ft. Worth/Dallas area.



Flying Colors Forever!
User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 5851 times:

This will no doubt make DFW the busiest airport in the world in a few years.


I'd love to see it, Contrails, but that's a big step. It will take a lot more passengers to catch up with ATL and ORD. If UA were to go under, I could see DFW moving to the #2 slot, but with DL feeding more and more pax thru ATL, and AA flying more point-to-point markets, I think it's a long shot.



"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently offlineJsnww81 From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2026 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 5814 times:

I don't know that American would decide to consolidate Eagle ops in Terminal A. They just spent quite a bit of money reconfiguring their Terminal B gates for RJs (granted, those gates were only about five years old) and should have some room to expand there.

The gates on the north side of Terminal A might work for RJs, but the southern-side gates (the current international area) all have HUGE departure lounges and widely spaced jetbridges. I see those gates handling American's limited widebody domestic flights (there aren't many anymore) and 757 flights.

I'm still waiting for the day when the horrible Terminal C 'addition' that was constructed circa 1990 (on the south side) is brought up to the same standards as the rest of the airport. Right now it looks like a bunch of brown mobile homes all tacked together.

Good news on Terminal D - I think that with international expansion being a major focus of AA in the coming years, eventually Terminal D will be used solely for international flights.


User currently offlineBartond From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 789 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 5764 times:

I'm with whoever said that it's just good to see airlines/airports expanding, with all the crap that's gone on in the past few years. It seems like I heard something about Terminal D being a domestic/international terminal early last year. Why the hell are they calling it an international terminal if it's not totally international? Maybe it will be someday.

So AA's international flights along with the (limited number of) international carriers we have can't fill up the new terminal? I'm guessing the domestic flights that will be at Terminal D will be for international connections (i.e. - flights to Miami to connect to Madrid)?

It will be interesting to see what happens to terminal B in the future - I'm guessing it might be an all low cost carrier terminal. ATA might add some flights and AirTran might go over there and maybe Jetblue will get in the game, too.

But what everyone's hoping for is for a foreign carrier or two to grace DFW's presence with the new international terminal. Qantas and/or Eva are my picks.


User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 5733 times:

Bartond --

The original plan was for an all-international terminal, and all international operations will be consolidated in Terminal D when it is complete. In my view, that justifies calling it an "international" terminal.

I think that Terminal A will probably undergo renovation after Terminal D is complete, because there will be no need for the customs facilities there (similar renovations are also likely for Terminals B and E).

I'm trying to figure out the gate allocation at Terminal D. There will be 28 gates, and AA will have 19 of them. BA will have one, LH will have one, Korean will have one, AM will have one, TACA will have one (but could share with AA), and AC will have one. That makes 25, with three left over for charters and expansion. Based on that configuration, it might not take long for the terminal to go all-international. WIth 19 gates, I doubt AA will have much room for domestic flights. They need dedicated gates (if I'm not mistaken) for LGW (probably 2 gates), FRA, ZRH, CDG, and AA), Japan">NRT flights, and then they'll have to split the others up between the Canada, Mexico, and South American flights. So I could see just 7 or 8 gates being used for domestic flights from the outset, and hopefully that number will decrease.



"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently offlineAtcboy73 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1100 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 5723 times:

I think part of the reasoning behind both international and domestic flights at the new terminal might be this.

If an AA MD80 comes in from MEX and then AA wants that flight to continue on to LGA, they might have to reposition it if terminal D was only for international flights. But the way it is going to operate it gives the airlines using it more flexability.

I dont know about a/c seating configurations but could there also be a 777 doing something like MIA-DFW-AA), Japan">NRT some day?

Just something to think about.


User currently offlineTI717 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 227 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 5686 times:

ATCboy you hit the nail on the head. It not that operational wise to use a terminal for only international fights when the terminal is used by a Hub carrier. It been plan this way for a while (5 years +) By what I understand the new 28 gates at DFW will replace the AE hardstand gates and maybe even the AE terminal. This way DFW did not have to a EPA report when they built the terminal. (save money and time)

We will see the "temporary" part of C (south end) go away anytime soon unless it falls down.

With the gate Allocation you have to include schedules charters (all the 727 to Mexico) An by what I understand the other 6 gates (I know 19 + 6 does not equal 28) are all common use therefore there could be a high rate of use if DFW can get the airline to fly in there.


TI717



Sir, don't you think we should turn on the runway lights?" "No, that's just what there expecting us to do!"
User currently offlineJsnww81 From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2026 posts, RR: 15
Reply 10, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 5593 times:

TI717:

I wouldn't be surprised to see the "temporary" part of C fall down. It's really disgraceful looking, although the interior is up to par with the rest of DFW.

The repositioning argument makes sense, particularly since aircraft would have to be taxied all the way around the airport to Terminals A and C.

A few domestic flights certainly won't hurt Terminal D's prestige - particularly if they relocate the "big ticket" domestic ops there (LAX, LGA/EWR, BOS, SFO, MIA, ORD/MDW, etc.) When the Terminal B extension was opened in 1999, it was used for those flights, since they don't typically have as many connecting passengers. I can see American applying that logic to Terminal D as well.


User currently offlineAtcboy73 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1100 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 5492 times:

What gets me is its HUGE!!!

I mean, have you seen it?

I have taxied by it a few times now and its gona dwarf 747s. From the air side it looks like its 10 times bigger than the other terminals.

Well

ok

maybe not 10 times but its big.


User currently offlineAdh214 From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 360 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 5435 times:

Frankly, I will a little concerned with AA taking over 2/3rds of D. Granted, 28 gates will be plenty for DFW's current international operations (Remember gates can be used more than once per day) but will AA swat on those 19 gates in a few years when a new international carrier wants to start flying to DFW such as Air France. UA has done the same thing at DEN and Frontier is not able to expand as fast or as much as they would like. It looks like this might be a predatory move on AA's part.

Andrew


User currently offlinePUDFW From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 119 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 5432 times:

A few people have mentioned this before but I cant see them not allowing terminal D to be full. This will be the best facility in the country maybe even the world, it makes no sense they wouldn't have it filled up.

I cant see AA leaving Terminal B, they spent a lot of money on that part of the airport and currently its the nicest looking part. I think the Eagle Operation from there has been working out pretty well, I haven't heard much different.

Terminal B will lose some big tenants but I am thinking this will allow Airtran to expand more. In my opinion they are the most likely case. No offense to Jet Blue fans but they will get trounced if and when they come to DFW. DFW travelers are very loyal to AA and American will run them out of town. ATL was a good lesson in that.

I think ATA will also expand, along with perhaps more traffic from CO and UAL. I think that will be enough to fill the vacant gates in B pretty well.

It will be interesting to see what is next for DFW though. I think redoing some of the older terminals is probably a good idea. I think B will get an update, although it may not be all of it. And I believe A will get a total redesign but I don't expect that for six years or so. DFW likes to keep American happy so thats where they invest the money.

PUDFW


User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5480 posts, RR: 15
Reply 14, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 5352 times:

PUDFW- It's a smart move on DFW's part to keep AA happy. If AA were to leave DFW, DFW would lose 70% of its pax traffic.

I thought DFW was trying to go the way of european airports in not having dedicated gates to xxx airline as a way to increase gate utilization. Sure, AA has a large international operation out of DFW, but I'm not sure they need 19 gates exclusively for their use.

I hope that once D opens, DFW starts some refreshing of A,B,C, and E.

blink




Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineNickofatlanta From Australia, joined May 2000, 1487 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 5221 times:

"I'm trying to figure out the gate allocation at Terminal D. There will be 28 gates, and AA will have 19 of them. BA will have one, LH will have one, Korean will have one, AM will have one, TACA will have one (but could share with AA), and AC will have one. That makes 25, with three left over for charters and expansion. Based on that configuration, it might not take long for the terminal to go all-international. WIth 19 gates, I doubt AA will have much room for domestic flights. They need dedicated gates (if I'm not mistaken) for LGW (probably 2 gates), FRA, ZRH, CDG, and AA), Japan">AA), Japan">NRT flights, and then they'll have to split the others up between the Canada, Mexico, and South American flights. So I could see just 7 or 8 gates being used for domestic flights from the outset, and hopefully that number will decrease."

With all due respect, I am not quite sure I follow this logic, SSides. It seems like a bit of a waste for AA to (or be allowed by DFW to) dedicate 2 gates at a brand spanking new terminal just for LGW flights as well as one each for FRA, ZRH, AA), Japan">NRT and CDG. Similarly, why would KE get a dedicated gate for their thrice weekly service to ICN.


User currently offlineCkfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5216 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 5181 times:

I'm just curious as to why AC is leaving Terminal B for Terminal D. If UA stays put in B, it makes no sense for a Star partner to move. Most Canadian airports have U.S. Customs and Immigration (I've been through U.S. facilities at YYZ and YYC), so AC doesn't need to be in a terminal with customs facilities.

User currently offlineDelta767300ER From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2562 posts, RR: 12
Reply 17, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 5068 times:

I dont think DFW will overtake ATL as the worlds busiest airport, but I think it can take the #2 spot away from ORD.

-Delta767300ER


User currently offlineBartond From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 789 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 5009 times:

Yep the new terminal looks great from a distance, but does anyone know what type of progress they're making on the terminal overall? DFW's website gives you once-a-year pictures of the progress and I think the last ones were from July 2003.

Does anyone with an inside source know if it will be finished by early 2005, like initially planned?


User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 19, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 5000 times:

I'm just curious as to why AC is leaving Terminal B for Terminal D. If UA stays put in B, it makes no sense for a Star partner to move. Most Canadian airports have U.S. Customs and Immigration (I've been through U.S. facilities at YYZ and YYC), so AC doesn't need to be in a terminal with customs facilities.

You may be right, especially since DFW service has been downgraded to Jazz  Sad



"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently offlineBartond From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 789 posts, RR: 2
Reply 20, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 4970 times:

Scratch my last comment - there are some new pics of the int'l. terminal on dfwairport.com as of February 2004. It's going to be a great facility and I can't wait to take my first flight through there.

User currently offlineAluminumShower From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4851 times:

The press release is a little misleading. Probably 1/3 of AA's expansion has already happened. The percentage of growth that is mentioned is off of a base schedule size from June of last year. Between then and now, AA has already added more flights at DFW. For example, when AA pulled the plug on the STL hub, the added additional DFW-STL flights.

User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 22, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 4767 times:

Scratch my last comment - there are some new pics of the int'l. terminal on dfwairport.com as of February 2004.

I just checked out the web site and couldn't find any new pics. Can you give us a direct link, Bartond?



"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently offlinePVD757 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3412 posts, RR: 17
Reply 23, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 4740 times:

Been hearing some strong rumors of another PVD-DFW soon, as the one they started in November is a great performer...

User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5480 posts, RR: 15
Reply 24, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4682 times:

NickofAtlanta- I think SSides said 2 gates would be allocated for AA's LGW flights because there are two AA flights to LGW that I believe depart roughly around the same time, and you can't exactly fit two aircraft at one gate  Nuts.

I think more than likely, AA won't have 19 gates exclusive to their use, but will have the rights to use 19 gates at a time. The Dallas Morning News reported that DFW was trying to get rid of exclusive-long term leases as it hurt gate utilization.
Case in point, Terminal E. Delta owns the terminal and have sole rights to the gates(with the exception of some charters, AM,CO,and NW). With Delta's mainline flights totalling around 60, that means that most jetways are used no more than twice a day. If DFW owned the rights to the gates(which they will when the lease expires), DFW could allow other operators to use them as a way of increasing utilization.

Basically, I think say, gate D3 won't be to AA's exclusive use, just like say, D21 will not be for KE or BA's exclusive use.

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
25 Atrude777 : aluminumshower- i wouldn't say AA add3ed flights for DFW-STL, more liekly repositioned them we still had/have 10 flights, but since STL cut back they
26 Jcs17 : AA might get 19 gates at terminal D, I'm not really surprised though. They probably could get pretty good utilization out of them with the numerous fl
27 Bartond : See if this link works. It's under Capital Development/Photo Gallery. http://www.dfwairport.com/cdp/photos.htm
28 JayDavis : Just an FYI. CO is no longer in Terminal B. They moved to Terminal E to be with their SkyTeam partners, NW and DL. FL moved from Terminal E to Termina
29 Bartond : I'll paraphrase an article in the March 5-11 issue of the Dallas Business Journal: American may boost by more than 44,000 its number of annual departu
30 Ssides : I agree, Bartond, but what are you going to do? I'm sure people at ATL would want some non-Delta expansion, just like people at IAH would like some no
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Who Will Be In The New A Terminal At SEA? posted Wed Jun 4 2003 08:19:00 by SJCguy
Will American Be Expanding At DFW posted Sat May 20 2000 02:07:57 by Doug
Lie Detector Will Be Used At Security Checks. posted Thu Apr 6 2006 07:24:42 by FXramper
Which New Star Carrier Will Be Next At IAD? posted Wed Oct 27 2004 18:53:34 by PlaneGuy27
What Will Be New At The Dubai Airshow Next Week? posted Wed Dec 3 2003 16:51:02 by KEESJE
Can New Terminals Be Built At DFW? posted Sat Nov 8 2003 16:05:12 by 727LOVER
AA Eagle Emer. Landing At DFW? posted Mon Oct 13 2003 04:43:31 by DFWLandingPath
AA/Eagle Switching Terminals At DFW posted Wed Oct 23 2002 01:55:55 by PSU.DTW.SCE
AA Will Be Discontinuing From ORD-BHX Tomorrow posted Sat Oct 12 2002 17:23:51 by ScottysAir
AA B727 Sighted Recently At DFW posted Thu May 16 2002 15:22:55 by DeltaBoy777