Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ACA Ontime Performance  
User currently offlineNwa747-400 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1337 posts, RR: 4
Posted (10 years 6 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1896 times:

Just a question-

We all know ACA (Atlantic Coast Airlines/United Express and Delta Connection) has the worst ontime performance according to the DOT.

And, we all know that the UX operation at ORD is a mess for all UX carriers involved.

So, once ACA drops ORD and just focuses on IAD/Independence Air, do you think their ontime/baggage numbers improve? Does anyone know the ontime/baggage stats just for their IAD hub? (I guess that was 2 questions)  Big grin

-------------------------------------------
Northwest Airlines. Now you're flying smart.

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCaetravlr From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 908 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1873 times:

Nwa747-400,

No one can really say for sure. However, that is a pretty good question. Who knows what plans they are making. Now that they are going to be dependent on themselves for revenue, they are not going to fly planes that are 7 hours late, and leaving after the next scheduled flight to the same destination, I guarantee you. They will cancel the flight before they expend that fuel. It is going to be a totally different operation, but I am for one very doubtful that management that is used to sending planes up just because they are getting paid on a per departure basis is going to adapt very quickly to having to make smart business decisions. I could be wrong, but I am highly skeptical.

As for the stats, I don't know specifically. I just know I won't miss them flying as UAX.

Regards,
CAETravlr



A woman drove me to drink and I didn't have the decency to thank her. - W.C. Fields
User currently offlineNwa747-400 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1337 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 months 20 hours ago) and read 1820 times:

thanks- anymore thoughts.....

User currently offlineUadc8contrail From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1782 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (10 years 6 months 16 hours ago) and read 1779 times:

nwa747-400,
good thread, the real question if indy has to report to the f.a.a. on o.t.?????are/will they be classified as big enough to report??? if they do then i bet they will cancel and blame it on wx or mech vs run it late and have to report it.....or better yet will they run it late and blame it on wx secondary.....



bus driver.......move that bus:)
User currently offlineNwa747-400 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1337 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 months 6 hours ago) and read 1747 times:

They will be just as big if not bigger than they are now right?

Plus, completion factor is also published by the DOT. Sure, anyone can run an airline 90% on-time if they cancel 20% of their flights!!



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Taca Ontime Performance? posted Fri Mar 3 2006 03:00:25 by PA110
Icelandair SFO-KEF Ontime Performance posted Mon Jun 13 2005 16:47:26 by AS739X
Jetblue's Ontime Performance posted Fri Feb 7 2003 15:07:02 by AASTEW
PIA Ontime Performance Improving Day By Day posted Sun May 20 2001 13:09:54 by GF-A330
Increased Performance Of 772LR posted Thu Feb 22 2007 20:47:15 by Ferdinando
GE Improves "Low And Hot" Performance Of GE90-11X posted Tue Feb 20 2007 17:26:51 by Stitch
Mesa # 1 On Time Performance Here In Phoenix posted Mon Feb 12 2007 21:21:45 by Elcapi1980
Hawaiian Airlines: #1 On-Time Performance For 2006 posted Thu Feb 8 2007 20:40:21 by Kaukau
ACA Schedule Help posted Wed Feb 7 2007 16:46:49 by Alonk
Very Cool FI 757 High Performance Takeoff Video posted Sun Feb 4 2007 21:48:14 by DL757Md