Planemannyc From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 1012 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (11 years 4 months ago) and read 3436 times:
I agree with Mark (LHMARK). Did anyone put any thought into this? Even the photo looks unprofessional. The retro look is horrible. The paint job is dull. Come on, is that the best they can do? Is that how you reach out to 'hip' clients who will use the net to book. No wonder why USAirways is having such difficulties if this is what their marketing / branding team can produce.
Cedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8372 posts, RR: 54
Reply 6, posted (11 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3326 times:
That is not a nice livery. Maybe their way of pretending to paint the 737s when really they're leaving them the same as the old scheme. If they're actually stripping paint off the navy blue fleet for this, they're crazy.
fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
Wagz From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 520 posts, RR: 14
Reply 9, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2937 times:
I agree with N628AU, I shot N573US (the first bare metal aircraft, except without the "usair.com" titles yet) last Sunday. You could see things refelcting in the belly while it was still a good mile or two out on final. The photo used in the official press release is absolutely horrible. You would think they'd at least try to take a better photo of the plane.
My shot is in the database, I won't bother plugging it since I've got enough views already.
I think Big Foot is blurry, Its not the photographers fault. Theres a large out of focus monster roaming the countryside