Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Origin Of "# Of Souls Aboard"  
User currently offlineWilco From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 355 posts, RR: 1
Posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 10472 times:

Curious if anyone out there knows why the term "souls" is used instead of "passengers" when an aircraft comes in for an emergency landing? Is it just to make you freak out even more?! HELLO, I'm not dead yet!

[Edited 2004-03-06 17:18:16]


"Ever seen a grown man naked?"
23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineHirisk From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 223 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 10407 times:

i think it's a holdover from the maritime industry.thats where the airlines got most of their terminology.but i could be wrong about that


happy contrails
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16908 posts, RR: 67
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 10394 times:

Probably a transfer from "SOS", which means "Save Our Souls".




"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineAa757first From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3345 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 10368 times:

Probably a transfer from "SOS", which means "Save Our Souls".

SOS doesn't mean anything. SOS was simply chosen because it was easy to tap out on the telegraphy machine, and it was distinctive.

aa757first
AAndrew


User currently offlineGr8slvrflt From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 1592 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 10362 times:

Souls onboard accounts for the total number of humans: ticketed passengers, infants and crew.

User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 10362 times:

"souls" on board is more useful than "passengers" because the rescue crews need to know how many human beings are on board - including crew, deadheaders, jumpseaters and lap children.

"souls" sounds better than "bodies" now, doesn't it?

Origin? Don't know. Probably maritime.

SOS never meant anything. It is just an easy and distinctive sequence of dots and dashes to send and to identify.



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineWilco From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 355 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 10330 times:

Thanks for all the quick responses... maybe I should clarify. I know WHAT souls aboard refers to, I am curious about the word's origin in aviation.

Thanks for pointing out that the word "passengers" won't work due to it being exclusive of crew. But why not: people, persons, individuals, OR... why not just "I have 132 onboard". I am just curious why this ominous word stuck. I'm not knocking it, just curious about its origin. (the origin of aviation terms interests me, thats why I posted the "origin of the word 'cheat line'" thread last week)

Regards...



"Ever seen a grown man naked?"
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16908 posts, RR: 67
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 10301 times:

Hmmmm, I have checked this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOS and it seems that I am wrong.

However as you see from the entry I am not the only one  Big grin



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineAerosvit From Ukraine, joined Feb 2004, 112 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 10257 times:

According to my many years of reading on the Titanic, and the first time they used SOS was when it was going down, SOS means Save Our Ship.


Clava Ykraini
User currently offlineNWAA330 From United States of America, joined Jun 2003, 208 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 10188 times:

Yes Souls does sound better than bodies...but whats wrong with just saying " XXX PEOPLE aboard." Doesn't that seem to be the obvious choice? Just a thought...

NWAA330



To Fly is to Live.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16908 posts, RR: 67
Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 10182 times:

Maybe it includes dogs?

It's probably just archaic. People is rather modern language usage in this form.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineLV From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 1917 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 10087 times:

hospital helicopters use "souls" as well, and if you are lifeflighted in you are in pretty bad shape usually. if you say "people"...are you still a person if you have died but they are still in route to the hospital?

User currently offlineBullpitt From Spain, joined Mar 2004, 871 posts, RR: 8
Reply 12, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 10048 times:

I don't now the origin but I think it has something to do with the fact that on a plane you can have, for example; an extra seat purchased for a musical instrument for instance then although lets say there are 150 pax on board or ticketed, there are only 149 souls.


These are my principles but if you don't like them I have others
User currently offlineIluv727s From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 115 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 10002 times:

My initial flight instructor told the answer to this one years ago...

"Souls" are the number of live human beings onboard an aircraft. Some airlines ferry bodies (i.e. deceased) onboard as freight. Souls is a more accurate description of people onboard the flight than "passengers". A passenger may be a dead corpse in a coffin.

Hope this helps...




A lack of planning on your behalf does not create an emergency on my behalf.
User currently offlineWilcharl From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1161 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 9967 times:

guys.. its simplier then that... Souls on board came from the nautical days... Its a nautical term.

Souls on board... SOBs

everyone should know what an SOB is..

Back in the nautical days when a ship went down, they would have the # of poor sons of b****s to clean it up the acronym sob remained but it became souls on board... This was in flying magazine a few years back when someone asked the origion of Souls on board


User currently offlineMconway From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 9931 times:

Whenever I work an emergency on the North Atlantic, and there are many, I use the phrase "persons on board" instead of souls on board. I never did understand or like that phrase.

User currently offlineKalakaua From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1516 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 9866 times:

"Souls On Board" has more empathy to the sound, arousing feelings during an emergency. When you're about to crash, you don't want to refer to people as "342 ticketed passengers, 4 babies, 8 flight attendants, etc..."


Gravity explains the motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who set the planets in motion.
User currently offlineIluv727s From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 115 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 9846 times:

From the above posts, it seems we have a bunch of sensationalizing journalists attempting to read alot more into the issue than what exists...

"souls on board" differentiates live people from dead people. You may have single engine FedEx Caravan with one pilot ferrying a dead body to Walla Walla, WA. In his case, there is one SOB on board - the pilot!

I am sure the nautical explanation carries some weight but the use of "souls on board" today indicates live human beings, whether child, adult, infant, male, female, etc. Pets aren't included... sorry

I assure you that a pilot trying to land crippled A/C could care less if "souls on board" sounds more dramatic than "people", "passengers", "bodies" or whatever other term that comes to mind.

I will let someone else invoke empathy while I try steer my flaming can of kerosene to the earth!




[Edited 2004-03-07 00:30:32]


A lack of planning on your behalf does not create an emergency on my behalf.
User currently offlineHaveric From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1247 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 9807 times:

I've known quite a few SOBs in my day...

User currently offlineKalakaua From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1516 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 9788 times:

Poppycock Iluv727s. Pilots want to live too. I have flown many SOBs in my days, as well.


Gravity explains the motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who set the planets in motion.
User currently offlineJumpseat70 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 9766 times:

Dont' know the origin. However, used to be babies were never in the passenger count. So in an emergency, they were included as an obvious, "All souls onboard" count.

User currently offlineAA777MIA From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 686 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 9728 times:

Hmm, how do I explain this. This is how it was told to me, when they request souls on board, it is to know how many "living" passengers and crew are on the aircraft. Keep in mind, sometimes in cargo, airlines do carry dead humans to transport them to their final resting place. If there was an incident/accident, and was an investigation, they would not want to count the "stiff" as a possible "living passenger"..

User currently offlineAirdude66 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 187 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 9673 times:

As a former J7 employee...this was a huge mess over the crash of 592. There were multiple infants on board and the airline as with other carriers never had a formal method of tracking infants since they were not ticketed or manifested.

The only requirement to account for infants used to be international only and that was a mandate fromd customs for GenDec's and entry requirements.

Souls on Board is an industry term though and if passengers are hearing this being used then then the employees are not being discrete enough.


User currently offlineWilco From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 355 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 9565 times:

airdud66: I doubt the public ever hears this stuff. I only know of it cuz of my time in working in a tower... during 'alert' arrivals we needed to know the # of souls so that rescue units could respond with the appropriate equipment & personnel.

Thanks for all the anecdotes, answers and other responses... it makes a lot more sense when considering the transport of bodies in cargo and the need to differentiate them.



"Ever seen a grown man naked?"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A Rare, First-person Report Of A "security Scare" posted Mon Aug 28 2006 08:26:16 by Antiuser
Chances Of Y3 Being A "Sonic Cruiser" posted Thu Jul 20 2006 00:31:47 by Ruscoe
Chances Of Getting The "new DL" Product On August? posted Wed Jun 21 2006 18:40:42 by Gokmengs
Beta Version Of The New "usairways.com" Is Now Out posted Wed May 17 2006 07:23:00 by SonOfACaptain
Fate Of "Business Air" posted Thu Dec 22 2005 13:59:13 by Oznznut
Japan Plans Test Of "New Concorde" posted Tue Aug 23 2005 16:18:37 by SuseJ772
Head Of Germany's DBA Strictly Opposes "no-frills" posted Mon Aug 8 2005 19:40:18 by Udo
HA Takes 2 Out Of 3 For "triple Crown" posted Fri Aug 5 2005 20:25:42 by PVD757
AS To Order "a Couple Of Dozen More 737s" posted Mon Jun 13 2005 18:51:06 by Clickhappy
What's The Point Of "Compass Names"? posted Tue May 10 2005 20:38:30 by NWADC9