Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airline Policy On Not Using Part Of Itiniary  
User currently offlineGMIDT From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 15 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3975 times:

Hi,

I am planning to go from London to New York in August. However, airfares for non stop are about GBP 500 with either UA, BA or VS. However, if I were to book the ticket BRU to LHR to JFK on bmi and United the price is only GBP 230, and the segment LHR JFK LHR would be the same as booking the GBP 500 rtn from LHR to JFK.

If I were not to use the BRU to LHR to BRU on the bmi part of the ticket, will the United part of the itiniary still be valid.

What are there policies on not using part of the ticket?

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks

Frank

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlyLondon From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 377 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3959 times:

If it were one airline you would certainly have to originate in BRU to be able to take the LHR-JFK flight. Given they are Star partners I guess UA will probably be able to see that you didn't take the BRU-LHR flight and could deny boarding. My advice would be to get a cheap one way flight to BRU for the outbound, take the BMI flight and on the inbound just take hand luggage (if you can) and get off at Heathrow.

User currently offlineMrniji From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3952 times:

I had a similar problem and contacted the Airline. They remarked it in the Computer and it was OK then

User currently offlineXJRamper From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2460 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3949 times:

Not sure about the policies of UA, but on NW if you miss part of your flight, your itnerary is cancelled out. People who fly on us into toledo will get off in DTW not finish the leg into Toledo. Their itnerary is cancelled. When they asked why we cannot just put them into the system right there, we just tell them that they were contracted to fly through to Toledo not get off in DTW. Reservations has to rebook them and then they are allowed through to their final destination.

XJR

[Edited 2004-03-09 00:13:35]


Look ma' no hands!
User currently offlineWilco From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 355 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3917 times:

Here's the deal as I last remember it. If you mis the first leg your ticket is void (your reservations stay, but in order to board in LHR you'll have to pay the original LHRJFK fare.

BUT: An eticket shows you missed the flight (NS). If I remember correctly if you have a paper ticket, you can simply rip out the BRULHR segment (as if you borded a BRULHR flight) and everyone will be just dandy. The CS agents simply assume you boarded the BRU flight.

This is how it used to be at least. Perhaps new technology has made this trick obsolete. Either way it was a great trick.



"Ever seen a grown man naked?"
User currently offlineKKMolokai From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 760 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3900 times:

Simply not using a portion of your ticket completely invalidates the entire ticket, and in most cases will automatically cancel the entire reservation and render the ticket unusable. An airline ticket is a contract, and the fare you've agreed to pay for your ticket does come with specific rules. If those rules are compromised, that ticket (and/or contract) is now null and void.

I see it all the time. Passengers will purchase priceline tickets, and/or round-trip ticket when indeed the only need a one-way. they do this to save a few dollars, however, when they fail to show up for each flight segment, that ticket is then void, and they wind up having to pay more.

Its also illegal to simply not use a portion of your ticket (without canceling it ahead of time and paying the fare difference and/or change fee), again, since this is a legally binding contract between the airline and passenger.

Its funny, passengers always seem to "remind" the airline of their contractual duty to compensate them when their is an extensive delay, etc., however, they then complain when the airline in turn enforces ticketing rules.

P.S. International tickets are normally even more strict when it comes to not using a portion of your ticket. Not a good idea to fool around with those.



We are the people of American Airlines. And we know why you fly.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Steenland: "amfa Will Not Be Part Of Bankruptcy" posted Thu Sep 15 2005 03:34:16 by LUVRSW
Airline/Aircraft Museums Or As Part Of Museums posted Tue Apr 13 2004 03:34:48 by Ltbewr
Airline Policy On Pregnant Women posted Mon May 8 2000 08:30:55 by Danny
'Captain Bob' On TED "That Grreat Part Of United" posted Sun Oct 15 2006 00:36:18 by Mikefad
New Airline Proposed On The Isle Of Wight posted Sat Apr 22 2006 15:48:24 by Humberside
Effect Of Airline Shutdowns On Airports posted Sat Jan 7 2006 21:36:37 by SCEagle
Was Canadian Airlines Part Of An Airline Alliance? posted Fri Feb 4 2005 00:08:17 by Cyprus
Effect Of "Airline" On Southwest posted Mon Apr 5 2004 02:55:57 by Geg2rap
Effects Of US Policy On Flights From Muslim States posted Thu Feb 26 2004 14:50:57 by KEno
Top 100 Airport-pairs By Airline (Part 7 Of 7: WN) posted Sun Jan 4 2004 20:26:29 by SHUPirate1