Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Obsession With Speed/capacity  
User currently offlineTwinPioneer From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2004, 52 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 1676 times:

Why is it that we need to fly from A to B in such a rush? Why do we need to cram 300, 400 + pax into an aircraft. Economics? I can see that is a 'modern' necessity. But is it what the average holiday flyer wants?

When I sail to France, that is part of the trip and is enjoyed at it's leisurely pace. A few beers and relaxation is a good start to 'my' holiday.

The other side of the coin is arriving at an airport. Queues, security (needed)
checks, re-checks and now finger printing. We may now be weighed. (Don't make jokes about guns, knives etc)

I've flown with the RAF (Beverley, Hastings, Brittannias, Andovers, VC10 etc)
The most pleasure I found was in the Beverley. Flying to Malta it seemed to take 3 years. Stopping at Istres in France on the way. We flew at 9000' in this unpressurised beauty. Being allowed into the cockpit I was amazed to see the pilot eating a Mars bar. Hands off flying. Unforgettable. Fly out and follow the oil slick back  Laugh out loud

The point of my post is, why do we need to increase capacity/speed? I would rather fly at 9000' in an aircraft doing 250 - 300 MPH with a maximum of say 70-100 pax than be stuck in some 'modern' sweat box with a load of raucious pax celebrating the fact that they're 'off the ground' and they can drink onboard and, spend the next blur weeks doing the same.

Sorry for the long post. If I'm in the wrong group (I don't think I am) again, my apologies.

Your thoughts, more than welcome. Cheers Big grin

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFLYtoEGCC From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 947 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1624 times:

When you sail to France, you're on a cross-channel "superferry" as they call them now. You can move around on that, go to the bar, stand on deck, generally have a relax.

An average holiday flyer will probably be in economy class on a charter aircraft with 28"-30" seat pitch, and has to sit in that one cramped place with not a lot to do for a period of time - you can't go and have a beer at the bar, put your kids in the creche, go and stand on deck etc. For the average flyer and non-aviation-lover, it's not relaxing. People get on a plane to get to their holiday destination so they can relax there, and most want to get there as fast as possible. Hence the need for speed.



Come fly with me, let's fly, let's fly away...
User currently offlineTwinPioneer From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2004, 52 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1599 times:

Thanks for the input FlytoEGCC. I can understand what your saying but, is it neccessary to cram 'blur' amount of people into a plane (hateful word) when, years ago, they put the selected amount of passengers on the flight they were booked with. As for a 'creche' on ferries (again I understand) but, when people flew in the 'good old days' did children not go? Sit down, be quiet seemed to suffice. Also, I believe, when children flew the golden days of aviation they were so in awe of 'flying' they weren't a problem and didn't need 'special' priviliges(sp) Personally, I would rather travel country roads than 'bomb' up a motorway. But his is just my opinion  Big grin

User currently offlineBoingGoingGone From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1586 times:

Because time is money. End of story.

User currently offlinePA110 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2017 posts, RR: 23
Reply 4, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1560 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I, like most aviation geeks on a.net once loved the journey almost more than destination, but frankly after 20+ years in the industry, there just isn't much to hold my excitement anymore between take-off and landing. Airline service in virtually all classes has become lackluster and homogenized. And that trip to the airport, which used to be so exciting, is now met with more of a sense of forboding, having to tackle the endless queues and searches. I say find a way to speed up the portion of the flight in between takeoff and landing, get me through the airports more efficiently, and allow me to maximize my time at my destination, which these days has become more the point of travel, than just the journey itself.


It's been swell, but the swelling has gone down.
User currently offlineGLAGAZ From UK - Scotland, joined Feb 2004, 1983 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1553 times:

Lots of people and high frequency = MONEY = JOBS = HAPPY PEOPLE = HAPPY COUNTRY.


Neutrality means that u don't really care cos the struggle goes on even when ur not there, blind and unaware
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 1001 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1515 times:

I haven’t noticed a huge increase in the speed of aircraft. With the exception of the Concorde, everything for the last 40 years has cruised between Mach .80 and .85. Capacity has stayed the same for roughly 30 years. The 747 was the biggest airliner in 1970 and is the largest in 2004.

Why is this necessary? Economics... duh


User currently offlineSpaceman From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 534 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1498 times:

Hey, if you are rich, you can have your own fleet of planes for different purposes and enjoy them all by yourself. You can also be president of US then you can have airforce one and not share with alot of people. My point is most of us have to make do with the next best thing that is fly witht he public. I actually think flying with alot more people in a big jet is not so bad. Plus airlines always buy new exciting equipment you can try.

User currently offlineBobb From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 246 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1467 times:

Either u are retired, 60+, or 18-. People in between don't have the time to spare to be staring out the clouds for hours on end.

User currently offlineUsatoeze From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 358 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1444 times:

Because time is money.


Exactly! Although it is nice once in awhile to take a leisure trip, it wouldn't fit most of the people on earth more than just a few times in a lifetime. Would anyone want to take a 3000m trip to see their in-laws if it took 12 hours instead of 6? I don't think so.



War is a very poor political tool
User currently offlineLHcapt2007 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1399 times:

So lets all fly under FL180, imagine how crazy traffic would get. Thats like making a 4 lane highway into one lane.
Lets go slow too, and imagine a highway full of grandmas driving, what happens when you need to be somewhere important soon? nothing!
How about bad weather you cant fly over or more fuel to burn because you have to still take the same number of people in 15 small planes rather than in one big one.
The big boys should do their thing, and you should fly commuters eveywhere!
But still I respect your point, i want to take my time and smell the roses too..
Long live the giants of the air, faster, higher further!

cheers,
LHcapt2007








TNCM
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Accurate Is FlightAware.com With Speed? posted Mon Jan 21 2008 21:27:33 by TrijetsRMissed
747s With Enormous Capacity? posted Mon Dec 15 2003 12:52:30 by Duke
Obsession With N-numbers posted Fri Mar 28 2003 03:01:53 by N777UA
Obsession With Ultra Long Haul. posted Sat Apr 13 2002 13:10:54 by Boeing767-300
A Little Help With Determining Capacity! posted Tue Feb 19 2002 05:27:17 by LanPeru
Gulf Air Turnaround Gathers Speed With New Chief posted Tue Dec 17 2002 00:57:48 by GF-A330
Time For B737-900X With More Seating Capacity? posted Wed Feb 7 2001 03:32:50 by Crosswind
Viewing This Site With High Speed Access posted Wed Aug 23 2000 20:57:24 by Brick
Speed Or Capacity? posted Sun May 23 1999 21:25:18 by Lancer
AirTran Plans Capacity Cuts, Will Sell More Planes posted Wed Jun 18 2008 15:19:39 by KarlB737