Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LHR To LAX..which Airline?  
User currently offlineVs744 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2001, 677 posts, RR: 1
Posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 3122 times:

I've just booked flights from LHR-LAX-LHr with united in business class. This was because the company I work for has a deal with united.

How do they compare to BA and Virgin? i've flown virgin Upper before and was v.impressed but now im going with united...and on a 777 for the first time and wanted to know if they're good?

Thanks!

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineQantasclub From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 757 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 3044 times:

I would say that United definedtly runs a poor second to BA and VS which are both excellent and on par with each other. BA's beds are better (more comfortable) and their clubworld is a pretty solid, consistent performer. VS is fantastic; a much 'hipper' product-their upperclass is impressive, as you already know.
UA has the worst service (non-existent in most cases), and older product which is what you would expect with a tired beast of an airline still on the verge of bankruptcy. (the very fact that they have spent millions unveiling a new livery when the airline is desperately trying to cut costs and survive just goes to show you how out of touch they are with reality).



Long Haul is the only way to go
User currently offlineWorldoftui From Sweden, joined Aug 2007, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 3016 times:

I have traveled with BA and UA in Club and I think that, in many respects, UA is the superior product.
Granted, the BA Terrace lounge at LHR is superb, whereas UA's lounges are famously spartan, or "minimalist"  Big grin

Where I think that UA beats BA is on board. I can't stand the new club world seats. Seemed narrower than UA's seats (although they do recline fully), and definitely felt a more crowded cabin. Didn't have much of a "club" feel at all really. The forwards / backwards seats thing basically seemed like a way to put more people in to the same space. Quite disappointing. Food with BA was good, as was United. Basically, the old BA seats were better IMHO. United's business product is a good one, and one which is now receiving constant enhancements.
Having done 100,000 miles in the last 2 years with UA, I can honestly say that I feel their service is friendly and genuine.

I think that the product will feel very different to Virgin. As Qantasclub said, they are a very "hip" product, something that cannot be said for UA (although it looks that they are trying for a fresher feel with their new image)

Not v experienced in flying up front. Just a few times here and there unfortunately. Just my opinion, but I think (and hope) you enjoy your flight with United.


Mark


User currently offlineTavve From Sweden, joined Sep 2003, 172 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 3016 times:

I've only flown in tourist class VS LHR-LAX, BOS-LGW and UA LHR-ORD, ORD-LHR. My verdict: United ¤%&¤!!! Well, they were on time both ways and VS were on average 16 hours late but the service on UA is really lousy. I don't require much at all but it really sucked. VS was absolutely great.


GOT, that's where I live
User currently offlineUal747-600 From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 577 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2936 times:

AA and Air New Zealand also fly LAX-LHR non-stop.

UAL747-600


User currently offlineGilesdavies From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 3003 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2793 times:

I am flying US Airways LGW-PHL-LAX on Tuesday.

Will let you know how I get on.

Personally I couldn't sit for 11hrs on one flight, and like to change aircraft gives you a chance to stretch your legs and have a look around.

Paid £169 for our flight return inclusive of tax.


User currently offlineZrs70 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 3123 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2731 times:

As the ticket is in business, and I would immagine Full Fare, you can take it over to another *A carrier (NZ) and fly them in one direction. That way you will be able to try both.


14 year airliners.net vet! 2000-2013
User currently offlineThrust From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 2688 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2711 times:

How is LAX-LHR nonstop on AA? What's the service like?


Fly one thing; Fly it well
User currently offlineNickofatlanta From Australia, joined May 2000, 1485 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2657 times:

Zrs70 -

Does not sound like it is full fare. Quote from original post, "This was because the company I work for has a deal with united." Thus, the ticket most probably can not be transferred to another Star carrier without suitable endorsement by UA.

If I had a choice on this route, I'd take NZ.


User currently offlineTBCITDG From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 921 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2597 times:

BAfor sure!!!!!!!!!
Why would you even think of flyinng any one else??


User currently offlineUALFAson From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 696 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2553 times:

I just flew UA C-class LAX-LHR-LAX two weeks ago.

The inflight service was pretty good--not exceptional, but very good. (I've flown BA too and their service isn't exactly anything to write home about, IMHO.) The food and wine were quite satisfactory and offered frequently. The seats were comfortable, you get a personal TV, and I'd rather fly a 777 anyway than the 747 you'd likely fly w/BA.

Your biggest advantage will be at check-in. At LAX, you'll be able to zippity-do-da right through Terminal 6 and be at your gate in minutes as opposed to dealing with the always chaotic Bradley Int'l Terminal that BA uses. At LHR, you'll likewise get through *A T3 fairly easily compared to BA's nightmare T4 (although I noticed the LAX flight is now out of T1).

I've never flown Virgin so I can't compare, but I think you will be quite pleased with UAL.

Enjoy your visit here to sunny SoCal!

(This is my first post. You should feel honored Big grin



"We hope you've enjoyed flying with us as much as we've enjoyed taking you for a ride."
User currently offlineNickofatlanta From Australia, joined May 2000, 1485 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2532 times:

Terminal 3 at LHR is far more crowded than Terminal 4. The check-in area at Terminal 3 is a zoo at the best of times.

User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16245 posts, RR: 56
Reply 12, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2520 times:

Terminal 3 at LHR is bad enough to turn anyone off flying AA, UA etc from LHR whatever class you're flying in.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineUa777222 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3348 posts, RR: 11
Reply 13, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2504 times:

I too am going to fly SFO-LAX-LHR united. I have not done this route before. Is there anything I should be worried about with my connection between SFO-LAX-SFO? I have about an hour and a half. I'm not too worried about the LAX-SFO but will I have enough time for my connection between SFO-LAX. Sorry if I turned the forum onto me  Smile


UA777222



"It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark."
User currently offlineUALFAson From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 696 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2475 times:

Hmmm...when I checked in at T3 for LHR-LAX on a Monday morning, there was no line for UA business or economy. The flight wound up being close to full, though. AA's ticket counter was crowded, but there weren't really long lines at any of the airlines.

I can't imagine anything being worse than T4.



"We hope you've enjoyed flying with us as much as we've enjoyed taking you for a ride."
User currently offlineVs744 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2001, 677 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2434 times:

Cool, thanks! didnt xpect to get so many replies!

i'd always choose VS over any other Airline since im a silver flying club member and on the brink of making gold. I will no doubt enrol in the UA scheme now. What will I get for a return biz class seat from LHR to LAX? free european flight with BMi? or better?


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Manchester To Bangkok: Which Airline And A/c posted Mon Oct 23 2006 15:15:57 by BA787
JAX To SAN, Which Airline? posted Wed Jun 30 2004 08:03:20 by Alespesl
Goin To HNL, Which Airline? posted Sun May 16 2004 02:18:14 by XJRamper
NYC To YYZ - Which Airline? posted Sun Apr 18 2004 02:39:12 by Vingt20cent
NS From Funchal To UK? Which Airline? Not Caucasus posted Wed Jul 30 2003 01:00:54 by Pe@rson
JFK To Japan: Which Airline? posted Tue Mar 26 2002 21:33:42 by AT
CKG To LON - Which Airline To Choose? posted Tue Feb 19 2002 15:39:32 by B744F
Glasgow To Amsterdam - Which Airline? posted Wed Jan 9 2002 19:02:52 by Futura
Cape Town To Rio - Which Airline? posted Wed Oct 3 2001 13:05:07 by Timmay
LHR-JFK, C Class Which Airline posted Wed Sep 12 2001 16:41:26 by Dvintiadis