Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Odd WN Manuver On Approach To SAN  
User currently offlineFutureualpilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2608 posts, RR: 8
Posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3488 times:

Today I was downtown for a few hours, and I was able to see a fair amount of the final approach to SAN. Everything was normal most of the time, except for one WN that made an odd turn very close to the runway.

A mile, maybe 2 miles from the runway(approaching 27), it powered up and made a climbing right 180 degree turn towards the east and flew away with gear and fglaps still down. It came in later, but this was odd to me because normally a go around for SAN is slightly to the left, out over the harbor and so on. My only guess is another aircraft was taking off and instead of the WN jet continuing westwards and getting very close to another departing aircraft, it made a 180 and came back in.

Does anybody have any info on why this might have happened?



[Edited 2004-03-14 04:27:35]


Life is better when you surf.
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 3351 times:

Sounds like ATC gave him a 360 for spacing...

User currently offlineScooter From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 856 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 3297 times:

Funny...I saw that too while driving south on the 5 just north of the airport. First time I have ever seen a go-around like that at SAN.

I just thought it might have been a missed approach for North Island (couldn't tell it was a WN 737 from my angle).


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 3, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 3276 times:

Damn those WN air pilot cowboys.


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4491 posts, RR: 21
Reply 4, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3233 times:

AirframeAS,

Let's think for a minute...was that really necessary?



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 5, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3199 times:

yeah it was....basically they think they are GOD. They think they can do anything they want (except for ATC commands) Excessive speeding on taxiways is one example, they really go fast like they have no patience. Ive heard alot of other airline pilots (expecially AS and HP) complain about WN's recklessness on the taxiway, but that was long time ago.


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3155 times:

>>>Damn those WN air pilot cowboys.

>>>They think they can do anything they want (except for ATC commands)

If the guys flying the observed flight were indeed making a 360 for spacing, they wouldn't haven't been doing so on their own whims under your "cowboy" theory, but would have been doing so after having been directed by ATC. Accordingly, your second statement tends to disprove your first statement.

BTW, maybe they haven't covered this in your AMT class yet, but assumptive generalizations about other employee groups and/or other airlines can be inaccurate, just like saying "always" or "never" in this biz...









User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 7, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3120 times:

There ARE speed limits on the ramp ya know.....food for thought. But the 'cowboy' thing is only my opinion based on hanging out and socializing with the AS pilots in SEA. I also read in an article in the company's employee newsletter for pilots only that the F.A.A. has been complaining to AS about the AS pilots were making unprofessional comments in regards to how WN taxis on the taxiway (speeding and cutting in line for take-off, etc etc..) and those comments had to be stopped because the F.A.A. was listening on the airwaves for unprofessional behavior. But this is not what this topic is about so lets leave it as that.

BTW, maybe they haven't covered this in your AMT class yet, but assumptive generalizations about other employee groups and/or other airlines can be inaccurate, just like saying "always" or "never" in this biz...

This is/was not even covered in any AMT classes, we are not going be trained to become pilots, we are being trained to become LICENSED A&P mechanics so we cant fly the planes since our licenses wouldnt be covered for that. As for getting inaccurate about info from certain workgroups, I agree with that, there will always be 'he said/she said' type situations.

Disclaimer: This is only MY opinion about WN.




A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineH53Epilot From Israel, joined Mar 2004, 177 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3118 times:

Grow up junior. There's a reason why we haven't EVER had a passenger fatality. If this means we are seen as some sort of deity by other pilots and rampers like yourself, then so be it.

User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4491 posts, RR: 21
Reply 9, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3103 times:

AirframeAS,

Accusing WN crews of "defensive driving" on the ground is one thing. But accusing them of inventing their own go-around, flying in the face of established air safety edict (and procedures violations) is another.

Your AMT trainee status gives you NO range to criticize the flight crews at WN or ANY airline for that matter. Just because you see an aircraft with "Southwest" painted on the tail do something different from another aircraft doesn't mean it's not supposed to do it.

There ARE speed limits on the ramp ya know.....food for thought.

Yes, on some, there are. Not all, by any stretch of the imagination. Taxiways are a different story. WN crews taxi at safe speeds on any surface.

WN pilots do not willingly, to the best of their knowledge, break ANY rules, nor does management endorse such behavior in any way. Flying remains a profession, you know. For you to accuse anyone of this, with your total lack of knowledge on the subject, is totally ridiculous. But hey, this is Airliners.net, what's new?



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 10, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3099 times:

I am grown up first of all. Second of all I stated in my disclaimer that it was ONLY MY OPINION. Third of all, no pax fatality on WN. I agree with that. But what happened to that BUR incident a few years back? Thats laughable because WN damaged that aircraft beyond repair and ended up at a Chevron gas station. If I remember correctly, it was the joke in the industry at the time and it was the talk of the week when it happened. And finally, Im not even a ramper or a pilot. I can't become one because I dont have any ears, I'm deaf. But I can become an A&P mechanic.


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4491 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3083 times:

But what happened to that BUR incident a few years back? Thats laughable because WN damaged that aircraft beyond repair and ended up at a Chevron gas station.

Name one airline who hasn't bent an airplane once or twice and I'll assume you have a point.

If I remember correctly, it was the joke in the industry at the time and it was the talk of the week when it happened.

What's your point here? The AA pilot flipping off the Brazilian authorities was another "joke of the week." Do we still talk about it? No.

I am grown up first of all

I know this borders on irrelevancy, but it'd be nice if you'd act that way.

[Edited 2004-03-14 09:07:32]


I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 12, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3069 times:

*waves white flag* End of discussion!  Big thumbs up


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineAmwest25 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3064 times:

In defense of AirframeAS at my time with HP in various citys and talking to HP pilots and YV pilots everyday as I was in ops and a loadmaster, I can name more then a few pilots who have complained about WN's excessive taxi speeds.

User currently offlineAAR90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3494 posts, RR: 46
Reply 14, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3053 times:

A mile, maybe 2 miles from the runway(approaching 27), it powered up and made a climbing right 180 degree turn towards the east and flew away with gear and fglaps still down. It came in later...

Hmmm, how much "later"??? A RIGHT turn is normally used only when there is an air traffic problem south of the field. Otherwise ATC normally uses a LEFT turn to keep clear of Montgomery and Miramar traffic. Could be North Island traffic, helo's in/around the bay, police and/or medical flights, etc.



*NO CARRIER* -- A Naval Aviator's worst nightmare!
User currently offlinePanAm747 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4242 posts, RR: 8
Reply 15, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3028 times:

I have seen several planes do this on approach to SAN.

Generally, the busiest time for landings is in the afternoon to early evening. The early morning to early afternoon is hit or miss for spotting, as a lot of the planes are not scheduled for landing close together.

Therefore, there are times that there are very long spaces between incoming planes. It would seem to me that if there if a plane is too high (and heaven knows the approach to SAN is one of the most unforgiving!!), then a standard missed approach (which is a big loop to the south, as is the standard east-bound departure route after take off from Runway 27) might not be necessary if there is no traffic in the immediate area.

That's my two cents worth!!



Pan Am:The World's Most Experienced Airline - P(oor) S(ailor's) A(irline): San Diego's Hometown Airline-Catch Our Smile!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Who's DC-10 On Approach To SAN Today? posted Thu Jan 5 2006 19:38:36 by PanAm747
Low Pass On Approach To PDX posted Thu Aug 3 2006 06:38:40 by PDXflyer31
Very Strange Approach To SAN Today... posted Sat Jun 10 2006 20:44:42 by Radelow
Aircraft Destroys House's Roof On Approach To SYD posted Mon May 23 2005 16:54:05 by USAFHummer
Message In The Snow On Approach To 9-R @ ORD posted Mon Dec 27 2004 20:00:24 by UnitedRhapsody
Flying Extremely Close When On Approach To YYZ posted Mon Jan 27 2003 12:12:51 by Red Panda
Thunderstorms On Approach To TLV ... posted Thu Feb 14 2002 09:34:57 by Hb-iqj
Red Airplane On Approach To MEM posted Thu Oct 11 2001 04:05:52 by Skihigh2002
Drawing In Crops On Approach To DEN posted Sat Sep 8 2001 05:33:24 by Airbus380
Herb Says WN Was On Its Way To A Record Till 9/11 posted Mon Sep 11 2006 00:04:29 by KarlB737